Literature DB >> 26439355

Morphological Phylogenetics in the Genomic Age.

Michael S Y Lee1, Alessandro Palci2.   

Abstract

Evolutionary trees underpin virtually all of biology, and the wealth of new genomic data has enabled us to reconstruct them with increasing detail and confidence. While phenotypic (typically morphological) traits are becoming less important in reconstructing evolutionary trees, they still serve vital and unique roles in phylogenetics, even for living taxa for which vast amounts of genetic information are available. Morphology remains a powerful independent source of evidence for testing molecular clades, and - through fossil phenotypes - the primary means for time-scaling phylogenies. Morphological phylogenetics is therefore vital for transforming undated molecular topologies into dated evolutionary trees. However, if morphology is to be employed to its full potential, biologists need to start scrutinising phenotypes in a more objective fashion, models of phenotypic evolution need to be improved, and approaches for analysing phenotypic traits and fossils together with genomic data need to be refined.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26439355     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  27 in total

1.  A Simulation-Based Evaluation of Tip-Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.

Authors:  Arong Luo; David A Duchêne; Chi Zhang; Chao-Dong Zhu; Simon Y W Ho
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Morphological Phylogenetics Evaluated Using Novel Evolutionary Simulations.

Authors:  Joseph N Keating; Robert S Sansom; Mark D Sutton; Christopher G Knight; Russell J Garwood
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Combined-evidence analyses of ultraconserved elements and morphological data: an empirical example in iguanian lizards.

Authors:  Simon G Scarpetta
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Tip-dating and homoplasy: reconciling the shallow molecular divergences of modern gharials with their long fossil record.

Authors:  Michael S Y Lee; Adam M Yates
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The impact of molecular data on the phylogenetic position of the putative oldest crown crocodilian and the age of the clade.

Authors:  Gustavo Darlim; Michael S Y Lee; Jules Walter; Márton Rabi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Phylogenetic Signal and Bias in Paleontology.

Authors:  Robert J Asher; Martin R Smith
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.160

7.  Whole-Genome Phylogenetic Reconstruction as a Powerful Tool to Reveal Homoplasy and Ancient Rapid Radiation in Waterflea Evolution.

Authors:  Kay Van Damme; Luca Cornetti; Peter D Fields; Dieter Ebert
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.160

8.  Detecting Phylogenetic Signal and Adaptation in Papionin Cranial Shape by Decomposing Variation at Different Spatial Scales.

Authors:  Nicole D S Grunstra; Silvester J Bartsch; Anne Le Maître; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.

Authors:  Joseph E O'Reilly; Mark N Puttick; Luke Parry; Alastair R Tanner; James E Tarver; James Fleming; Davide Pisani; Philip C J Donoghue
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  A mixed relaxed clock model.

Authors:  Nicolas Lartillot; Matthew J Phillips; Fredrik Ronquist
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.