Literature DB >> 35350073

Effect of chemical and biological preservatives and ensiling stage on the dry matter loss, nutritional value, microbial counts, and ruminal in vitro gas production kinetics of wet brewer's grain silage.

Marjorie A Killerby1, Saulo T R Almeida2, Rachel Hollandsworth1, Bianca C Guimaraes2, Angela Leon-Tinoco1, Lewis B Perkins3, Darren Henry4, Thomas J Schwartz5, Juan J Romero1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of chemical and biological preservatives and ensiling stage on spoilage, ruminal in vitro fermentation, and methane production of wet brewer's grain (WBG) silage. Treatments (TRT) were sodium lignosulfonate at 10 g/kg fresh WBG (NaL1) and 20 g/kg (NaL2), propionic acid at 5 g/kg fresh WBG (PRP, 99%), a combination inoculant (INO; Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus buchneri each at 4.9 log cfu per fresh WBG g), and untreated WBG (CON). Fresh WBG was treated and then ensiled for 60 d, after which mini silos were opened and aerobically exposed (AES) for 10 d. Data were analyzed as an RCBD (five blocks) with a 5 TRT × 3 stages (STG; fresh, ensiled, and AES) factorial arrangement. Results showed that ensiled PRP-treated WBG markedly preserved more water-soluble carbohydrates and starch than all other ensiled TRT (P < 0.001). Dry matter losses of ensiled PRP-treated WBG were 48% lower than all other ensiled TRT (P = 0.009) but were not different than CON in AES (P = 0.350). Due to its greater concentration of digestible nutrients, PRP-treated AES was less aerobically stable than CON (P = 0.03). Preservation was not improved by INO, NaL1, or NaL2 but the latter prevented the increase of neutral detergent fiber across STG (P = 0.392). Apparent in vitro DM digestibility (IVDMD) decreased only in ensiled CON, INO, and NaL1 relative to fresh WBG and AES NaL2 had greater IVDMD than all other AES TRT (P ≤ 0.032). In vitro ruminal fermentation of fresh WBG resulted in a greater methane concentration and yield than the other STG (P < 0.033). In conclusion, PRP was the most effective at preserving WBG during ensiling but failed to improve aerobic stability under the conditions tested.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerobic stability; preservatives; silage; wet brewer’s grain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35350073      PMCID: PMC9109006          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  33 in total

Review 1.  Brewing by-products: their use as animal feeds.

Authors:  Michael L Westendorf; James E Wohlt
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva.

Authors:  E I McDougall
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1948       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  A novel fungal killing mechanism of propionic acid.

Authors:  JiEun Yun; Dong Gun Lee
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Effects of rumen-degradable protein:rumen-undegradable protein ratio and corn processing on production performance, nitrogen efficiency, and feeding behavior of Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  M Savari; M Khorvash; H Amanlou; G R Ghorbani; E Ghasemi; M Mirzaei
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Storage characteristics, nutritive value, energy content, and in vivo digestibility of moist, large rectangular bales of alfalfa-orchardgrass hay treated with a propionic acid-based preservative.

Authors:  W K Coblentz; K P Coffey; A N Young; M G Bertram
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  Production and Application of Lignosulfonates and Sulfonated Lignin.

Authors:  Thomas Aro; Pedram Fatehi
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 8.928

8.  Effects of Tween 60 and Tween 80 on protease activity, thiol group reactivity, protein adsorption, and cellulose degradation by rumen microbial enzymes.

Authors:  G M Kamande; J Baah; K J Cheng; T A McAllister; J A Shelford
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with Lactobacillus buchneri, with or without other bacteria, on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and performance of dairy cows.

Authors:  Kathy G Arriola; André S Oliveira; Yun Jiang; Donghyeon Kim; Henrique M Silva; Sam Churl Kim; Felipe X Amaro; Ibukun M Ogunade; Halima Sultana; Andres A Pech Cervantes; Luiz F Ferraretto; Diwakar Vyas; Adegbola T Adesogan
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 10.  Challenges with nonfiber carbohydrate methods.

Authors:  M B Hall
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.