Literature DB >> 26435242

The indirect cost of Patient-Specific Instruments.

Emmanuel Thienpont, Frederic Paternostre, Charles Van Wymeersch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To calculate the indirect costs of Patient Specific Instruments (PSI) based on an opportunity cost, cost of efforts and a supply chain cost model to compare PSI for value with conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: In 81 patients the total (direct+indirect) cost of PSI-assisted TKA was compared with conventional TKA. Surgical times and coronal mechanical alignment were measured to evaluate the effectiveness of the PSI system.
RESULTS: Indirect costs (459 euro) make up 40% of the total cost that can run up to 1142 euro for a patient operated with PSI guides. No difference in surgical times or coronal alignment was observed in between both groups.
CONCLUSION: Considering the total cost of PSI no value was found for the use of PSI in primary TKA as measured by surgical times or for obtaining a neutral mechanical axis in the coronal plane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26435242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  8 in total

1.  Process optimization in total knee arthoplasty procedures : Impact of size-specific instrument sets on costs and revenue.

Authors:  Maximilian C von Eiff; Wilfried von Eiff; Andreas Roth; Mohamed Ghanem
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Targeting repeatability of a less obtrusive surgical navigation procedure for total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Oded Aminov; William Regan; Joshua W Giles; Maciej J K Simon; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Comparative Cost Analysis of Four Different Computer-Assisted Technologies to Implant a Total Knee Arthroplasty over Conventional Instrumentation.

Authors:  Bernhard Christen; Lars Tanner; Max Ettinger; Michel P Bonnin; Peter P Koch; Tilman Calliess
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-30

4.  Patient-specific instruments: advantages and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Hafez; Kirti Moholkar
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 5.  Patient-Specific or Conventional Instrumentations: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yipeng Lin; Wufeng Cai; Baoyun Xu; Jian Li; Yuan Yang; Xuelin Pan; Weili Fu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A Coronal Landmark for Tibial Component Positioning With Anatomical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Radiological and Clinical Study.

Authors:  Tianlun Gong; Ruoyu Wang; Song Gong; Lizhi Han; Yihu Yi; Yuxiang Wang; Weihua Xu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 7.  Improving outcomes in total knee arthroplasty-do navigation or customized implants have a role?

Authors:  Matthew D Beal; Dimitri Delagramaticas; David Fitz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Patient-specific instrumentation improved three-dimensional accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative radiographic analysis of 1257 total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Leo Pauzenberger; Martin Munz; Georg Brandl; Julia K Frank; Philipp R Heuberer; Brenda Laky; Eva Schwameis; Werner Anderl
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.