Literature DB >> 17251224

Customised birthweight standards accurately predict perinatal morbidity.

Francesc Figueras1, Josep Figueras, Eva Meler, Elisenda Eixarch, Oriol Coll, Eduard Gratacos, Jason Gardosi, Xavier Carbonell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fetal growth restriction is associated with adverse perinatal outcome but is often not recognised antenatally, and low birthweight centiles based on population norms are used as a proxy instead. This study compared the association between neonatal morbidity and fetal growth status at birth as determined by customised birthweight centiles and currently used centiles based on population standards.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Referral hospital, Barcelona, Spain. PATIENTS: A cohort of 13 661 non-malformed singleton deliveries.
INTERVENTIONS: Both population-based and customised standards for birth weight were applied to the study cohort. Customised weight centiles were calculated by adjusting for maternal height, booking weight, parity, ethnic origin, gestational age at delivery and fetal sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Newborn morbidity and perinatal death.
RESULTS: The association between smallness for gestational age (SGA) and perinatal morbidity was stronger when birthweight limits were customised, and resulted in an additional 4.1% (n=565) neonates being classified as SGA. Compared with non-SGA neonates, this newly identified group had an increased risk of perinatal mortality (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.6 to 6.2), neurological morbidity (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.7 to 6.1) and non-neurological morbidity (OR 8; 95% CI 4.8 to 13.6).
CONCLUSION: Customised standards improve the prediction of adverse neonatal outcome. The association between SGA and adverse outcome is independent of the gestational age at delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17251224      PMCID: PMC2675427          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.108621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  19 in total

1.  Customized fetal weight limits for antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  C L De Jong; A Francis; H P Van Geijn; J Gardosi
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Sue M Kady; Jason Gardosi
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.237

3.  Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics.

Authors:  J C Drooger; J W M Troe; G J J M Borsboom; A Hofman; J P Mackenbach; H A Moll; R J M Snijders; F C Verhulst; J C M Witteman; E A P Steegers; I M A Joung
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; J Martinez-Poyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm.

Authors:  L A Papile; J Burstein; R Burstein; H Koffler
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 6.  Necrotizing enterocolitis: a practitioner's perspective.

Authors:  M C Walsh; R M Kliegman; A A Fanaroff
Journal:  Pediatr Rev       Date:  1988-01

7.  Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth in single births: European collaborative study.

Authors:  Stephen Jarvis; Svetlana V Glinianaia; Maria-Giulia Torrioli; Mary-Jane Platt; Maria Miceli; Pierre-Simon Jouk; Ann Johnson; Jane Hutton; Karla Hemming; Gudrun Hagberg; Helen Dolk; James Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population.

Authors:  M Wilcox; J Gardosi; M Mongelli; C Ray; I Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-04

9.  Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery.

Authors:  W J Ott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Ultrasound evolution and later outcome of infants with periventricular densities.

Authors:  L S De Vries; R Regev; J M Pennock; J S Wigglesworth; L M Dubowitz
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  20 in total

1.  Snoring during pregnancy and delivery outcomes: a cohort study.

Authors:  Louise M O'Brien; Alexandra S Bullough; Jocelynn T Owusu; Kimberley A Tremblay; Cynthia A Brincat; Mark C Chames; John D Kalbfleisch; Ronald D Chervin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Risk of adverse outcomes among infants of immigrant women according to birth-weight curves tailored to maternal world region of origin.

Authors:  Marcelo L Urquia; Howard Berger; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.

Authors:  D Kabiri; R Romero; D W Gudicha; E Hernandez-Andrade; P Pacora; N Benshalom-Tirosh; D Tirosh; L Yeo; O Erez; S S Hassan; A L Tarca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Personalized third-trimester fetal growth evaluation: comparisons of individualized growth assessment, percentile line and conditional probability methods.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Jia Li; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-09-25

5.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 6.  Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women.

Authors:  Angela E Carberry; Adrienne Gordon; Diana M Bond; Jon Hyett; Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Heather E Jeffery
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-16

7.  Predictive Accuracy of Singleton Versus Customized Twin Growth Chart for Adverse Perinatal Outcome: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Urszula Nowacka; Katarzyna Kosińska-Kaczyńska; Paweł Krajewski; Aleksandra Saletra-Bielińska; Izabela Walasik; Iwona Szymusik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Jacqueline E A K Bamfo; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 9.  Mechanisms Involved in the Association between Periodontitis and Complications in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Marcela Yang Hui Zi; Priscila Larcher Longo; Bruno Bueno-Silva; Marcia Pinto Alves Mayer
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-01-29

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants.

Authors:  Tanis R Fenton; Jae H Kim
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.