| Literature DB >> 26441898 |
Qiu-E Yang1, Jian Sun1, Liang Li1, Hui Deng1, Bao-Tao Liu1, Liang-Xing Fang1, Xiao-Ping Liao1, Ya-Hong Liu2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to characterize a collection of 103 multidrug resistance IncF plasmids recovered from Escherichia coli of food producing and companion animals between 2003 and 2012. A total of 103 incF plasmids were characterized using an established PCR-based IncF replicon sequence typing (RST) system to identify FII, FIA, and FIB (FAB) groups. Plasmids were also analyzed using-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Antibiotic Resistance determinants bla CTX-M , plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes and rmtB and plasmid addiction systems (PAS) were identified by PCR screening. A total of 20 different RSTs from 103 IncF plasmids were identified. The groups F2 and F33 with the RST formulae A-: B- were the most frequently encountered types (63.1%). The antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) bla CTX-M , rmtB, and oqxB were carried by 82, 37, and 34 IncF plasmids, respectively. Most of these plasmids carried more than one resistance gene (59.2%, 61/103). The IncF plasmids also had a high frequency of addiction systems (mean 2.54) and two antisense RNA-regulated systems (hok-sok and srnBC) and a protein antitoxin-regulated system (pemKI) were the most prevalent. Not surprisingly, RFLP profiles among the IncF plasmids were diverse even though some shared identical IncF-RSTs. This is the first extensive study of IncF plasmid-positive E. coli isolates from animals in China. Our results demonstrate that IncF is the most prevalent plasmid family in E. coli plasmids and they commonly carry multiple resistance determinants that render them resistant to different antibiotic classes simultaneously. IncF plasmids also harbor addiction systems, promoting their stability and maintenance in the bacterial host, under changing environmental conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; IncF plasmid; RFLP; addiction systems; multi-resistance
Year: 2015 PMID: 26441898 PMCID: PMC4585273 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00964
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
The distribution of addiction systems and resistance genes according to FAB type identified in the 103 multi-resistance plasmids.
| F2:A-:B- | 35(70~194) | 28 | 18 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 3 | 66 | 1.9 | 5 | 8 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| F2:A1:B- | 3(120~145) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| F2:A1:B1 | 2(145~194) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| F2:A-:B10 | 1(~120) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F14:A-:B- | 1(ND) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F16:A-:B- | 3(~97) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| F16:A-:B1 | 1(~60) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F18:A-:B- | 3(135~145) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F18:A-:B1 | 1(145~194) | 8 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 2.9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F18:A-:B8 | 1(~194) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F31:A4:B1 | 3(~194) | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F33:A-:B- | 30(60~194) | 26 | 25 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 84 | 2.8 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F33:A1:B- | 1(ND) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F33:A-:B1 | 1(ND) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F35:A-:B- | 3(~97) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F36:A1:B1 | 1(~160) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F43:A-:B- | 1(~110) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| F43:A3:B- | 1(~145) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| F46:A-:B24 | 1(~130) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| F58:A-:B- | 1(~145) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total No. | 103 | 86 | 64 | 59 | 18 | 29 | 6 | 262 | 2.54 | 30 | 20 | 14 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 34 | 3 | 11 | 6 |
M55/14/27/65/15/3/24 is resistance genes abbreviations for blaCTX−M−55∕14∕27∕65∕15∕3∕24, respectively.
ND, not determined.
Figure 1RFLP patterns and characterization of multi-resistance 25 F2: A-: B- plasmids.
Figure 3RFLP patterns and characterization of multi-resistance 27 F33: A-: B- plasmids. The scale on the top left of the figure indicates the percentage of similarity for the EcoRI restriction profiles of the IncF plasmids. aAntimicrobial for which the plasmids MICs fell within the resistant range; Antimicrobial abbreviations: A, ampicillin; S, streptomycin; M, amikacin; K, kanamycin; G, gentamycin; R, ceftriaxone; C, cefotaxime; CT, ceftiofur; N, nalidixic acid; P, ciprofloxacin; E, enrofloxacin; L, levoflox-acin; O, olaquindox; T, tetracycline; H, chloramphenicol and F, florfenicol. bPlasmids with a DSI ≥80% were assigned to the same cluster (designated with numbers 1, 2, 3, 4 etc.). Letters were used to discriminate RFLP patterns assigned to the same cluster, but differing by one or two restriction bands (i.e., 1a, 1b, 1c etc.). ND, not determined.