| Literature DB >> 26435525 |
Danny Ionescu1, Mina Bizic-Ionescu1, Arzhang Khalili2, Reza Malekmohammadi2, Mohammad Reza Morad3, Dirk de Beer2, Hans-Peter Grossart1,4.
Abstract
Downward fluxes of particulate organpan>ic matter (POM) are the major process for sequestering atmosphericEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26435525 PMCID: PMC4592964 DOI: 10.1038/srep14706
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematics of the first flow-through rolling tank designed (A) and a picture of the system during a running experiment (B). The system described here is 30 cm long and the diameter of the inner tube is 9 cm. The inlet and outlet ports are fitter with standard Garden-hose adaptors to allow for the continuous rotation of the device alongside a continuous flow of water. This design consists of a transparent end-sealed inner cylinder (1) in which the particles are placed or allowed to form. A similar outer cylinder (2) encases the inner one, both fit hermetically into the side lids (3a, 3b), which are held fixed together by long fitting screws (4). Water flows into and out of the inner cylinder through two parallel channels 90° apart in clockwise direction (5a, 5b), each with 6 holes. The inlet and outlet holes (6a, 6b) are located on the first and second half of the inner cylinder, respectively. The entrance and exit of water (7a, 7b) lies at the center of the side lids, respectively. From there, water is led into and out of the corresponding inlet and outlet channels via inner tubes (8a, 8b). By connecting the entrance and exit of water with standard garden-hose swivel tube-connectors (9a, 9b), the entire system can rotate independently of the external pipes. A bubble-venting port (10) is also mounted on one of the side lids. Detailed images of the individual parts and their dimensions are given in Fig. S1 and Table S1, respectively.
Figure 2Schematics of the second flow-through rolling tank designed (A) and a picture showing the mounted motor and rotating belt (B). The system described here is 30 cm long and the diameter of the inner tube is 9 cm. This design consists of a single cylinder (1) with 20 peripheral holes (2a–b) at each side through which water flows into and out of the cylinder. The cylinder is end-sealed with removable caps (3a–b). A transparent rectangular container mounts the cylinder (4). Two cylindrical caps (5a–b) encapsulate the inlet and outlet holes and act as reservoirs for entering and exiting water (6a–b) into and out of the cylinder. Both caps and the rectangular mount are stationary while the cylinder is mounted with rotary seals (7a–d) and may rotate by drive-belt (8). Bubble venting valves (9a–b) are mounted on both fixed caps. Detailed images of the individual parts and their dimensions are given in Fig. S2 and Table S2, respectively.
Figure 3First row: 3D streamlines of massless particles released at (x, y, z) = (2 cm, 0, 13.5 cm) in the first flow-through design (3a), second flow-through design (3b) and closed system (3c). Second row: 3D pathlines of the a spherical particle with a density of ρ = 1005 kg m−3 8 released from the same position in the first design (3d), second design (3e) and the closed system (3f). The red circle denotes the initial position of the particle at t = 0 and its path after 1000 seconds.
Figure 4(A) We draw a red line on the left edge of the white band glued on the outer cylinder, highlighted by the black ellipse. From this fixed reference line, the horizontal displacement of each particle from its initial position can be traced versus time. (B) The experimentally captured relative displacements (W/Wmax)t of 15 randomly chosen particles from 30 subsequent images have been plotted versus their initial displacements (W7Wmax)0. All particles were found to move in the axial direction from their original positions only by less than 0.8% hinting toward a quasi-2D spiral motion. (C) Numerically obtained axial displacement the aggregate particles versus time. (D) The experimentally determined path of a randomly selected particle after 50 seconds. (E) The counterpart of image d as predicted by numerical simulation.
Figure 5Bacterial community composition at the class level of the in the flow-through and closed rolling tank system.
The community in the flow-through rolling tank was sampled at the outlet of the tank and is presented together with the community in-situ in the lake as well as at the inlet to the tank following the pumping of water. In addition to total community analysis (>0.2 μm), on the fourth day, the free-living (FL; >0.2 μm & <5 μm) and particle-associated (PA; >5 μm) communities were analyzed separately.
Figure 6Bacterial community composition at the family level as obtained from RNA sequences of pooled single macroscopic aggregates from flow-through rolling tanks sampled after 1, 7 and 8 days from inoculation.
Each sample is a result of 2 combined rolling tanks.
Figure 7Gross Photosynthesis as measured using the light/dark shift method in individual particles collected from the closed and flow-through rolling tanks (A). The Gross Photosynthesis rate was normalized to the Chl a index of each particle. The Chl a index is a comparable value between particles and was obtained by scanning individual particles with a hyperspectral camera connected to a light-microscope. The average Chl a indexes per sampling day are presented as well (B). Heterotrophic respiration (C) was calculated as the difference between the gross and the net photosynthesis rates for an integrated depth of 100 μm around the O2 peak in the particle.