Literature DB >> 20384328

Accurate ensemble molecular dynamics binding free energy ranking of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 proteases.

S Kashif Sadiq1, David W Wright, Owain A Kenway, Peter V Coveney.   

Abstract

Accurate calculation of important thermodynamic properties, such as macromolecular binding free energies, is one of the principal goals of molecular dynamics simulations. However, single long simulation frequently produces incorrectly converged quantitative results due to inadequate sampling of conformational space in a feasible wall-clock time. Multiple short (ensemble) simulations have been shown to explore conformational space more effectively than single long simulations, but the two methods have not yet been thermodynamically compared. Here we show that, for end-state binding free energy determination methods, ensemble simulations exhibit significantly enhanced thermodynamic sampling over single long simulations and result in accurate and converged relative binding free energies that are reproducible to within 0.5 kcal/mol. Completely correct ranking is obtained for six HIV-1 protease variants bound to lopinavir with a correlation coefficient of 0.89 and a mean relative deviation from experiment of 0.9 kcal/mol. Multidrug resistance to lopinavir is enthalpically driven and increases through a decrease in the protein-ligand van der Waals interaction, principally due to the V82A/I84V mutation, and an increase in net electrostatic repulsion due to water-mediated disruption of protein-ligand interactions in the catalytic region. Furthermore, we correctly rank, to within 1 kcal/mol of experiment, the substantially increased chemical potency of lopinavir binding to the wild-type protease compared to saquinavir and show that lopinavir takes advantage of a decreased net electrostatic repulsion to confer enhanced binding. Our approach is dependent on the combined use of petascale computing resources and on an automated simulation workflow to attain the required level of sampling and turn around time to obtain the results, which can be as little as three days. This level of performance promotes integration of such methodology with clinical decision support systems for the optimization of patient-specific therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20384328     DOI: 10.1021/ci100007w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  28 in total

1.  Investigation of differences in the binding affinities of two analogous ligands for untagged and tagged p38 kinase using thermodynamic integration MD simulation.

Authors:  Ying-Chieh Sun; Wen-Chi Hsu; Chia-Jen Hsu; Chia-Ming Chang; Kai-Hsiang Cheng
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Computation of relative binding free energy for an inhibitor and its analogs binding with Erk kinase using thermodynamic integration MD simulation.

Authors:  Kuan-Wei Wu; Po-Chin Chen; Jun Wang; Ying-Chieh Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Rapid and accurate ranking of binding affinities of epidermal growth factor receptor sequences with selected lung cancer drugs.

Authors:  Shunzhou Wan; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Machine learning accelerates MD-based binding pose prediction between ligands and proteins.

Authors:  Kei Terayama; Hiroaki Iwata; Mitsugu Araki; Yasushi Okuno; Koji Tsuda
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Alchemical Free Energy Estimators and Molecular Dynamics Engines: Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Alexander D Wade; Agastya P Bhati; Shunzhou Wan; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.578

Review 6.  Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug-Target Binding by Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Sergio Decherchi; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  On Restraints in End-Point Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  William M Menzer; Bing Xie; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 8.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.098

9.  Molecular dynamics simulation in virus research.

Authors:  Hirotaka Ode; Masaaki Nakashima; Shingo Kitamura; Wataru Sugiura; Hironori Sato
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Addressing human variability in next-generation human health risk assessments of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Lauren Zeise; Frederic Y Bois; Weihsueh A Chiu; Dale Hattis; Ivan Rusyn; Kathryn Z Guyton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.