Literature DB >> 26440023

Effects of chitosan on nutrient digestibility, methane emissions, and in vitro fermentation in beef cattle.

D D Henry, M Ruiz-Moreno, F M Ciriaco, M Kohmann, V R G Mercadante, G C Lamb, N DiLorenzo.   

Abstract

Chitosan was evaluated as a feed additive to mitigate in vivo CH4 emissions in beef cattle. Twenty-four crossbred heifers (BW = 318 ± 35 kg) were used in a randomized block design replicated in 2 periods. The design included a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments, which included diet (high concentrate [HC] or low concentrate [LC]) and 0.0, 0.5, or 1.0% of chitosan inclusion (DM basis). Diets were offered ad libitum and individual intake was recorded. An in vitro experiment to analyze chitosan’s effect on fermentation parameters and gas production kinetics was performed. A diet effect (P < 0.01) was observed for CH4 emissions expressed as grams/day, grams/kilogram of BW0.75, and grams/kilogram of DMI. Heifers consuming the LC diet produced 130 g of CH4/d vs. 45 g of CH4/d in those consuming the HC diet. Incubation fluid pH increased linearly (P < 0.05) when chitosan was included in HC substrates. In vitro CH4 production was not affected (P > 0.10) by chitosan in HC substrate; however, when incubated with the LC substrate, CH4 production increased quadratically (P < 0.01) as chitosan inclusion increased. A digestibility marker × diet interaction occurred (P < 0.05) for DM, OM, CP, NDF, and ADF digestibility. Diet × chitosan interactions (P < 0.05) occurred for DM, OM, NDF, and ADF digestibility when Cr2O3 was used. When TiO2 was used, diet × chitosan interactions (P < 0.05) were observed for NDF and ADF. However, using indigestible NDF as an internal marker, DM and OM digestibility were improved (P < 0.05) by 21 and 19%, respectively, when chitosan was included in LC diets. In conclusion, feeding up to 1% of chitosan (DM basis) to heifers consuming a LC diet increased apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients. Enteric CH4 emissions were not affected by chitosan feeding, regardless of type of diet, and heifers consuming a 36% concentrate diet produced 2.6 times more methane per day than those consuming an 85% concentrate diet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26440023     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium ammonium nitrate on ruminal fermentation of beef cattle.

Authors:  Darren D Henry; Francine M Ciriaco; Rafael C Araujo; Pedro L P Fontes; Nicola Oosthuizen; Sebastian E Mejia-Turcios; Mariana E Garcia-Ascolani; Lautaro Rostoll-Cangiano; Tessa M Schulmeister; Jose C B Dubeux; G Cliff Lamb; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of bismuth subsalicylate and encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate on feedlot beef cattle production.

Authors:  Sebastian E Mejia-Turcios; Andrea M Osorio-Doblado; Francine M Ciriaco; Phil M Urso; Rafael C Araujo; Dale R Woerner; Bradley J Johnson; Jose C B Dubeux; Jhones O Sarturi; Nicolas DiLorenzo; Darren D Henry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  The impact of maturity stages on yield, quality, and nutritive value of ensiled Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers].

Authors:  Camila S da Silva; Jennifer J Tucker; Fabio J Maia; Jeferson M Lourenço; Morgan L Bass; Darren S Seidel; Todd R Callaway; Dennis W Hancock; R Lawton Stewart
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-26

4.  Effect of chemical and biological preservatives and ensiling stage on the dry matter loss, nutritional value, microbial counts, and ruminal in vitro gas production kinetics of wet brewer's grain silage.

Authors:  Marjorie A Killerby; Saulo T R Almeida; Rachel Hollandsworth; Bianca C Guimaraes; Angela Leon-Tinoco; Lewis B Perkins; Darren Henry; Thomas J Schwartz; Juan J Romero
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Triterpenes from Olea europaea modulate in vitro ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  Lautaro R Cangiano; Darren D Henry; Francine M Ciriaco; Jose Carlos Quintela; Nicolas DiLorenzo; Ignacio R Ipharraguerre
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-06

6.  Evaluating the potential of lignosulfonates and chitosans as alfalfa hay preservatives using in vitro techniques.

Authors:  Angela Y Leon-Tinoco; Seanna L Annis; Saulo T Almeida; Bianca C Guimarães; Marjorie Killerby; Jinglin Zhang; Changqing Wu; Lewis B Perkins; Zhengxin Ma; Kwangcheol C Jeong; Juan J Romero
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

7.  Effect of Chitosan and Naringin on Enteric Methane Emissions in Crossbred Heifers Fed Tropical Grass.

Authors:  Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo; María Denisse Montoya-Flores; Esperanza Herrera-Torres; Gerardo Pámanes-Carrasco; Jeyder Israel Arceo-Castillo; Sara Stephanie Valencia-Salazar; Jacobo Arango; Carlos Fernando Aguilar-Pérez; Luis Ramírez-Avilés; Francisco Javier Solorio-Sánchez; Ángel Trinidad Piñeiro-Vázquez; Juan Carlos Ku-Vera
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Hydrothermally Treated Chitosan Hydrogel Loaded with Copper and Zinc Particles as a Potential Micronutrient-Based Antimicrobial Feed Additive.

Authors:  Parthiban Rajasekaran; Swadeshmukul Santra
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-11-23

9.  Comparison of the ruminal and fecal microbiotas in beef calves supplemented or not with concentrate.

Authors:  Jeferson M Lourenco; Troy J Kieran; Darren S Seidel; Travis C Glenn; Magali F da Silveira; Todd R Callaway; R Lawton Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Role of Chitosan as a Possible Agent for Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants.

Authors:  Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo; Sara Valencia-Salazar; Carmen Elisa Pinzón-Díaz; Esperanza Herrera-Torres; Carlos Fernando Aguilar-Pérez; Jacobo Arango; Juan Carlos Ku-Vera
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.