| Literature DB >> 26441861 |
Lesley A Ogilvie1, Brian V Jones2.
Abstract
Here, we outline our current understanding of the human gut virome, in particular the phage component of this ecosystem, highlighting progress, and challenges in viral discovery in this arena. We reveal how developments in high-throughput sequencing technologies and associated data analysis methodologies are helping to illuminate this abundant 'biological dark matter.' Current evidence suggests that the human gut virome is a highly individual but temporally stable collective, dominated by phages exhibiting a temperate lifestyle. This viral community also appears to encode a surprisingly rich functional repertoire that confers a range of attributes to their bacterial hosts, ranging from bacterial virulence and pathogenesis to maintaining host-microbiome stability and community resilience. Despite the significant advances in our understanding of the gut virome in recent years, it is clear that we remain in a period of discovery and revelation, as new methods and technologies begin to provide deeper understanding of the inherent ecological characteristics of this viral ecosystem. As our understanding increases, the nature of the multi-partite interactions occurring between host and microbiome will become clearer, helping us to more rationally define the concepts and principles that will underpin approaches to using human gut virome components for medical or biotechnological applications.Entities:
Keywords: bacteriophage; dysbiosis; human gut microbiome; metagenomics; phage-encoded functions; virus-like particles
Year: 2015 PMID: 26441861 PMCID: PMC4566309 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Benefits and limitations of commonly used methods for accessing the human gut virome.
| Method | Description | Benefits | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| – Plaque-based assays | Isolation of phages from a biological sample using a cultured bacterial host | • Essential tool that has underpinned our understanding of phage-host interactions | • Culture dependent |
| • Bacterial host is known | • Limited range of bacterial hosts, due to inability to culture >99% of bacteria | ||
| • Host–phage dynamics can be investigated in real time | • Recapitulation of | ||
| • Inexpensive | |||
| • Accessible for most laboratories | |||
| • Amenable to testing hypotheses | |||
| – Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) | Visualization of viruses following negative staining | • Culture independent | • No functional information |
| • Provides | • No host range information unless used to view purified phages propagated on a culturable bacterial host | ||
| • Provides information of morphological diversity of viral/phage types | • Requires high virus like particle/phage titres for visualization | ||
| • Useful as supplement to other approaches | • Phages with unusual capsid structures, e.g., Inoviridiae, may be difficult to identify | ||
| – Fluorescence | Visualization of viruses following staining by DNA fluorochromes | • Culture independent | • As for TEM, but additionally, information on viral structure and morphology is not provided, with information largely restricted to viral numbers |
| • Quantitative | |||
| • Rapid | |||
| • Cost effective | |||
| • Broad overview of viral numbers | |||
| – PCR/quantitative PCR | • Amplification of DNA segments using primers targeting a specific genomic section | • Culture independent | • Lack of conserved genes within all phages akin to the 16S rRNA gene in bacteria |
| • View of viral/phage abundance and diversity limited to available sequence data from which primers are designed | |||
| – Large/small insert metagenomic libraries | • Isolation of nucleic acids from virus like particles followed by direct cloning in surrogate host species | • Culture independent | • Potential bias in inventory gained as focuses on free viral particles (i.e., actively replicating phage) |
| • Can provide access to accessory genes and potential assessment of function/impact on host bacteria | • Laborious and expensive, with insights limited by scale of libraries that can be generated and screened | ||
| • Can provide community-level insights | • Biases due to difficulties in cloning phage DNA and maintaining in surrogate host may be apparent | ||
| • Use of single surrogate host may limit heterologous gene expression and therefore utility in functional evaluation of phage genes | |||
| • Loss of host range information | |||
| – Virus-like particle libraries | • Isolation of virus like particles from biological samples using centrifugation and/or filtration methods, extraction, and amplification of encapsulated DNA followed by high-throughput sequencing | • Culture independent | • Potential bias in inventory gained as focuses on free viral particles (i.e., actively replicating phage) |
| • In-depth inventory of composition and functional repertoire of viruses within biological samples | • Viral DNA recovered can be very low therefore amplification techniques used that may bias community snapshot gained | ||
| • Assessment of viral diversity and lifestyles within the human gut | • No host information | ||
| • Community-level assessment | • Large fraction of recovered sequences are ‘unknown’ | ||
| • Potential contamination of VLP libraries with bacterial DNA | |||
| • Relatively expensive for routine/repeated analyses | |||
| • Difficult to test hypotheses generated | |||
| • Loss of host range information | |||
| – Whole community shotgun sequencing | • Extraction of total DNA from a biological sample, followed by library preparation and high-throughput sequencing | • Viral DNA is significant fraction of extracted DNA | • Difficult to distinguish between bacterial and viral sequences |
| • Full microbial community snapshot gained | • Identification of host species remains challenging | ||
| • Community level inventory | • Potential bias in inventory gained as focuses on ‘quiescent’ fraction of virome | ||
| • Structural and functional information provided | • Relatively expensive for routine/repeated analyses | ||
| • Difficult to test hypotheses generated |