Literature DB >> 26439593

A new test and graphical tool to assess the goodness of fit of logistic regression models.

Giovanni Nattino1, Stefano Finazzi2, Guido Bertolini1.   

Abstract

A prognostic model is well calibrated when it accurately predicts event rates. This is first determined by testing for goodness of fit with the development dataset. All existing tests and graphic tools designed for the purpose suffer several drawbacks, related mainly to the subgrouping of observations or to heavy dependence on arbitrary parameters. We propose a statistical test and a graphical method to assess the goodness of fit of logistic regression models, obtained through an extension of similar techniques developed for external validation. We analytically computed and numerically verified the distribution of the underlying statistic. Simulations on a set of realistic scenarios show that this test and the well-known Hosmer-Lemeshow approach have similar type I error rates. The main advantage of this new approach is that the relationship between model predictions and outcome rates across the range of probabilities can be represented in the calibration belt plot, together with its statistical confidence. By readily spotting any deviations from the perfect fit, this new graphical tool is designed to identify, during the process of model development, poorly modeled variables that call for further investigation. This is illustrated through an example based on real data.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  calibration test; dichotomous outcome models; goodness of fit; graphical methods; logistic regression models

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26439593     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

1.  Intensive care medicine in 2050: statistical tools for development of prognostic models (why clinicians should not be ignored).

Authors:  Daniele Poole; Greta Carrara; Guido Bertolini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Prediction of Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Erik Bülow; Ute Hahn; Ina Trolle Andersen; Ola Rolfson; Alma B Pedersen; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index to Predict Surgical Site Infection Among Gynecologic Oncology Patients.

Authors:  Zhihui Chen; Mingchen Zhong; Ziqin Xu; Qing Ye; Wenwen Xie; Shengchun Gao; Le Chen; Lidan Qiu; Jiaru Jiang; Hongmei Wu; Xiuyang Li; Haihong Wang
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Mortality attributable to different Klebsiella susceptibility patterns and to the coverage of empirical antibiotic therapy: a cohort study on patients admitted to the ICU with infection.

Authors:  Guido Bertolini; Giovanni Nattino; Carlo Tascini; Daniele Poole; Bruno Viaggi; Greta Carrara; Carlotta Rossi; Daniele Crespi; Matteo Mondini; Martin Langer; Gian Maria Rossolini; Paolo Malacarne
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Inguinal hernia repair among men: development and validation of a preoperative risk score for persistent postoperative pain.

Authors:  M V Vad; S W Svendsen; P Frost; G Nattino; J Rosenberg; S Lemeshow
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.920

6.  Reconsidering lactate as a sepsis risk biomarker.

Authors:  John L Moran; John Santamaria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Are high nurse workload/staffing ratios associated with decreased survival in critically ill patients? A cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Lee; Yip Sing Leo Cheung; Gavin Matthew Joynt; Czarina Chi Hung Leung; Wai-Tat Wong; Charles David Gomersall
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.925

8.  Development and validation of a risk-prediction nomogram for patients with ureteral calculi associated with urosepsis: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ming Hu; Xintai Zhong; Xuejiang Cui; Xun Xu; Zhanying Zhang; Lixian Guan; Quanyao Feng; Yiheng Huang; Weilie Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Common intensive care scoring systems do not outperform age and glasgow coma scale score in predicting mid-term mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage treated in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Marika Fallenius; Markus B Skrifvars; Matti Reinikainen; Stepani Bendel; Rahul Raj
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Validation of the ICH score in patients with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage admitted to the intensive care unit in Southern Spain.

Authors:  Sonia Rodríguez-Fernández; Encarnación Castillo-Lorente; Francisco Guerrero-Lopez; David Rodríguez-Rubio; Eduardo Aguilar-Alonso; Jesús Lafuente-Baraza; Francisco Javier Gómez-Jiménez; Juan Mora-Ordóñez; Ricardo Rivera-López; María Dolores Arias-Verdú; Guillermo Quesada-García; Miguel Ángel Arráez-Sánchez; Ricardo Rivera-Fernández
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.