Literature DB >> 26443486

Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.

Melanie A Zokoll1, Dilek Fidan2, Didem Türkyılmaz3, Sabine Hochmuth1, İclâl Ergenç4, Gonca Sennaroğlu3, Birger Kollmeier1,5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Turkish matrix sentence test, TURMatrix, was developed for precise, internationally comparable speech intelligibility testing.
DESIGN: The TURMatrix comprises a base matrix of ten well-known Turkish names, numbers, adjectives, objects, verbs, from which syntactically fixed sentences were randomly composed. Test conduction may be in an open-set (standard), or closed-set response format. Homogeneity in intelligibility of the test material was optimized by applying level adaptations (maximal ± 3 dB) based on word-specific speech reception thresholds (SRTs). Test list equivalence was verified and reference values were determined. STUDY SAMPLE: Thirty-eight native listeners of Turkish with normal hearing.
RESULTS: After training, mean SRT and slope of the final test lists were -8.3 ± 0.2 dB SNR and 14.1 ± 1.0%/dB, respectively (fixed SNR measurements; inter-list variability). For adaptive measurements, average across listeners was -7.2 ± 0.7 dB SNR in the open-set and -7.9 ± 0.7 dB SNR in the closed-set response format. Mean SRT for adaptive measurements in the open-set response format in quiet was 20.3 ± 4.1 dB. Individual SRTs in quiet correlated more closely with audiograms than with SRTs in noise.
CONCLUSIONS: The TURMatrix was developed according to European standards and provides reliable speech intelligibility measurements in noise and quiet.

Keywords:  Speech audiometry; matrix sentence test, Turkish; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); speech reception threshold (SRT); speech recognition in noise

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26443486     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test.

Authors:  Zahra Polat; Erdoğan Bulut; Ahmet Ataş
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 2.  [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].

Authors:  T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments.

Authors:  Ahmet Kara; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcioglu; Çağlayan Adigul; Merve Torun Topcu; Mehmet Koçoğlu; Bilgehan Celik; Mahmut Sinan Yilmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?

Authors:  Brandi Jett; Emily Buss; Virginia Best; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikolai Bernhard; Ulrich Gauger; Eugenia Romo Ventura; Florian C Uecker; Heidi Olze; Steffen Knopke; Toni Hänsel; Annekatrin Coordes
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Evaluation of Speech Recognition Skills in Different Noises with the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test in Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Bünyamin Çıldır; Suna Tokgöz-Yılmaz
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.