Literature DB >> 26450350

Investigation of differences in the binding affinities of two analogous ligands for untagged and tagged p38 kinase using thermodynamic integration MD simulation.

Ying-Chieh Sun1, Wen-Chi Hsu2, Chia-Jen Hsu2, Chia-Ming Chang2, Kai-Hsiang Cheng2.   

Abstract

Thermodynamic integration (TI) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for the binding of a pair of a reference ("ref") ligand and an analogous ("analog") ligand to either tagged (with six extra residues at the N-terminus) or untagged p38 kinase proteins were carried out in order to probe how the binding affinity is influenced by the presence or absence of the peptide tag in p38 kinase. This possible effect of protein length on the binding affinity of a ligand-which is seldom addressed in the literature-is important because, even when two labs claim to have performed experiments with the same protein, they may actually have studied variants of the same protein with different lengths because they applied different protein expression conditions/procedures. Thus, if we wanted to compare ligand binding affinities measured in the two labs, it would be necessary to account for any variation in ligand binding affinity with protein length. The pair of ligand-p38 kinase complexes examined in this work (pdb codes: 3d7z and 3lhj, respectively) were ideal for investigating this effect. The experimentally determined binding energy for the ref ligand with the untagged p38 kinase was -10.9 kcal mol(-1), while that for the analog ligand with the tagged p38 kinase was -11.9 kcal mol(-1). The present TI-MD simulation of the mutation of the ref ligand into the analog ligand while the ligand is bound to the untagged p38 kinase predicted that the binding affinity of the analog ligand is 2.0 kcal mol(-1) greater than that of the ref ligand. A similar simulation also indicated that the same was true for ligand binding to the tagged protein, but in this case the binding affinity for the analog ligand is 2.5 kcal mol(-1) larger than that for the ref ligand. These results therefore suggest that the presence of the peptide tag on p38 kinase increased the difference in the binding energies of the ligands by a small amount of 0.5 kcal mol(-1). This result supports the assumption that the presence of a peptide tag has only a minor effect on ΔG values. The error bars in the computed ΔG values were then estimated via confidence interval analysis and a time autocorrelation function for the quantity dV/dλ. The estimated correlation time was ~0.5 ps and the error bar in the ΔG values estimated using nanosecond-scale simulations was ±0.3 kcal mol(-1) at a confidence level of 95%. These predicted results can be verified in future experiments and should prove useful in subsequent similar studies. Graphical Abstract Thermodynamic cycles for binding of two analogous ligands with untagged and tagged p38 kinases and associated Gibbs free energy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ligand–protein complex; Molecular dynamics simulation; Thermodynamic integration; p38 kinase

Year:  2015        PMID: 26450350     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-015-2825-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  16 in total

1.  Accurate ensemble molecular dynamics binding free energy ranking of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 proteases.

Authors:  S Kashif Sadiq; David W Wright; Owain A Kenway; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data.

Authors:  Daniel R Roe; Thomas E Cheatham
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Using thermodynamic integration MD simulation to compute relative protein-ligand binding free energy of a GSK3β kinase inhibitor and its analogs.

Authors:  Hsing-Chou Lee; Wen-Chi Hsu; An-Lun Liu; Chia-Jen Hsu; Ying-Chieh Sun
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 4.  Towards accurate free energy calculations in ligand protein-binding studies.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; Andreas Labahn
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Free energy calculations of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Anita de Ruiter; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Locally accessible conformations of proteins: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin.

Authors:  L S Caves; J D Evanseck; M Karplus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Discovery and evaluation of 7-alkyl-1,5-bis-aryl-pyrazolopyridinones as highly potent, selective, and orally efficacious inhibitors of p38alpha mitogen-activated protein kinase.

Authors:  Liping H Pettus; Ryan P Wurz; Shimin Xu; Brad Herberich; Bradley Henkle; Qiurong Liu; Helen J McBride; Sharon Mu; Matthew H Plant; Christiaan J M Saris; Lisa Sherman; Lu Min Wong; Samer Chmait; Matthew R Lee; Christopher Mohr; Faye Hsieh; Andrew S Tasker
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 8.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Biphenyl amide p38 kinase inhibitors 3: Improvement of cellular and in vivo activity.

Authors:  Richard Angell; Nicola M Aston; Paul Bamborough; Jacky B Buckton; Stuart Cockerill; Suzanne J deBoeck; Chris D Edwards; Duncan S Holmes; Katherine L Jones; Dramane I Laine; Shila Patel; Penny A Smee; Kathryn J Smith; Don O Somers; Ann L Walker
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Improving the Efficiency of Free Energy Calculations in the Amber Molecular Dynamics Package.

Authors:  Joseph W Kaus; Levi T Pierce; Ross C Walker; J Andrew McCammont
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimal designs for pairwise calculation: An application to free energy perturbation in minimizing prediction variability.

Authors:  Qingyi Yang; Woodrow Burchett; Gregory S Steeno; Shuai Liu; Mingjun Yang; David L Mobley; Xinjun Hou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.376

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.