Literature DB >> 26444893

An Overview of Biorepositories-Past, Present, and Future.

Martina Siwek1.   

Abstract

The collection, storage, and distribution of biological materials for research and improving health have been employed for more than a century. Biorepositories have been used to maintain and reallocate these specimens. Historically, the Department of Defense (DoD) has been maintaining biorepositories and using the materials stored to expand our understanding of diseases and for developing medical countermeasures since the Civil War. Other U.S. Government and nongovernmental organizations are also engaged in curating human and other samples for future studies, as are organizations in other countries. The reasons for collection and the possible uses of specimens maintained within repositories have changed with the advent of novel technologies and the genomics discipline. However, over the years, many of the issues faced by repositories have remained largely the same, although of increased importance more recently because of limited funding and enhanced ethical concerns. These issues include what samples to collect; how to collect, transport, and store the samples; legal and ethical matters relating to sample collection and use; durability of analytes of interest in stored specimens; assessing the quality of stored specimens and providing researchers with statements of specimen quality; costs; maintenance and sustainability of the repository; and, implementing and maintaining laboratory quality programs and possibly accreditation. National and international scientific groups are working to identify and define best practices, but universal standards and practices remain challenges for the future. To begin addressing the above issues, the DoD implemented several initiatives, which are described elsewhere in this Military Medicine Supplement. Additionally, staff members working on the issues saw potential value in identifying other biorepository groups and similar work being done by these groups with the expectation of developing lines of communication and, eventually, even collaboration in establishing universal standards and practices. The repositories identified are briefly discussed in this report. Reprint &
Copyright © 2015 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26444893     DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  3 in total

1.  Creation of Data Repositories to Advance Nursing Science.

Authors:  Joseph Perazzo; Margaret Rodriguez; Jackson Currie; Robert Salata; Allison R Webel
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Bridging gaps between images and data: a systematic update on imaging biobanks.

Authors:  Michela Gabelloni; Lorenzo Faggioni; Rita Borgheresi; Giuliana Restante; Jorge Shortrede; Lorenzo Tumminello; Camilla Scapicchio; Francesca Coppola; Dania Cioni; Ignacio Gómez-Rico; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  How Semantics Connotations May Influence Concerns About Donation of Biospecimens.

Authors:  Stacey A Page; Beverly Anne Collisson; Jenny Godley; Danny Nguyen; Luanne Metz; Daniel Muruve
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.256

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.