Literature DB >> 26442150

Rapid identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii using a modified Carba NP test.

S Bakour1, V Garcia2, L Loucif2, J-M Brunel3, A Gharout-Sait4, A Touati4, J-M Rolain2.   

Abstract

Biochemical tests have been previously developed to identify carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp. (Carba NP test) and Acinetobacter spp. (CarbAcineto NP test). We evaluated a modified Carba NP test to detect carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species using a single protocol with rapid results and found good reliability and speed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carba NP test; Gram negative; carbapenemase; carbapenems; multidrug-resistant bacteria

Year:  2015        PMID: 26442150      PMCID: PMC4552816          DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbes New Infect        ISSN: 2052-2975


Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are increasingly being reported worldwide. The spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species have become a global threat. The emergence of resistance to carbapenems makes the treatment for infections caused by these carbapenem-resistant strains very limited [1-3]. Different types of carbapenemases have been reported, such as Ambler class A Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and Guiana extended spectrum (GES) β-lactamase, Ambler class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) and Ambler class D oxacillinase type [1]. Rapid methods for detecting carbapenemase producers have been described, such as the MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) carbapenemase assay [4]. Previous studies have described a rapid biochemical carbapenemase detection method based on imipenem hydrolysis, the Carba NP test, for Enterobacteriaceae[5] and Pseudomonas species [6], as well as the CarbAcineto NP test for Acinetobacter species [7]. Recently, however, several authors have published evaluations of the Carba NP and the CarbAcineto NP tests; their criticisms focussed essentially on the absence of detection of oxacillinase (OXA) type carbapenemases [8-10]. Here we describe a modified Carba NP (MCNP) test which enables the rapid detection of different carbapenemases (KPC, MBL and OXA types) from Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species using a single protocol. One hundred ten previously characterized GNB, including 69 carbapenemase-producing GNB (Enterobacteriaceae n = 14, Pseudomonas aeruginosa n = 11 and Acinetobacter baumannii n = 44), and 41 non-carbapenemase-producing GNB, including Enterobacteriaceae (n = 24), P. aeruginosa (n = 5) and A. baumannii (n = 12), were tested in two laboratories including Unité de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses et tropicales émergentes (URMITE), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France, and Microbial Ecology laboratory, Béjaia University, Béjaia, Algeria (Table 1). Carbapenemase activity was assessed using phenotypic and genotypic tests, including the modified Hodge test, MALDI-TOF MS assay, PCR amplification and sequencing [4,11].
Table 1

Test results for Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii strains

GroupSpeciesCarbapenemase or other β-lactamase geneTest result by:
MHTMALDI-TOF MSMCNP
EnterobacteriaceaeKlebsiella pneumoniae H5500MNDM-1+++
K. pneumoniae KpnaseyMNDM-1+++
K. pneumoniae U2A 2246MKPC-3+++
K. pneumoniaeAKPC-3+++
K. pneumoniae 360MKPC-2+++
K. pneumoniaeMOXA-48+++
K. pneumoniae 413ATEM-1/CTX-M-3/SHV-12/DHA-1−−−
K. pneumoniae 473ATEM-1/CTX-M-15/OXA-1−−−
K. pneumoniae 463ATEM-1/CTX-M-15−−−
K. pneumoniae 550ATEM-1/CTX-M-3−−−
K. pneumoniae 47ATEM-1/CMY-4−−−
K. pneumoniae 123ATEM-1/CMY-4−−−
K. pneumoniae 318ACTX-M-15−−−
K. pneumoniae 476ACTX-M-15−−−
K. pneumoniae 613ACMY-4−−−
K. pneumoniae 615ACMY-4−−−
Escherichia coli H5636MNDM-1+++
E. coli 181ANDM-5+++
E. coliMNDM-5+++
E. coli 99AOXA-48+++
E. coli 100AOXA-48+++
E. coli 132AOXA-48+++
E. coli 192AOXA-48+++
E. coliMOXA-48+++
E. coli 544ATEM-1/CTX-M-15/OXA-1−−−
E. coli 469ATEM-1/CTX-M-3/OXA-1−−−
E. coli 472ATEM-1/CTX-M-3/OXA-1−−−
E. coli 234ATEM-1/CTX-M-15/CMY-4−−−
E. coli 611ATEM-1/CTX-M-15/CMY-4−−−
E. coli 536ATEM-1/CTX-M-15−−−
E. coli 534ACTX-M-15/OXA-1−−−
E. coli 542ACTX-M-15/OXA-1−−−
E. coli 560ATEM-1/CMY-4−−−
E. coli 606ATEM-1/CMY-4−−−
E. coli ATCC 25922M—−−−
E. coli 7624M—−−−
E. cloacae 308ATEM-1/CTX-M-15/OXA-1−−−
E. cloacae 570ATEM-1/CTX-M-15−−−
PseudomonasP. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaMVIM-2+++
P. aeruginosaM—−−−
P. aeruginosaM—−−−
P. aeruginosaM—−−−
P. aeruginosaM—−−−
P. aeruginosaM—−−−
P. aeruginosa UAA 2257MIMP-1+++
AcinetobacterA. baumanniiAOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-24+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-58+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23/OXA-24+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23/OXA-24+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23/OXA-24+++
A. baumanniiANDM-1+++
A. baumanniiANDM-1+++
A. baumanniiANDM-1+++
A. baumanniiANDM-1+++
A. baumanniiANDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMNDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMNDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMNDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMNDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMNDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiMOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiAOXA-23/NDM-1+++
A. baumanniiATEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiATEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiATEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiATEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiATEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiATEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiATEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiMTEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiMTEM-128−−−
A. baumanniiMTEM-128−−−
A. baumannii AYEMVEB-1−−−
A. baumannii SDFM—−−−

MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; MCNP, modified Carba NP test; MHT, modified Hodge test.

AStrains tested in Microbial Ecology Laboratory, Béjaia University, Béjaia, Algeria.

MStrains tested in Unité de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses et tropicales émergentes (URMITE), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

The Carba NP and the CarbAcineto NP tests are straightforward biochemical tests which identify carbapenemase production in GNB by detecting imipenem hydrolysis using phenol red solution as a colour indicator and a bacterial lysis buffer (B-PER II, Bacterial Protein Extraction Reagent) for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas species (Carba NP test) [5,6] and 5 M NaCl for Acinetobacter species (CarbAcineto NP test) [7]. In order to use a single protocol to detect the production of carbapenemases in the three types of bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter) and to accelerate the speed with which results are produced, the lysis buffer and pH of the colour indicator solution used in the Carba NP and CarbAcineto NP tests were changed. In the MCNP test, the lysis buffers used for the Carba NP test and CarbAcineto NP test, B-PER II, Bacterial Protein Extraction Reagent and NaCl 5 M, respectively, were replaced by cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) 0.02%, and the pH value of the phenol red solution was adjusted to 7.5 (instead of 7.8). In addition, two steps used in the previous protocols [5,6], centrifugation and incubation at room temperature for 30 minutes, were eliminated in our method. These modifications simplify the lysis step and produce results more quickly. The MCNP test was performed as follows. One inoculation loop (10 μL) of the tested strain, directly recovered from a Mueller Hinton agar plate (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, France), was resuspended in 200 μL of 0.02% CTAB (Sigma-Aldrich Chimie, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) and vortexed for 1 to 2 minutes. Subsequently, 100 μL of the bacterial suspension was mixed with 100 μL of diluted phenol red solution (2 mL of phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich) solution 0.5% (wt/vol) with 16.6 mL of distilled water) containing 0.1 mM ZnSO4 (pH 7.5) in the first tube, tube 1, used as negative control, and a diluted phenol red solution containing 0.1 mM ZnSO4 (pH 7.5) supplemented with 6 mg/mL of commercially available imipenem (Tienam 500; Merck Sharp & Dohme, Paris, France) in the second tube, tube 2. Tubes 1 and 2 were vortexed, then incubated at 37°C for a maximum of 2 hours. Carbapenemase activity was revealed when the test and negative control solutions, respectively, were yellow vs. red or orange vs. red. In contrast, both solutions remained red in the case of noncarbapenemase producers (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Modified Carba NP test results for Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species. (A) Escherichia coli ATCC 25922. (B) NDM-5-positive E. coli. (C) KPC-2-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae 360. (D) IMP-1-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa UAA 2257. (E) OXA-23-positive Acinetobacter baumannii. (F) OXA-24-positive A. baumannii. (G) NDM-1-positive A. baumannii. (a) Tube containing phenol red solution 0.1 mM ZnSO4 (pH 7.5) and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) 0.02%. (b) Tube containing phenol red solution 0.1 mM ZnSO4 (pH 7.5) supplemented with 6 mg/mL of imipenem and CTAB 0.02%.

The results showed that the MCNP method detected all carbapenemases produced by carbapenem-resistant strains with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Positive results were observed at different times for the different carbapenemases types (MBL, KPC and OXA-48 at 10 to 30 minutes vs. 1 to 2 hours for OXA type). The most interesting aspect of this method is that the colour changed from red to orange or yellow (positive result) even before incubation in some cases (NDM-5-producing Escherichia coli, NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kpnasey) and imipenem-producing P. aeruginosa UAA2257). Moreover, a higher inoculums (two inoculation loops (10 μL)) is recommended for Acinetobacter species tests. Currently, the MCNP test is routinely used in Timone Hospital, Marseille, France. It was performed when antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed a resistance to ertapenem and susceptibility or resistance to imipenem. The suspicion of carbapenemase producers, in particular OXA-48, was based on this phenotype. Between November 2014 and May 2015, a total of 233 strains were tested. Among them, 35 positives strains with carbapenemase producers were detected (Table 2). These positives strains were isolated from 25 different patients. These results confirm the efficiency of the MCNP test with high sensitivity, given the detection of all strains producing OXA-48-type carbapenemases. Also, two carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii were detected, thus confirming the advantages of the MCNP test.
Table 2

Results of MCNP test applied for carbapenem-resistant strains isolated in La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France

DateSample sourceStrainAntibiotic susceptibility testing results
MCNP resultCarbapenemases gene detected
ETPIMP
10/11/2014UrineKlebsiella pneumoniaeRR+OXA-48
20/11/2014Rectal swabEscherichia coliRS+OXA-48
25/11/2014Bronchoalveolar lavage fluidK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
05/12/2014Bronchoalveolar lavage fluidK. pneumoniaeRR+OXA-48
08/12/2014Rectal swabK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
09/12/2014Blood cultureK. pneumoniaeRR+OXA-48
11/12/2014UrineEnterobacter cloacaeRS+OXA-48
21/12/2014StoolsK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
31/12/2014SpittleK. pneumoniaeRR+OXA-48
12/01/2015UrineE. coliRS+OXA-48
24/01/2015Armpit swabK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
02/02/2015Rectal swabK. pneumoniaeRR+NDM
06/02/2015UrineE. coliRS+OXA-48
17/02/2015UrineE. coliRS+OXA-48
19/02/2015SpittleK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
20/02/2015Rectal swabK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
23/02/2015UrineK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
04/03/2015Rectal swabE. cloacaeRR+OXA-48
04/03/2015Rectal swabK. pneumoniaeRR+OXA-48
16/03/2015Rectal swabK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
23/03/2015Bronchial aspirateK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
30/03/2015Armpit swabK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
31/03/2015UrineK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
13/04/2015SinusSerratia marcescensRR+OXA-48
13/04/2015Blood cultureE. cloacaeRS+OXA-48
18/04/2015Blood cultureE. coliRI+OXA-48
18/04/2015Rectal swabK. pneumoniaeRS+OXA-48
18/04/2015Blood cultureE. coliRI+OXA-48
04/05/2015UrineK. pneumoniaeRR+OXA-48
30/04/2015UrineK. pneumoniaeRI+NDM-1
07/05/2015Bronchial aspirateK. pneumoniaeRI+OXA-48
08/05/2015Blood cultureAcinetobacter baumanniiNTR+OXA-23
11/05/2015UrineA. baumanniiNTR+OXA-23
18/05/2015Rectal swabK. pneumoniaeRI+OXA-48

ETP, ertapenem; IMP, imipenem; MCNP, modified Carba NP test; NT, not tested; R, resistant; S, susceptible; I, Intermediate.

In conclusion, the advantages of the MCNP test are the detection of different carbapenemase types from Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species using a single protocol, as well as the short time to results, particularly in the case of MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas species. In addition, the effectiveness of this test on a large series of bacteria may allow us to identify the production of carbapenemase enzymes even before identification of the bacterial strain. Interestingly, as well as using this test in developed countries such as France (URMITE laboratories, La Timone Hospital), given the simplicity and the low cost of the MCNP test, it could be used by any laboratory, including laboratories in developing countries. In Algeria, this test has been used in the Microbial Ecology Laboratory of Béjaia University since May 2014, and it will soon be introduced to laboratories in Algerian hospitals.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  11 in total

1.  Improved performance of the modified Hodge test with MacConkey agar for screening carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Kyungwon Lee; Chang Ki Kim; Dongeun Yong; Seok Hoon Jeong; Jong Hwa Yum; Young Hee Seo; Jean-Denis Docquier; Yunsop Chong
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  MALDI-TOF MS detection of carbapenemase activity in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii compared against the Carba-NP assay.

Authors:  Patrick M Chong; Stuart J McCorrister; Mark S Unger; David A Boyd; Michael R Mulvey; Garrett R Westmacott
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Evaluation of the Carba NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Nathalie Tijet; David Boyd; Samir N Patel; Michael R Mulvey; Roberto G Melano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  CarbAcineto NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter spp.

Authors:  Laurent Dortet; Laurent Poirel; Caroline Errera; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas spp.

Authors:  Laurent Dortet; Laurent Poirel; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Emergence of resistance to carbapenems in Acinetobacter baumannii in Europe: clinical impact and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Marie Kempf; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 7.  Global evolution of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clonal lineages.

Authors:  Raffaele Zarrilli; Spyros Pournaras; Maria Giannouli; Athanassios Tsakris
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 5.283

8.  Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Patrice Nordmann; Laurent Poirel; Laurent Dortet
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Rapid detection of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Marie Kempf; Sofiane Bakour; Christophe Flaudrops; Meryem Berrazeg; Jean-Michel Brunel; Mourad Drissi; Esma Mesli; Abdelaziz Touati; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Worldwide dissemination of the NDM-type carbapenemases in Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Laurent Dortet; Laurent Poirel; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Carbapenem-Resistant Non-Glucose-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli: the Missing Piece to the Puzzle.

Authors:  Thomas J Gniadek; Karen C Carroll; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Carbapenemase Detection among Carbapenem-Resistant Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; Belita N A Opene; Krizia K Chambers; Matthew E Naumann; Karen C Carroll; Pranita D Tamma
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  No global increase in resistance to antibiotics: a snapshot of resistance from 2001 to 2016 in Marseille, France.

Authors:  Stéphanie Le Page; Gregory Dubourg; Sophie Alexandra Baron; Jean-Marc Rolain; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Comparison of 11 Phenotypic Assays for Accurate Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Belita N A Opene; Andrew Gluck; Krizia K Chambers; Karen C Carroll; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multicenter Performance Assessment of Carba NP Test.

Authors:  Scott A Cunningham; Brandi Limbago; Maria Traczewski; Karen Anderson; Meredith Hackel; Janet Hindler; Dan Sahm; Efe Alyanak; Adrian Lawsin; Christopher A Gulvik; Tom J B de Man; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Audrey N Schuetz; Stephen Jenkins; Romney Humphries; Elizabeth Palavecino; Shawn Vasoo; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms from Clinical Isolates.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  First Report of German Cockroaches (Blattella germanica) as Reservoirs of CTX-M-15 Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and OXA-48 Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Batna University Hospital, Algeria.

Authors:  Lotfi Loucif; Djamila Gacemi-Kirane; Zineb Cherak; Naima Chamlal; Nadia Grainat; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in animals and methodologies for their detection.

Authors:  Rebecca E V Anderson; Patrick Boerlin
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.310

9.  Outbreak of OXA-48-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Involving a Sequence Type 101 Clone in Batna University Hospital, Algeria.

Authors:  Lotfi Loucif; Ahmed Kassah-Laouar; Mahdia Saidi; Amina Messala; Widad Chelaghma; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method and the Carba NP for Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; J Kristie Johnson; William B Brasso; Karen Anderson; David R Lonsway; Virginia M Pierce; April M Bobenchik; Zabrina C Lockett; Angella Charnot-Katsikas; Lars F Westblade; Brian B Yoo; Stephen G Jenkins; Brandi M Limbago; Sanchita Das; Darcie E Roe-Carpenter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.