Literature DB >> 26444729

Daclizumab HYP versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

Ludwig Kappos1, Heinz Wiendl, Krzysztof Selmaj, Douglas L Arnold, Eva Havrdova, Alexey Boyko, Michael Kaufman, John Rose, Steven Greenberg, Marianne Sweetser, Katherine Riester, Gilmore O'Neill, Jacob Elkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Daclizumab high-yield process (HYP) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to CD25 (alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor) and modulates interleukin-2 signaling. Abnormalities in interleukin-2 signaling have been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study involving 1841 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis to compare daclizumab HYP, administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg every 4 weeks, with interferon beta-1a, administered intramuscularly at a dose of 30 μg once weekly, for up to 144 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate.
RESULTS: The annualized relapse rate was lower with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a (0.22 vs. 0.39; 45% lower rate with daclizumab HYP; P<0.001). The number of new or newly enlarged hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a period of 96 weeks was lower with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a (4.3 vs. 9.4; 54% lower number of lesions with daclizumab HYP; P<0.001). At week 144, the estimated incidence of disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was 16% with daclizumab HYP and 20% with interferon beta-1a (P=0.16). Serious adverse events, excluding relapse of multiple sclerosis, were reported in 15% of the patients in the daclizumab HYP group and in 10% of those in the interferon beta-1a group. Infections were more common in the daclizumab HYP group than in the interferon beta-1a group (in 65% vs. 57% of the patients, including serious infection in 4% vs. 2%), as were cutaneous events such as rash or eczema (in 37% vs. 19%, including serious events in 2% vs. <1%) and elevations in liver aminotransferase levels that were more than 5 times the upper limit of the normal range (in 6% vs. 3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, daclizumab HYP showed efficacy superior to that of interferon beta-1a with regard to the annualized relapse rate and lesions, as assessed by means of MRI, but was not associated with a significantly lower risk of disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks. The rates of infection, rash, and abnormalities on liver-function testing were higher with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a. (Funded by Biogen and AbbVie Biotherapeutics; DECIDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01064401.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26444729     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  77 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimmunotherapies Targeting T Cells: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Stefan Bittner; Heinz Wiendl
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Recent Advances in Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Bharath Wootla; Jens O Watzlawik; Nikolaos Stavropoulos; Nathan J Wittenberg; Harika Dasari; Murtada A Abdelrahim; John R Henley; Sang-Hyun Oh; Arthur E Warrington; Moses Rodriguez
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 3.  Daclizumab: Development, Clinical Trials, and Practical Aspects of Use in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Laura E Baldassari; John W Rose
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 4.  Biotherapy in Inflammatory Diseases of the CNS: Current Knowledge and Applications.

Authors:  Nicolas Collongues; Laure Michel; Jérôme de Seze
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Daclizumab.

Authors:  Anne P Kim; Danial E Baker
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-12

Review 6.  [New aspects of immunotherapy in multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  K Pape; F Zipp; S Bittner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 7.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Massimo Filippi; Amit Bar-Or; Fredrik Piehl; Paolo Preziosa; Alessandra Solari; Sandra Vukusic; Maria A Rocca
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 8.  Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: emergence of B-cell-targeted therapies.

Authors:  Ai-Lan Nguyen; Melissa Gresle; Tessa Marshall; Helmut Butzkueven; Judith Field
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  Some recent advances in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Claire McCarthy; John Thorpe
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Cancer Risk in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Potential Impact of Disease-Modifying Drugs.

Authors:  Christine Lebrun; Fanny Rocher
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.