S Meckel1, C Taschner2, S ElSheikh2, C J Maurer2, H Urbach2. 1. Klinik für Neuroradiologie, Uniklinik Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 64, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. stephan.meckel@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Klinik für Neuroradiologie, Uniklinik Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 64, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the treatment of ischemic stroke. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis and comparison of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MT versus i.v. thrombolysis (IVT) considering pathophysiological and logistic aspects. RESULTS: The use of MT is more effective than IVT for internal carotid artery terminus (ICAT), M1 segment and tandem occlusions, i.e. proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion or stenosis, even in patients older than 75-80 years of age. Due to the small sample sizes this question cannot be answered for patients with M2 occlusions. It is still uncertain whether MT is needed in patients with a low National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score, whether IVT is needed before MT and what type of imaging should be performed. Approximately one third of eligible patients currently undergo MT in Germany. Results from RCTs with stent retrievers for patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusions are lacking. CONCLUSION: After becoming established as a first-line therapy for patients with ICAT, M1 segment and tandem occlusions, the effectiveness of MT with stent retrievers has to proven in patients with more distal occlusions, low NIHSS scores and even vertebrobasilar artery occlusions.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the treatment of ischemic stroke. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis and comparison of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MT versus i.v. thrombolysis (IVT) considering pathophysiological and logistic aspects. RESULTS: The use of MT is more effective than IVT for internal carotid artery terminus (ICAT), M1 segment and tandem occlusions, i.e. proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion or stenosis, even in patients older than 75-80 years of age. Due to the small sample sizes this question cannot be answered for patients with M2 occlusions. It is still uncertain whether MT is needed in patients with a low National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score, whether IVT is needed before MT and what type of imaging should be performed. Approximately one third of eligible patients currently undergo MT in Germany. Results from RCTs with stent retrievers for patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusions are lacking. CONCLUSION: After becoming established as a first-line therapy for patients with ICAT, M1 segment and tandem occlusions, the effectiveness of MT with stent retrievers has to proven in patients with more distal occlusions, low NIHSS scores and even vertebrobasilar artery occlusions.
Authors: Bijoy K Menon; Christopher D d'Esterre; Emmad M Qazi; Mohammed Almekhlafi; Leszek Hahn; Andrew M Demchuk; Mayank Goyal Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lucie A van den Berg; Diederik L H Koelman; Olvert A Berkhemer; Anouk D Rozeman; Puck S S Fransen; Debbie Beumer; Diederik W Dippel; Aad van der Lugt; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Wim H van Zwam; Patrick A Brouwer; Sjoerd Jenniskens; Jelis Boiten; Geert A Lycklama À Nijeholt; Jan Albert Vos; Wouter J Schonewille; Charles B L M Majoie; Yvo B W E M Roos Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wouter J Schonewille; Christine A C Wijman; Patrik Michel; Christina M Rueckert; Christian Weimar; Heinrich P Mattle; Stefan T Engelter; David Tanne; Keith W Muir; Carlos A Molina; Vincent Thijs; Heinrich Audebert; Thomas Pfefferkorn; Kristina Szabo; Perttu J Lindsberg; Gabriel de Freitas; L Jaap Kappelle; Ale Algra Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: W Hacke; M Kaste; C Fieschi; R von Kummer; A Davalos; D Meier; V Larrue; E Bluhmki; S Davis; G Donnan; D Schneider; E Diez-Tejedor; P Trouillas Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-10-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Chelsea S Kidwell; Reza Jahan; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jeffry R Alger; Val Nenov; Zahra Ajani; Lei Feng; Brett C Meyer; Scott Olson; Lee H Schwamm; Albert J Yoo; Randolph S Marshall; Philip M Meyers; Dileep R Yavagal; Max Wintermark; Judy Guzy; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Urbach; A Hartmann; C Pohl; H Omran; K Wilhelm; S Flacke; H H Schild; T Klockgether Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2002-06-29 Impact factor: 2.804