Literature DB >> 26440659

The significance of aortic valve calcification in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Xinshuang Ren1, Minghui Zhang2, Kun Liu1, Zhihui Hou1, Yang Gao1, Weihua Yin1, Zhiqiang Wang3, Zhennan Li1, Bin Lu4.   

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart disease. Our study was to analyze clinical features of BAV and evaluate whether aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) was a reliable marker for aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with BAV. 101 patients with BAV who both underwent echocardiology and cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan in our institution were included. Basic clinical data, haemodynamic feature, aortic valve and coronary calcium score were collected and compared among patients with different valve function and different degree of AS. Risk factors related to severe AS were evaluated by logistic regression, and a receiver operative characteristic curve was used to determine the cutoff calcium score greater than which the diagnosis of severe AS was optimized. Patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) were younger and demonstrated larger aortic annulus and sinus compared with patients with other valve dysfunction. Aortic valve calcium score was higher in patients with AS than with AR. For patients with different degree of AS, there were statistical significances in the value of age, aortic valve calcium score and coronary calcium score. AVCS was positively related to severe AS with an odd ratio of 1.286 (95% CI 1.099-1.504) by every 300 points increase. AVCS was also a strong predictor for severe AS with area under the curve 0.855 with a cutoff value of 897 (sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 72.2%). Conclusively, aortic calcium score calculated by quantitative CT is a reliable marker in evaluating severity of AS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve calcification; Bicuspid aortic valve

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26440659     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0783-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  20 in total

1.  Implications of bicuspid aortic valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Crochan J O'Sullivan; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  Characteristics of aortic valve dysfunction and ascending aorta dimensions according to bicuspid aortic valve morphology.

Authors:  Hong Ju Shin; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Kun Chee; Jun Suk Kim; Sung Min Ko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Samuel C Siu; Candice K Silversides
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Pathogenesis of aortic stenosis and its relation to age.

Authors:  A Pomerance
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1972-06

5.  Incidental aortic valve calcification on CT scans: significance for bicuspid and tricuspid valve disease.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Thomas H Urbania; John-Paul J Yu; Sam Chitsaz; Elaine Tseng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Progression of aortic dilation in children with a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Rebecca S Beroukhim; Tracy L Kruzick; Amy L Taylor; Dexiang Gao; Anji T Yetman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Prevalence and clinical importance of aortic valve calcification detected incidentally on CT scans: comparison with echocardiography.

Authors:  Ralf Koos; Harald Peter Kühl; Georg Mühlenbruch; Joachim Ernst Wildberger; Rolf W Günther; Andreas Horst Mahnken
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Ascending aortic dilatation is rarely associated with coronary artery disease regardless of aortic valve morphology.

Authors:  Veronica Jackson; Maria J Eriksson; Kenneth Caidahl; Per Eriksson; Anders Franco-Cereceda
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Aortic valve calcification as a marker for aortic stenosis severity: assessment on 16-MDCT.

Authors:  Ralf Koos; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Anil Martin Sinha; Joachim Ernst Wildberger; Rainer Hoffmann; Harald Peter Kühl
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Bicuspid aortic valve: unresolved issues and role of imaging specialists.

Authors:  Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-03-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  Aortic roots assessment by an automated three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: an intra-individual comparison.

Authors:  Minghui Zhang; Linyuan Wan; Kun Liu; Weichun Wu; Hui Li; Yuan Wang; Bin Lu; Hao Wang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Aortic Valve Calcium Score with Cardiac CT for Aortic Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tom Kai Ming Wang; Scott D Flamm; Paul Schoenhagen; Brian P Griffin; L Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard A Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 3.  Sudden cardiac death from structural heart diseases in adults: imaging findings with cardiovascular computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Song Soo Kim; Sung Min Ko; Sang Il Choi; Bo Hwa Choi; Arthur E Stillman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.