BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quetiapine has a range of clinical activity distinct from other atypical antipsychotic drugs, demonstrating efficacy as monotherapy in bipolar depression, major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. The neuropharmacological mechanisms underlying this clinical profile are not completely understood; however, the major active metabolite, norquetiapine, has been shown to have a distinct in vitro pharmacological profile consistent with a broad therapeutic range and may contribute to the clinical profile of quetiapine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We evaluated quetiapine and norquetiapine, using in vitro binding and functional assays of targets known to be associated with antidepressant and anxiolytic drug actions and compared these activities with a representative range of established antipsychotics and antidepressants. To determine how the in vitro pharmacological properties translate into in vivo activity, we used preclinical animal models with translational relevance to established antidepressant-like and anxiolytic-like drug action. KEY RESULTS: Norquetiapine had equivalent activity to established antidepressants at the noradrenaline transporter (NET), while quetiapine was inactive. Norquetiapine was active in the mouse forced swimming and rat learned helplessness tests. In in vivo receptor occupancy studies, norquetiapine had significant occupancy at NET at behaviourally relevant doses. Both quetiapine and norquetiapine were agonists at 5-HT1A receptors, and the anxiolytic-like activity of norquetiapine in rat punished responding was blocked by the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY100635. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Quetiapine and norquetiapine have multiple in vitro pharmacological actions, and results from preclinical studies suggest that activity at NET and 5-HT1A receptors contributes to the antidepressant and anxiolytic effects in patients treated with quetiapine.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Quetiapine has a range of clinical activity distinct from other atypical antipsychotic drugs, demonstrating efficacy as monotherapy in bipolar depression, major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. The neuropharmacological mechanisms underlying this clinical profile are not completely understood; however, the major active metabolite, norquetiapine, has been shown to have a distinct in vitro pharmacological profile consistent with a broad therapeutic range and may contribute to the clinical profile of quetiapine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We evaluated quetiapine and norquetiapine, using in vitro binding and functional assays of targets known to be associated with antidepressant and anxiolytic drug actions and compared these activities with a representative range of established antipsychotics and antidepressants. To determine how the in vitro pharmacological properties translate into in vivo activity, we used preclinical animal models with translational relevance to established antidepressant-like and anxiolytic-like drug action. KEY RESULTS:Norquetiapine had equivalent activity to established antidepressants at the noradrenaline transporter (NET), while quetiapine was inactive. Norquetiapine was active in the mouse forced swimming and rat learned helplessness tests. In in vivo receptor occupancy studies, norquetiapine had significant occupancy at NET at behaviourally relevant doses. Both quetiapine and norquetiapine were agonists at 5-HT1A receptors, and the anxiolytic-like activity of norquetiapine in rat punished responding was blocked by the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY100635. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Quetiapine and norquetiapine have multiple in vitro pharmacological actions, and results from preclinical studies suggest that activity at NET and 5-HT1A receptors contributes to the antidepressant and anxiolytic effects in patients treated with quetiapine.
Authors: T J Hudzik; C Maciag; M A Smith; R Caccese; M R Pietras; K H Bui; M Coupal; L Adam; K Payza; A Griffin; G Smagin; D Song; M D B Swedberg; W Brown Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Michael Bauer; Herman W Pretorius; Eric L Constant; Willie R Earley; Johan Szamosi; Martin Brecher Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Borwin Bandelow; Guy Chouinard; Julio Bobes; Antti Ahokas; Ivan Eggens; Sherry Liu; Hans Eriksson Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Zuleide M Ignácio; Gislaine Z Réus; Helena M Abelaira; Airam B de Moura; Thays G de Souza; Danyela Matos; Mariana P Goldim; Khiany Mathias; Leandro Garbossa; Fabricia Petronilho; João Quevedo Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2017-05-06 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: G M Goodwin; P M Haddad; I N Ferrier; J K Aronson; Trh Barnes; A Cipriani; D R Coghill; S Fazel; J R Geddes; H Grunze; E A Holmes; O Howes; S Hudson; N Hunt; I Jones; I C Macmillan; H McAllister-Williams; D R Miklowitz; R Morriss; M Munafò; C Paton; B J Saharkian; Kea Saunders; Jma Sinclair; D Taylor; E Vieta; A H Young Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 4.153