| Literature DB >> 26433393 |
Alberto Corcoba1, Pascal Steullet1, João M N Duarte1, Yohan Van de Looij1, Aline Monin1, Michel Cuenod1, Rolf Gruetter1, Kim Q Do2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Structural anomalies of white matter are found in various brain regions of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar and other psychiatric disorders, but the causes at the cellular and molecular levels remain unclear. Oxidative stress and redox dysregulation have been proposed to play a role in the pathophysiology of several psychiatric conditions, but their anatomical and functional consequences are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate white matter throughout the brain in a preclinical model of redox dysregulation.Entities:
Keywords: Schizophrenia; anterior commissure; fimbria-fornix; glutathione; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26433393 PMCID: PMC4815475 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ISSN: 1461-1457 Impact factor: 5.176
Figure 1.Ventricular volume in Gclm KO and wild-type (WT) mice along development. Each box plot depicts group average (horizontal black lines), inter-quartile range (box), and 95% confidence interval (whiskers). *P<.05 significant effect of genotype, unpaired 2-tailed t test with Welch approximation to correct for heteroscedasticity.
Figure 2.Neurochemical alterations in the cortex of Gclm KO mice relative to controls (out of the whole neurochemical profile analyzed). Mean±SEM are shown. *P<.05, significant genotype effect. Top left panel shows the position of the voxel used for the acquisition.
Mean FA Values Per ROI and Genotype, Difference between Genotypes, and Standard Error of the Difference Estimated by a Mixed-Effects Linear Model Using Genotype and Age as Fixed Factors and Intercepts for Each Subject as Random Factor
| Region of interest | Mean WT | Mean KO | WT-KO (%) | WT-KO SD (%) | p | p corrected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fornix and Fimbria | 0.43 | 0.41 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 0.001 | *0.034 |
| Internal Capsule and Pallidum | 0.41 | 0.40 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.054 | 1 |
| Dorsal Hippocampal Commissure | 0.40 | 0.39 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.023 | 0.629 |
| Medulla and Pons | 0.38 | 0.36 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 0.08 | 1 |
| Corpus Callosum | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 0.641 | 1 |
| Anterior Commissure | 0.31 | 0.28 | 7.5 | 1.9 | 0 | *0.005 |
| Septum | 0.29 | 0.31 | -4.2 | 1.4 | 0.004 | 0.096 |
| Cingulum | 0.29 | 0.29 | -2.6 | 1.2 | 0.028 | 0.746 |
| Midbrain | 0.28 | 0.28 | -0.9 | 1.7 | 0.587 | 1 |
| External Capsule | 0.27 | 0.26 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.122 | 1 |
| Thalamus | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.496 | 1 |
| Basal Ganglia | 0.24 | 0.24 | -1.8 | 1.9 | 0.317 | 1 |
| Superior Colliculi | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 0.846 | 1 |
| Subiculum | 0.23 | 0.24 | -5.0 | 3.5 | 0.147 | 1 |
| Hypothalamus | 0.23 | 0.22 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 0.098 | 1 |
| Amygdala and Amygdaloid | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 0.766 | 1 |
| Olfactory Nucleus | 0.22 | 0.23 | -4.9 | 2.0 | 0.018 | 0.476 |
| Dorsal Raphe | 0.21 | 0.22 | -3.9 | 3.3 | 0.233 | 1 |
| Entorhinal, Piriform and Insular Cortex | 0.21 | 0.21 | -0.9 | 1.3 | 0.485 | 1 |
| Orbital Cortex | 0.20 | 0.21 | -3.8 | 1.5 | 0.011 | 0.308 |
| Periaqueductal Gray | 0.20 | 0.21 | -5.6 | 2.3 | 0.013 | 0.356 |
| Frontal Association and Motor Cortex | 0.18 | 0.18 | -1.8 | 1.2 | 0.127 | 1 |
| Caudate and Putamen | 0.17 | 0.18 | -2.4 | 1.5 | 0.098 | 1 |
| Prelimbic and Cingulate Cortex | 0.17 | 0.17 | -0.8 | 1.2 | 0.501 | 1 |
| Sensory and Visual Cortex | 0.16 | 0.17 | -4.5 | 2.0 | 0.03 | 0.806 |
| Dorsal Hippocampus | 0.16 | 0.16 | -0.4 | 2.0 | 0.847 | 1 |
| Ventral Hippocampus | 0.14 | 0.14 | -2.1 | 3.3 | 0.526 | 1 |
The first and second columns are calculated by averaging the values of the 3 ages for each animal and then the average of all animals of the respective genotype. The third column is calculated as (mean WT – mean KO) x 100/mean WT. The fourth column shows the SD of the difference (mean WT – mean KO) also in percentage of mean WT. P-values for genotype differences from the likelihood ratio tests before and after correction for multiple comparisons are given in the fifth and sixth columns, respectively.
Figure 3.Anomalies in diffusivity parameters derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in Gclm KO mice. Fractional anisotropy (FA) in the anterior commissure (AC) (A) and fimbria-fornix (FF) (B) and radial diffusivity (RD) in the AC (C) and FF (D) along the development of Gclm KO and wild-type (WT) mice. The graphs depict group average±SEM. *P<.05 for genotype effect corrected for multiple comparisons (see Methods). The right panel presents FA (E-F) and RD (G-H) images from a representative animal. Highlighted for spatial reference are the AC in blue (E,G) and the FF in yellow (F,H).
Figure 4.Conduction velocity along the fast- (A) and slow-conducting fibers (B) in the corpus callosum (CC), the fornix-fimbria (FF), and the anterior commissure (AC) of adult Gclm KO and wild-type (WT) mice. Mean±SEM are shown (n=8–11/group). *P<.05 unpaired 1-tailed t test. Traces (C-G) are representative recordings of compound action potentials (CAPs) evoked in each of these fiber tracts in Gclm KO and WT mice. Horizontal bars: 2ms; vertical bars: 1 mV; d is the measured distance between the stimulating and recording electrodes. pFF, posterior part of FF; aFF, anterior part of FF; aAC, anterior limb of AC; pAC posterior limb of AC.