Literature DB >> 26436587

On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.

N Van der Stoep1, C Spence2, T C W Nijboer3, S Van der Stigchel4.   

Abstract

Two processes that can give rise to multisensory response enhancement (MRE) are multisensory integration (MSI) and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention. It is, however, currently unclear what the relative contribution of each of these is to MRE. We investigated this issue using two tasks that are generally assumed to measure MSI (a redundant target effect task) and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention (a spatial cueing task). One block of trials consisted of unimodal auditory and visual targets designed to provide a unimodal baseline. In two other blocks of trials, the participants were presented with spatially and temporally aligned and misaligned audiovisual (AV) targets (0, 50, 100, and 200ms SOA). In the integration block, the participants were instructed to respond to the onset of the first target stimulus that they detected (A or V). The instruction for the cueing block was to respond only to the onset of the visual targets. The targets could appear at one of three locations: left, center, and right. The participants were instructed to respond only to lateral targets. The results indicated that MRE was caused by MSI at 0ms SOA. At 50ms SOA, both crossmodal exogenous spatial attention and MSI contributed to the observed MRE, whereas the MRE observed at the 100 and 200ms SOAs was attributable to crossmodal exogenous spatial attention, alerting, and temporal preparation. These results therefore suggest that there may be a temporal window in which both MSI and exogenous crossmodal spatial attention can contribute to multisensory response enhancement.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crossmodal; Cueing; Exogenous spatial attention; Multisensory integration; Multisensory response enhancement; Race model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26436587     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  9 in total

1.  Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius; Farid I Kandil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Deploying attention to the target location of a pointing action modulates audiovisual processes at nontarget locations.

Authors:  Tristan Loria; Kanji Tanaka; Katsumi Watanabe; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Audiovisual integration in depth: multisensory binding and gain as a function of distance.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Kahan Modi; Mark T Wallace; Nathan Van der Stoep
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Fear Spreading Across Senses: Visual Emotional Events Alter Cortical Responses to Touch, Audition, and Vision.

Authors:  Judith Domínguez-Borràs; Sebastian Walter Rieger; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua; Rémi Neveu; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Auditory spatial attention is encoded in a retinotopic reference frame across eye-movements.

Authors:  Martijn Jan Schut; Nathan Van der Stoep; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Motor congruency and multisensory integration jointly facilitate visual information processing before movement execution.

Authors:  J A Elshout; N Van der Stoep; T C W Nijboer; S Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The additive nature of the human multisensory evoked pupil response.

Authors:  Nathan Van der Stoep; M J Van der Smagt; C Notaro; Z Spock; M Naber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Mengying Yuan; Zhongyu Shi; Min Gao; Rongxia Ren; Ming Wei; Yulin Gao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  Crowdsourced Measurement of Reaction Times to Audiovisual Stimuli With Various Degrees of Asynchrony.

Authors:  Pavlo Bazilinskyy; Joost de Winter
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.888

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.