| Literature DB >> 26448896 |
Hongcheng Liu1, Tao Lin1, Jia Mao2, Huan Lu3, Dongshun Yang1, Jiliang Wang3, Qiwan Li1.
Abstract
A simple, accurate, and highly sensitive analytical method was developed for determining the paclobutrazol residue in potato and soil, the dynamics dissipation in soil. Extraction was carried out by low temperature partitioning and analyzed by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). For a favor extraction yield, the parameters such as temperature and solvent were optimized. The result showed that sample would be easily frozen and separated using acetonitrile under -20°C for 10 min. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.5 μg/kg, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 2 and 5 μg/kg for potato and soil, respectively. The influence of paclobutrazol residue in potato was evaluated. The possible contamination of paclobutrazol from surface can be rinsed by distilled water or peeled off, but the paclobutrazol in potato harvest comes mainly from absorption and transport, which could not be removed by peeling. The half-life of paclobutrazol in soil was 20.64 days, and the residue was below 0.22 mg/kg on 50th day after spraying. According to the risk assessment with Need Maximum Daily Intake (NEDI) and Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI), a Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) of paclobutrazol in potato was recommended as 1.0 mg/kg.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26448896 PMCID: PMC4584097 DOI: 10.1155/2015/404925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1The chemical constructure of paclobutrazol.
Figure 2Multiple reaction monitor (MRM) chromatograms of paclobutrazol fortified and potato blank and soil blank in quantitative ion, t = 5.41 min (paclobutrazol).
Recoveries from two samples (five replicates).
| Sample | Spiked value ( | Paclobutrazol | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSD (%) | Recovery (%) | ||
| Potato | 5 | 7.89 | 106.3 |
| 50 | 6.54 | 87.5 | |
| 100 | 3.62 | 93.0 | |
|
| |||
| Soil | 5 | 10.1 | 104.9 |
| 50 | 6.51 | 82.9 | |
| 100 | 8.76 | 83.4 | |
Final residues of paclobutrazol in potato and soil.
| Sample | Treatment | Dosage g (available ingredient)/ha | Residues (mg/kg ± SD, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 d | 32 d | 40 d | |||
| Potato | Foliar spray without cover | 40 | NDa | ND | ND |
| 60 | 0.041 ± 0.012 | 0.022 ± 0.008 | 0.017 ± 0.006 | ||
| 100 | 0.732 ± 0.028 | 0.521 ± 0.022 | 0.481 ± 0.017 | ||
| Foliar spray with cover | 40 | ND | ND | ND | |
| 60 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 100 | ND | ND | ND | ||
|
| |||||
| Soil | Foliar spray without cover | 40 | 0.081 ± 0.019 | 0.032 ± 0.013 | 0.021 ± 0.006 |
| 60 | 0.517 ± 0.027 | 0.258 ± 0.021 | 0.224 ± 0.017 | ||
| 100 | 2.71 ± 0.23 | 1.42 ± 0.17 | 1.08 ± 0.12 | ||
| Foliar spray with cover | 40 | ND | ND | ND | |
| 60 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 100 | ND | ND | ND | ||
aND: not detected.
Figure 3The content of paclobutrazol with different treatment after peeling and rinsing.
Figure 4The dynamic dissipation rate of paclobutrazol in soil.