Literature DB >> 26438786

A Conserved Core of Programmed Cell Death Indicator Genes Discriminates Developmentally and Environmentally Induced Programmed Cell Death in Plants.

Yadira Olvera-Carrillo1, Michiel Van Bel1, Tom Van Hautegem1, Matyáš Fendrych1, Marlies Huysmans1, Maria Simaskova1, Matthias van Durme1, Pierre Buscaill1, Susana Rivas1, Nuria S. Coll1, Frederik Coppens1, Steven Maere1, Moritz K. Nowack2.   

Abstract

A plethora of diverse programmed cell death (PCD) processes has been described in living organisms. In animals and plants, different forms of PCD play crucial roles in development, immunity, and responses to the environment. While the molecular control of some animal PCD forms such as apoptosis is known in great detail, we still know comparatively little about the regulation of the diverse types of plant PCD. In part, this deficiency in molecular understanding is caused by the lack of reliable reporters to detect PCD processes. Here, we addressed this issue by using a combination of bioinformatics approaches to identify commonly regulated genes during diverse plant PCD processes in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Our results indicate that the transcriptional signatures of developmentally controlled cell death are largely distinct from the ones associated with environmentally induced cell death. Moreover, different cases of developmental PCD share a set of cell death-associated genes. Most of these genes are evolutionary conserved within the green plant lineage, arguing for an evolutionary conserved core machinery of developmental PCD. Based on this information, we established an array of specific promoter-reporter lines for developmental PCD in Arabidopsis. These PCD indicators represent a powerful resource that can be used in addition to established morphological and biochemical methods to detect and analyze PCD processes in vivo and in planta.
© 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26438786      PMCID: PMC4677882          DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  60 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial programmed cell death: making sense of a paradox.

Authors:  Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Genetic analysis of seed coat development in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  George Haughn; Abed Chaudhury
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 3.  Morphological classification of plant cell deaths.

Authors:  W G van Doorn; E P Beers; J L Dangl; V E Franklin-Tong; P Gallois; I Hara-Nishimura; A M Jones; M Kawai-Yamada; E Lam; J Mundy; L A J Mur; M Petersen; A Smertenko; M Taliansky; F Van Breusegem; T Wolpert; E Woltering; B Zhivotovsky; P V Bozhkov
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 4.  Gibberellin control of stamen development: a fertile field.

Authors:  Andrew R G Plackett; Stephen G Thomas; Zoe A Wilson; Peter Hedden
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  The INTACT method for cell type-specific gene expression and chromatin profiling in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Roger B Deal; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  Classes of programmed cell death in plants, compared to those in animals.

Authors:  Wouter G van Doorn
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Mitochondrial proteome during salt stress-induced programmed cell death in rice.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Ying Wang; Jianyou Li; Ailiang Jiang; Yanwei Cheng; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.270

8.  Ribonucleotide reductase regulation in response to genotoxic stress in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Hélène Roa; Julien Lang; Kevin M Culligan; Murielle Keller; Sarah Holec; Valérie Cognat; Marie-Hélène Montané; Guy Houlné; Marie-Edith Chabouté
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Genome-scale Arabidopsis promoter array identifies targets of the histone acetyltransferase GCN5.

Authors:  Moussa Benhamed; Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette; Ludivine Taconnat; Frédérique Bitton; Caroline Servet; Rebecca De Clercq; Björn De Meyer; Caroline Buysschaert; Stéphane Rombauts; Raimundo Villarroel; Sébastien Aubourg; Jim Beynon; Rishikesh P Bhalerao; George Coupland; Wilhelm Gruissem; Frank L H Menke; Bernd Weisshaar; Jean-Pierre Renou; Dao-Xiu Zhou; Pierre Hilson
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 10.  UV-Induced cell death in plants.

Authors:  Ganesh M Nawkar; Punyakishore Maibam; Jung Hoon Park; Vaidurya Pratap Sahi; Sang Yeol Lee; Chang Ho Kang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  42 in total

1.  A View to a Kill: Markers for Developmentally Regulated Cell Death in Plants.

Authors:  Alexis Maizel
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Local brassinosteroid biosynthesis enables optimal root growth.

Authors:  Nemanja Vukašinović; Yaowei Wang; Isabelle Vanhoutte; Matyáš Fendrych; Boyu Guo; Miroslav Kvasnica; Petra Jiroutová; Jana Oklestkova; Miroslav Strnad; Eugenia Russinova
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 3.  Metacaspases versus caspases in development and cell fate regulation.

Authors:  E A Minina; N S Coll; H Tuominen; P V Bozhkov
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 15.828

4.  Cellular oxidative stress in programmed cell death: focusing on chloroplastic 1O2 and mitochondrial cytochrome-c release.

Authors:  Angel J Matilla
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  NAC Transcription Factors ANAC087 and ANAC046 Control Distinct Aspects of Programmed Cell Death in the Arabidopsis Columella and Lateral Root Cap.

Authors:  Marlies Huysmans; Rafael Andrade Buono; Noemi Skorzinski; Marta Cubria Radio; Freya De Winter; Boris Parizot; Jan Mertens; Mansour Karimi; Matyas Fendrych; Moritz K Nowack
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Expression analysis of KDEL-CysEPs programmed cell death markers during reproduction in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Liang-Zi Zhou; Timo Höwing; Benedikt Müller; Ulrich Z Hammes; Christine Gietl; Thomas Dresselhaus
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.767

Review 7.  Evolution and palaeophysiology of the vascular system and other means of long-distance transport.

Authors:  John A Raven
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Similarities between Reproductive and Immune Pistil Transcriptomes of Arabidopsis Species.

Authors:  Mariana Mondragón-Palomino; Ajay John-Arputharaj; Maria Pallmann; Thomas Dresselhaus
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  MONENSIN SENSITIVITY1 (MON1)/CALCIUM CAFFEINE ZINC SENSITIVITY1 (CCZ1)-Mediated Rab7 Activation Regulates Tapetal Programmed Cell Death and Pollen Development.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Qiong Zhao; Hong-Tao Xie; Wing Shing Wong; Xiangfeng Wang; Caiji Gao; Yu Ding; Yuqi Tan; Takashi Ueda; Yan Zhang; Liwen Jiang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  KIRA1 and ORESARA1 terminate flower receptivity by promoting cell death in the stigma of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Zhen Gao; Anna Daneva; Yuliya Salanenka; Matthias Van Durme; Marlies Huysmans; Zongcheng Lin; Freya De Winter; Steffen Vanneste; Mansour Karimi; Jan Van de Velde; Klaas Vandepoele; Davy Van de Walle; Koen Dewettinck; Bart N Lambrecht; Moritz K Nowack
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 15.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.