| Literature DB >> 26446439 |
Su-Ping Kong1, Qi-Wen Tan2, Ying Liu2, Xiang-Hong Jing3, Bing Zhu3, Yong-Jun Huo4, Bin-Bin Nie5, Dian-Hui Yang2.
Abstract
Acupoint specificity is a foundational concept in acupuncture theory. It is closely related to the function of the acupoint. In this study, we sought to probe the central mechanisms of the specific correlation between LI4 and orofacial part in Bell's palsy patients. In total, 36 patients with left Bell's palsy were divided into three groups in random order, and each group received transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at only one of three acupoints (LI4, ST6, and a sham point). A single-block fMRI design paradigm was applied to separately detect neural activity related to different stages of TEAS (prestimulation resting state, stimulation, and poststimulation resting state). Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired during TEAS. There were extensive neuronal activities in the LI4 and ST6 groups and significant differences between stimulation at real and sham points. Brain regions were activated more by real acupoint TEAS than by sham point TEAS. Brain regions that were activated with LI4 and ST6 were broadly overlapping and adjacent. Our results provide supplementary neuroimaging evidence for the existence of acupoint specificity. These results may confirm the central mechanisms of the specific correlation between the Hegu point and the orofacial part.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26446439 PMCID: PMC4584065 DOI: 10.1155/2015/585493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Localization of stimulated acupoints.
Figure 2Experimental paradigm.
Activations for the group TEAS at LI4 point compared with a resting baseline are shown (P < 0.005, cluster >20 voxels, uncorrected).
| Brain regions | MNI coordinates | BA | L/R | Voxels |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Superior temporal gyrus | −60 | 8 | 1 | 22 | L | 94 | 4.799 |
| Precentral gyrus | −60 | 8 | 1 | 6 | L | 23 | 4.799 |
| Cerebellum | −36 | 44 | 19 | L | 147 | 3.481 | |
| Middle frontal gyrus | −36 | 44 | 19 | 8 | L | 129 | 3.481 |
| Inferior parietal lobule | 63 | −31 | 43 | 5 | R | 74 | 3.836 |
| Postcentral gyrus | 63 | −31 | 43 | 1/2 | R | 52 | 3.836 |
| Supramarginal gyrus | −27 | −46 | 67 | 40 | L | 105 | 4.638 |
| Postcentral gyrus | −27 | −46 | 67 | 3 | L | 40 | 4.638 |
| Superior parietal lobule | −27 | −46 | 67 | L | 65 | 4.638 | |
| Inferior temporal gyrus | −57 | −64 | −11 | 20 | L | 121 | 4.293 |
Activations for the group TEAS at ST6 point compared with a resting baseline are shown (P < 0.005, cluster >20 voxels, uncorrected).
| Brain regions | MNI coordinates | BA | L/R | Voxels |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Middle temporal gyrus | −30 | −64 | 49 | 21 | L | 245 | 7.570 |
| Postcentral gyrus | −30 | −64 | 49 | 1/2/3/43 | L | 258 | 7.570 |
| Inferior parietal lobule | −30 | −64 | 49 | 5 | L | 874 | 7.570 |
| Middle frontal gyrus | −30 | −64 | 49 | 46 | L | 284 | 7.570 |
| Inferior frontal gyrus | 39 | 59 | −5 | 9 | R | 826 | 9.005 |
| Middle cingulate cortex | 39 | 59 | −5 | 31 | R | 56 | 9.005 |
| Postcentral gyrus | 39 | 59 | −5 | 1/2/3/43 | R | 338 | 9.005 |
| Precentral gyrus | 39 | 59 | −5 | 7 | R | 202 | 9.005 |
| Middle temporal gyrus | 63 | −64 | 11 | 37 | R | 123 | 4.795 |
| Middle frontal gyrus | −24 | 17 | 61 | 31 | L | 94 | 4.256 |
| Cerebellum posterior lobe | −15 | −85 | −47 | L | 907 | 7.627 | |
Activations for the group TEAS at sham point compared with a resting baseline are shown (P < 0.005, cluster >20 voxels, uncorrected).
| Brain regions | MNI coordinates | BA | L/R | Voxels |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Supramarginal gyrus | −54 | −67 | −18 | 40 | L | 29 | 2.579 |
| Superior temporal gyrus | −60 | −28 | 16 | 41 | L | 42 | 3.877 |
| Supramarginal gyrus | 66 | −34 | 31 | 22 | R | 21 | 3.382 |
| Cerebellum | −51 | −55 | −14 | L | 22 | 4.358 | |
Figure 3Comparison of brain regions activated between LI4 versus the sham acupoint. Yellow represents LI4 point activation. Red represents sham point activation. orange represent overlap regions. (P < 0.005, cluster >20 voxels, uncorrected).
Figure 4Comparison of brain regions activated between LI4 and ST6. red represent LI4 point activation. Yellow represents ST6 point activation. Orange represents overlap regions (P < 0.005, cluster >20 voxels, uncorrected).