Literature DB >> 26449214

Epi-No should be tested in different obstetric settings until an evidence-based clinical decision can be made.

Luiz G O Brito1, Cristine H Ferreira2, Alessandra C Marcolin3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26449214     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-015-2857-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin. Episiotomy. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 71, April 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Randomized controlled trial: the gold standard or an unobtainable fallacy?

Authors:  Lars Bondemark; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Antepartum use of Epi-No birth trainer for preventing perineal trauma: systematic review.

Authors:  Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito; Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira; Geraldo Duarte; Antonio Alberto Nogueira; Alessandra Cristina Marcolin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Pelvic floor and anal sphincter trauma should be key performance indicators of maternity services.

Authors:  H P Dietz; J Pardey; H Murray
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Episiotomy, hospital birth and cesarean section: technology gone haywire--what is the sutured tear rate at first births supposed to be?

Authors:  Judy Slome Cohain
Journal:  Midwifery Today Int Midwife       Date:  2008
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.