| Literature DB >> 23737817 |
Chuanfu Li1, Jun Yang, Jinbo Sun, Chunsheng Xu, Yuanqiang Zhu, Qi Lu, Aihong Yuan, Yifang Zhu, Luoyi Li, Wei Zhang, Junping Liu, Jianjun Huang, Dongxiao Chen, Linying Wang, Wei Qin, Jie Tian.
Abstract
In recent years, neuroimaging studies of acupuncture have explored extensive aspects of brain responses to acupuncture in finding its underlying mechanisms. Most of these studies have been performed on healthy adults. Only a few studies have been performed on patients with diseases. Brain responses to acupuncture in patients with the same disease at different pathological stages have not been explored, although it may be more important and helpful in uncovering its underlying mechanisms. In the present study, we used fMRI to compare brain responses to acupuncture in patients with Bell's palsy at different pathological stages with normal controls and found that the brain response to acupuncture varied at different pathological stages of Bell's palsy. The brain response to acupuncture decreased in the early stages, increased in the later stages, and nearly returned to normal in the recovered group. All of the changes in the brain response to acupuncture could be explained as resulting from the changes in the brain functional status. Therefore, we proposed that the brain response to acupuncture is dependent on the brain functional status, while further investigation is needed to provide more evidence in support of this proposition.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23737817 PMCID: PMC3662123 DOI: 10.1155/2013/175278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Diagram for the acupuncture stimulation protocol. The needle was inserted into the skin before fMRI data acquisition. After remaining at rest for 2 min, the needle was rotated bidirectionally with an even motion at the rate of 1 Hz for 2 min. After another rest period of 3 min, needle manipulation was repeated in a similar manner for another 2 min. After that, scanning continued for 1 min. The needle was pulled out at the end of the 10 min.
Figure 2Demonstration of acupuncture sensation composition of different degrees in the four groups. The acupuncture sensations were labeled on the x-axis, including soreness (Sore), numbness (Numb), heaviness (Heav), fullness (Full), spreading (Sprd), and aching (Achg). The different degrees of sensations were marked with different colors as shown in the legend. The numbers on the y-axis indicated the cases for each kind of sensation.
Group analysis results of brain activation areas in the normal group.
| Group analysis | Regions (BA) | Side | Peak | Coordinate (Talairach) | Voxel size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak | Peak | Peak | |||||
| Lobule IX of cerebellum | R | 4.11 | −10.5 | 49.5 | −27.5 | 92 | |
| Middle cingulate gyrus (6) | L | 3.10 | 7.5 | 28.5 | 59.5 | 78 | |
| Rolandic operculum (43), SII | R | 3.51 | −49.5 | 16.5 | 17.5 | 71 | |
| Parahippocampal gyrus (38) | R | 3.57 | −22.5 | −7.5 | −33.5 | 69 | |
| Lobule IX of cerebellum | R | 3.51 | −7.5 | 55.5 | −30.5 | 58 | |
| Insula (13) | R | 3.59 | −31.5 | 19.5 | 8.5 | 57 | |
| Parahippocampal gyrus (20) | L | 4.05 | 28.5 | 13.5 | −27.5 | 43 | |
| Inferior frontal gyrus (45) | L | 3.93 | 55.5 | −16.5 | 5.5 | 38 | |
| Inferior temporal gyrus (37) | R | 3.60 | −55.5 | 55.5 | −3.5 | 37 | |
| Normal group | Lobule IX of cerebellum | L | 3.05 | 13.5 | 49.5 | −42.5 | 31 |
| Lobule III of cerebellum | R | 4.04 | −10.5 | 34.5 | −30.5 | 29 | |
| Insula (13) | L | 3.35 | 34.5 | 4.5 | −3.5 | 28 | |
| Lobule VIIIa of cerebellum | R | 3.30 | −13.5 | 70.5 | −48.5 | 27 | |
| Lobule VIIIb of cerebellum | R | 3.52 | −19.5 | 37.5 | −45.5 | 26 | |
| Supramarginal gyrus (13), SII | L | 2.97 | 49.5 | 22.5 | 23.5 | 25 | |
| Lingual gyrus (18) | R | 3.42 | −25.5 | 82.5 | −18.5 | 23 | |
| Superior temporal gyrus (22) | L | 3.63 | 46.5 | 16.5 | −0.5 | 22 | |
| Lobule VIIa of cerebellum | R | 3.62 | −16.5 | 79.5 | −21.5 | 21 | |
| Postcentral gyrus (3), SI | R | 3.20 | −19.5 | 34.5 | 62.5 | 20 | |
BA: Brodmann area; L: left; R: right; SI: primary somatosensory cortex; SII: secondary somatosensory cortex; the threshold was set to P ≤ 0.01, α ≤ 0.05 (corrected with the Monte Carlo method).
Figure 3Demonstration of the group analysis results of the normal, early, later, and recovered groups (P ≤ 0.01, α ≤ 0.05, corrected with the Monte Carlo method). In the normal group, the activated brain areas spread over the whole brain, including lobule IX (A1), middle cingulate gyrus (A2), Rolandic operculum (A3), parahippocampal gyrus (A4), lobule IX (A5), insula (A6), parahippocampal gyrus (A7), inferior frontal gyrus (A8), inferior temporal gyrus (A9), lobule IX (A10), lobule III (A11), insula (A12), lobule VIIIa (A13), lobule VIIIb (A14), supramarginal gyrus (A15), lingual gyrus (A16), superior temporal gyrus (A17), lobule VIIa (A18), and postcentral gyrus (A19). In the early group, the activated areas became only a few, including lobule IX (B1 and B4), lingual gyrus (B2), and middle cingulate gyrus (B6), and there appeared deactivated areas in the middle frontal gyrus (B3) and inferior temporal gyrus (B5). In the later group, the activated areas became more obvious and more intense than those in the normal group which were shown in lobule VIIa (C1), superior temporal gyrus (C2), fusiform gyrus (C3), lobule VI (C4), lingual gyrus (C5), middle temporal gyrus (C6), culmen of cerebellum (C7), lobule VI (C8), posterior cingulate gyrus (C9), thalamus (C10), parahippocampal gyrus (C11), lingual gyrus (C12), fusiform gyrus (C13), inferior frontal gyrus (C14), fusiform gyrus (C15), insula (C16), middle temporal gyrus (C17), lobule VI (C18), vermis of the cerebellum (C19), lobule VI (C20), and middle cingulate gyrus (C21). In the recovered group, no activated areas were found above the threshold (P ≤ 0.01, α ≤ 0.05).
Group analysis results of brain activation areas in each of the patient groups.
| Group analysis | Regions (BA) | Side | Peak | Coordinate (Talairach) | Voxel size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak | Peak | Peak | |||||
| Lobule IX of the cerebellum | L | 3.51 | 7.5 | 37.5 | −39.5 | 49 | |
| Lingual gyrus (18) | L | 3.32 | 7.5 | 73.5 | −9.5 | 35 | |
| Early group | Middle frontal gyrus (8) | L | −3.45 | 37.5 | −16.5 | 38.5 | 34 |
| Lobule IX of the cerebellum | L | 3.45 | 7.5 | 58.5 | −39.5 | 30 | |
| Inferior temporal gyrus (20) | R | −3.54 | −61.5 | 13.5 | −18.5 | 28 | |
| Middle cingulate gyrus(24) | R | 3.85 | −7.5 | 7.5 | 47.5 | 28 | |
|
| |||||||
| Lobule VIIa of the cerebellum | R | 3.66 | −16.5 | 79.5 | −21.5 | 98 | |
| Superior temporal gyrus (38) | R | 3.39 | −34.5 | −4.5 | −12.5 | 85 | |
| Fusiform gyrus (19) | R | 3.24 | −28.5 | 64.5 | −15.5 | 71 | |
| Lobule VI of the cerebellum | L | 3.48 | 22.5 | 61.5 | −24.5 | 68 | |
| Lingual gyrus (18) | L | 3.49 | 7.5 | 85.5 | −15.5 | 59 | |
| Middle temporal gyrus (19) | R | 3.16 | −43.5 | 61.5 | 14.5 | 58 | |
| Culmen of the cerebellum | L | 3.26 | 4.5 | 43.5 | −3.5 | 54 | |
| Lobule VI of the cerebellum | R | 3.79 | −28.5 | 64.5 | −21.5 | 50 | |
| Posterior cingulate gyrus (31) | R | 3.13 | −7.5 | 49.5 | 29.5 | 50 | |
| Thalamus | L | 3.61 | 10.5 | 25.5 | −3.5 | 49 | |
| Later group | Parahippocampal gyrus (30) | R | 4.78 | −13.5 | 37.5 | −6.5 | 49 |
| Lingual gyrus (18) | R | 3.35 | −13.5 | 82.5 | −12.5 | 37 | |
| Fusiform gyrus (36) | L | 3.80 | 49.5 | 46.5 | −24.5 | 36 | |
| Inferior frontal gyrus (47) | R | 4.17 | −43.5 | −19.5 | -6.5 | 35 | |
| Fusiform gyrus (19) | L | 4.48 | 37.5 | 76.5 | −18.5 | 32 | |
| Insula (13) | R | 3.07 | −43.5 | 19.5 | 17.5 | 29 | |
| Middle temporal gyrus (21) | R | 3.92 | −49.5 | 1.5 | −15.5 | 28 | |
| Lobule VI of the cerebellum | L | 3.54 | 16.5 | 70.5 | −21.5 | 27 | |
| Vermis of the cerebellum | L | 4.03 | −1.5 | 76.5 | −33.5 | 25 | |
| Lobule VI of the cerebellum | R | 2.95 | −13.5 | 58.5 | −15.5 | 22 | |
| Middle cingulate gyrus (24) | R | 3.18 | −4.5 | 4.5 | 35.5 | 20 | |
BA: Brodmann area; L: left; R: right; SII: secondary somatosensory cortex. The threshold was set to P ≤ 0.01, α ≤ 0.05 (corrected with the Monte Carlo method). No activated area was found above the threshold in the recovered group.
Intergroup comparison analysis results of brain activation differences between patients at three different pathological stages with normal controls (early versus normal, later versus normal, and recovery versus normal).
| Inter group | Regions (BA) | Side | Peak | Coordinate (Talairach) | Voxel size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak | Peak | Peak | |||||
| Early versus normal | Parahippocampal gyrus (28) | L | −3.81 | 25.5 | 13.5 | −27.5 | 45 |
| Parahippocampal gyrus (36) | R | −3.57 | −25.5 | 7.5 | −33.5 | 33 | |
|
| |||||||
| Lingual gyrus (18) | R | 3.73 | −4.5 | 82.5 | −12.5 | 69 | |
| Middle frontal gyrus (10) | R | 4.08 | −31.5 | −40.5 | 23.5 | 46 | |
| Later versus normal | Thalamus | L | 3.19 | 10.5 | 19.5 | −6.5 | 33 |
| Middle frontal gyrus (6) | R | 3.62 | −19.5 | −13.5 | 38.5 | 28 | |
| Precentral gyrus (4) | R | 3.27 | −55.5 | 13.5 | 38.5 | 28 | |
| Lobule VIIa of the cerebellum | L | 3.62 | 40.5 | 61.5 | −33.5 | 22 | |
BA: Brodmann area; L: left; R: right. The threshold was set to P ≤ 0.01, α ≤ 0.05 (corrected with the Monte Carlo method). No significant differences were found between the normal group and the recovered group.
Figure 4Intergroup comparison analysis results between the patients and the normal controls (P ≤ 0.01, α ≤ 0.05, corrected with the Monte Carlo method). With the comparison of early versus normal, decreased activations (early < normal) were demonstrated in the early group on both sides of parahippocampal gyrus (A1 and A2). With the comparison of later versus normal, increased activations (later > normal) were demonstrated in the later group in the lingual gyrus (B1), middle frontal gyrus (B2 and B4), thalamus (B3), precentral gyrus (B5), and lobule VIIa (B6). With the comparison of recovery versus normal, no activated areas were found above the threshold (P ≤ 0.01, α ≤ 0.05).