| Literature DB >> 26445668 |
Matsepo Taole1, Wubetu Bihon2, Brenda D Wingfield3, Michael J Wingfield4, Treena I Burgess5.
Abstract
Many population studies on invasive plant pathogens are undertaken without knowing the center of origin of the pathogen. Most leaf pathogens of Eucalyptus originate in Australia and consequently with indigenous populations available, and it is possible to study the pathways of invasion. Teratosphaeria suttonii is a commonly occurring leaf pathogen of Eucalyptus species, naturally distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of eastern Australia where it is regarded as a minor pathogen infecting older leaves; however, repeated infections, especially in exotic plantations, can result in severe defoliation and tree deaths. Nine polymorphic microsatellite markers were used to assess the genetic structure of 11 populations of T. suttonii of which four where from within its native range in eastern Australia and the remaining seven from exotic Eucalyptus plantations. Indigenous populations exhibited high allele and haplotype diversity, predominantly clonal reproduction, high population differentiation, and low gene flow. The diversity of the invasive populations varied widely, but in general, the younger the plantation industry in a country or region, the lower the diversity of T. suttonii. Historical gene flow was from Australia, and while self-recruitment was dominant in all populations, there was evidence for contemporary gene flow, with South Africa being the most common source and Uruguay the most common sink population. This points distinctly to human activities underlying long-distance spread of this pathogen, and it highlights lessons to be learned regarding quarantine.Entities:
Keywords: Forest biosecurity; Teratosphaeria suttonii; gene flow; microsatellite markers; plantation forestry
Year: 2015 PMID: 26445668 PMCID: PMC4588637 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1693
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Teratosphaeria suttonii isolates used in this study
| Origin | Coded | No. of isolates | Collector | Collection year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia; Davies Creek, north QLD | FNQ | 27 | MM Taole & K Taylor | 2010 |
| Australia; Koumala, central QLD | CQLD | 46 | MM Taole & K Taylor | 2010 |
| Australia, Miriam Vale, central QLD | CQLD | 8 | V Andjic | 2009 |
| Australia; Imbil, south QLD | SQLD | 47 | MM Taole & K Taylor | 2010 |
| Australia; Wedding Bells, NSW | NSW | 37 | AJ Carnegie | 2010 |
| Australia; Emu Creek, NSW | NSW | 3 | AJ Carnegie | 2010 |
| Australia; Kew, NSW | NSW | 6 | V Andjic | 2009 |
| Australia; Kimbel, NSW | NSW | 4 | V Andjic | 2009 |
| Australia; Neaves, NSW | NSW | 2 | V Andjic | 2009 |
| Australia; Tunglebung, NSW | NSW | 3 | MM Taole & K Taylor | 2010 |
| Australia; Morrow, NSW | NSW | 3 | MM Taole & K Taylor | 2010 |
| Australia; Myrtle Creek, NSW | NSW | 3 | AJ Carnegie | 2010 |
| Australia; Garas, NSW | NSW | 2 | MM Taole & K Taylor | 2010 |
| Australia; Manjimup, WA | WA | 11 | T Burgess | 2007 |
| Uruguay; La Negra | URY | 38 | MJ Wingfield | 2009 |
| Uruguay; Caldras | URY | 23 | MJ Wingfield | 2009 |
| United States of America; Florida | USA | 18 | MJ Wingfield | 2007 |
| China; Fujian Province | CHN | 32 | MJ Wingfield & TI Burgess | 2004 |
| Indonesia; Aek Nauli, Sumatra | IDN | 22 | PA Barber | 2004 |
| Vietnam; Dai Lai, Vinh Phuc Province | VTN | 17 | TI Burgess | 2006 |
| South Africa; Pretoria, Gauteng | ZAF | 36 | MM Taole | 2007 |
Population diversity parameters for the populations of Teratosphaeria suttonii
| Parameters | FNQ | CQLD | SQLD | NSW | WA | AUS | URY | USA | ZAF | VTN | IDN | CHN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ni | 27 | 54 | 47 | 61 | 11 | 200 | 61 | 18 | 36 | 19 | 32 | 40 |
| Nh | 15 | 39 | 44 | 43 | 3 | 144 | 5 | 13 | 16 | 13 | 32 | 28 |
| Na | 2.75 | 4.88 | 4.13 | 4.63 | 1.13 | 8.13 | 2.25 | 2.00 | 2.25 | 2.13 | 3.75 | 3.00 |
| Ne | 2.08 ± 0.34 | 2.73 ± 0.36 | 2.41 ± 0.38 | 3.22 ± 0.62 | 1.1 ± 0.10 | 4.21 ± 0.7 | 1.86 ± 0.32 | 1.63 ± 0.2 | 1.52 ± 0.18 | 1.68 ± 0.16 | 2.32 ± 0.28 | 1.65 ± 0.23 |
| Nua | 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| %P | 87.5 | 87.5 | 100 | 87.5 | 12.5 | 100 | 62.5 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 87.5 |
| P | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| Ar | 2.35 ± 0.33 | 3.91 ± 0.54 | 3.34 ± 0.41 | 3.72 ± 0.60 | 1.10 ± 0.10 | 6.82 ± 0.88 | 1.72 ± 0.23 | 1.79 ± 0.25 | 1.88 ± 0.31 | 1.89 ± 0.12 | 2.48 ± 0.62 | 2.36 ± 0.29 |
| Pa | 0.25 ± 0.16 | 0.75 ± 0.41 | 0.50 ± 0.27 | 0.25 ± 0.16 | 0.13 ± 0.13 | 3.5 ± 0.96 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | 0.25 ± 0.16 | Absent |
| H | 0.44 ± 0.08 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 0.49 ± 0.09 | 0.59 ± 0.09 | 0.06 ± 0.56 | 0.67 ± 0.09 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.32 ± 0.08 | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.07 | 0.32 ± 0.08 |
| rBarD | 0.138 | 0.234 | 0.025 | 0.087 | na | 0.079 | 0.289 | 0.257 | −0.032 | −0.014 | 0.05 | 0.095 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.022 | <0.001 | na | <0.001 | 0.043 | <0.001 | 0.848 | 0.692 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
Ni: total number of isolates (nonclone corrected); Nh; number of haplotypes; Na: mean number of alleles; Ne: mean number of effective alleles ± standard error; Nua: number of unique alleles; %P: Percentage polymorphic loci; P: number of polymorphic loci (eight loci considered); Ar: allelic richness; mean ± standard error; Pa: private alleles; mean ± standard error; H: Gene diversity (Nei 1973).
Figure 1Assignment of and gene flow between populations of Teratosphaeria suttonii. (A) Genetic clustering (k = 7) of the 11 populations using eight microsatellite markers. Each bar represents an individual MLH divided populations and the colors code for the proportion (out of 1) of membership to each cluster. (B) Neighbor‐joining phenogram based on Nei's genetic distance showing the relationship between the seven clusters. (C) Neighbor‐joining phenogram based on Nei's genetic distance showing the relationship between the 11 populations. (D) Pie charts placed depicting the proportion of membership of each population to each cluster with lines depicting the relative intensity of gene flow between introduced populations (see Table S4) and arrows indicating the direction.
Figure 2A network showing relationships between the global populations of Teratosphaeria suttonii. Each circle represents cluster of related haplotypes, the size of the circle corresponds to the number of MLHs in each cluster; the colors correspond to geographic regions as given in the legend. The numbers on the branches represent the number of mutations.