Literature DB >> 26433364

Smoking, passive smoking and lung cancer cell types among women in Morocco: analysis of epidemiological profiling of 101 cases.

Fatima Az-zahra Zakkouri1,2, Ouaouch Saloua3, Abahssain Halima4, Razine Rachid5, Mrabti Hind6, Errihani Hassan7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently women's lung cancer mortality rates have dramatically increased in developed countries, contrasting with a levelling off or decrease among men. Descriptive epidemiological data on primary lung cancer in women is scarce in Morocco. The aim of this study, conducted in the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat, was to describe the epidemiological profiling especially for the smoking status, to determine the most frequent type of lung cancer, and to analyse the survival of Moroccan women with lung cancer diagnosis.
RESULTS: We found 101 women among 1680 (male and female) cases of lung cancer. The never-smokers were estimated to 75 %. The proportion of adenocarcinoma among never and passive smokers was higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (69.4 versus 30.6 %), while among women who were smokers, the most frequent histological type was SCC (63.6 %). The Cox regression analysis showed that smoking and passive smoking were not significantly associated with survival [HR: 0.62 (95 % CI 0.31, 1.30); p = 0.19] [HR: 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.08); p = 0.08] respectively. Adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with shorter survival [HR: 1.73 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.85); p = 0.03].
CONCLUSIONS: The majority Moroccan women affected by lung cancer have never smoked (75 %). Environmental exposures, genetic predisposition, hormonal factors, and viral infection may all play a role in lung cancer in this category. The relation between histological type and tobacco found in our series concurred with those reported in the literature--adenocarcinoma appears to be the most frequent cell type affecting never and passive smokers. Adenocarcinoma is significantly associated with poorer survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26433364      PMCID: PMC4592748          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1503-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Background

In the United States, lung cancer has been the leading cause of cancer deaths in both men and women. It’s surpassed both breast cancer and colon cancer [1]. Despite the progress made in the last years in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease, men and women die each year from lung cancer. In recent years, lung cancer mortality rates in women have dramatically increased in developed countries, contrasting with a levelling off or decrease among men [2]. In women, this dramatic increase can be explained by multiple factors. The primary cause remains tobacco, which has rapidly gained social acceptance among women after World War II [3]. In contrast, the decrease of cancer mortality in men is probably attributable to the decrease in smoking rates that began earlier in men than in women [3]. According to the Moroccan registry of cancer of Rabat of 2005, lung cancer is the leading cancer in men and comes at the eleventh place in women [4]. In Morocco, a study conducted by Lalla Salma’s foundation: “Prevention and Treatment of Cancer”, showed that over 15 years the prevalence of active smoking among elderly Moroccans was estimated at 18 %, 31.5 % of which were men and 3.3 % were women. Moreover, 41 % of the population was exposed to passive smoking [5]. Purely descriptive epidemiological data on primary lung cancer in women are scarce in Morocco. The aim of this study, conducted in the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat, was to describe the epidemiological profiling, in particular the smoking status, to determine the most frequent type of lung cancer, and to analyse the survival of Moroccan women with lung cancer diagnosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed enrolling 1680 cases of lung cancer, 101 (6 %) were women diagnosed between the period of January 2004 and December 2008 at the National Institute of Oncology. All these incident cases were within the respective time period. The study respected the ethical rules of medical research involving human subjects as stipulated by the World Medical Association in the Declaration of Helsinki. The local ethical committee of the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat also approved this study; with the consentment of patients or their families. The hospital charts, including medical history, were reviewed and the following information was collected: age at diagnosis, smoking status, histology, stage, presenting symptoms, investigations, treatment (surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or no treatment) and survival. All diagnosis were proved by anatomopathologic analysis of biopsy specimen. Non small cell lung cancer was divided into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma. The descriptive analysis was made by Statistical Package for the Social Science version 13.0 (SPSS). The progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the first documented disease progression or death from any cause. For PFS, Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed and compared by using a long-rank test. Descriptive statistics with 95 % of confidence interval were calculated according to standard procedure.

Results

We found 101 women among 1680 cases of lung cancer (versus 1579 men). The mean age was 55.68 years (standard deviation was 13.06). The percentage of never-smokers was 75 %, 14 % of patients had an environmental tobacco smoke exposure (the husband or another person in the family who smoke) and 11 % reported personal smoking (Table 1). The most frequent mode of presentation was chest pain (60 %), cough (54 %), dyspnea (38 %) and hemoptysis (27 %). Proportion of non small cell lung cancer at stage IV was higher (82 %), 16 % of cases were at stage III and only 2 % were classified as stage II (Table 1).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

CasesPercentage
Smoking status
 Never smokers7675
 Passive smokers1414
 Smokers1111
Symptoms
 Dyspnea3838
 Chest pain6160
 Cough5554
 Hemoptysis2727
 Intracranial hypertension76
 Vena cava syndrome11
 Phlebitis of upper limb11
Stage of non small cell lung cancer
 Stage IV8382
 Stage III1616
 Stage II22
 Stage I00
Lung cancer cell type
 Adenocarcinoma6059
 Squamous cell carcinoma3332
 Poorly differentiated carcinoma11
 Small cell lung cancer77
Treatment
 Palliative chemotherapy4343
 Chemoradiation77
 Radiotherapy88
 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before chemoradiation22
 Best supportive care3534
 Brain irradiation44
 Surgery and radiotherapy22
Patient characteristics The proportion of adenocarcinoma among never and passive smokers was higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma (69.4 versus 30.6 %), while among women who were smokers, the most frequent histological type was squamous cell carcinoma (63.6 %). The median follow-up was 2 months (1–24 months). The histological diagnosis was based on biopsy during bronchoscopy (80 %), as well as biopsy guided by CT scan (16 %) or thoracotomy (4 %). Palliative chemotherapy was planned in 43 % of cases, 7 % were treated by chemoradiation, 8 % by radiotherapy, 2 % received a neoadjuvant chemotherapy before chemoradiation and 2 % were treated by surgery and radiotherapy. The best supportive care were proposed in 34 % of cases and 4 % of patients received a whole brain irradiation (Table 1). For follow-up cases (88 %), the survival rates of cases with no small cell lung cancer at 6 months were at 27.7 %. Cases with squamous cell carcinoma had higher survival rates than the ones with adenocarcinoma (44.4 versus 25 %; p = 0.01), but we had no significant difference in progression free survival at 6 months between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (20 versus 25 %; p = 0.81) (Figs. 1, 2). In cases with small cell lung cancer, the survival rate at 6 months was 0 %. 13 cases were lost to follow-up.
Fig. 1

Time to death, survival curve in terms of histological type

Fig. 2

Time to progression, survival curve in terms of histological type

Time to death, survival curve in terms of histological type Time to progression, survival curve in terms of histological type The Cox regression analysis showed that smoking and passive smoking were not significantly associated with survival [HR: 0.62 (95 % CI 0.31, 1.30); p = 0.19] [HR: 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.08); p = 0.08] respectively. Adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with poorer survival [HR: 1.73 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.85); p = 0.03], brain metastasis was not significantly associated with survival [HR: 1.01 (95 % CI 0.53, 1.93); p = 0.97]. Subgroup analysis (85 patients who were never or passive smokers) showed that there was no significant difference in survival at 6 months between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (35 versus 20 %; p = 0.08) (Table 2).
Table 2

Subgroups analysis

AdenocarcinomaAssociated with survival[HR: 1.73 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.85); p = 0.03]
SmokingNot associated with survival[HR: 0.62 (95 % CI 0.31, 1.30); p = 0.19]
Passive smokingNot associated with survival[HR: 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.08); p = 0.08]
Brain metastasisNot associated with survival[HR: 1.01 (95 % CI 0.53, 1.93); p = 0.97]
Subgroups analysis 90.9 % (10 patients) of active smoking patients died, and one patient (accounting for 9.09 %) was lost to follow. 85 % (12 patients) of passive smoking patients died and 14.28 % (2 patients) were lost to follow.

Discussion

The mean age was 55.68 years (standard deviation was 13.06). Our patients developed the disease at an earlier age than other women in other studies [6, 7]. In our study, the percentage of never-smokers was 75 %. 14 % of patients had an environmental tobacco smoke exposure (the husband or another person in the family who smoke) and 11 % were reported personal smoking. In the majority of American and European reviews, most of the patients were current or ex-smokers [7-9]. Recently, approximately 23.1 % of men and 18.3 % of women in the United States have been cigarette smokers so far [10]. Tobacco does not explain all the women cases with lung cancer, because in this study, 75 % of patients were never smokers. Multiple factors such as environmental exposures, genetic mutations, hormonal factors, and some infections have also been implicated in the development of lung cancer in women who have never smoked [1]. A possible role of circulating steroid hormones particularly of oestrogens, in the etiology of lung cancer has been hypothesized [11]. It should be noted that oestrogen receptors have been detected on cancerous lung cells and estrogens induce the differentiation and maturation of the foetal lung [11-13]. Different studies have suggested that there is a potential protective effect of increased or prolonged estrogen exposure, others have found the opposite [14, 15]. Furthermore, a large meta-analysis reported a 24.5 % worldwide incidence of HPV in lung cancer, particularly in China [16] and recently, many Asian studies indicate that longer telomere length may increase lung cancer risk [17]. Studies evaluating gene environment interactions may provide important insights into carcinogenesis pathways of lung cancer in never smokers. In European and American series, most cases of non-small cell lung cancer were diagnosed at a relatively advanced stage according to the TNM classification system [6]. In our population, proportion of non small cell lung cancer at stage IV was higher (82 %), 16 % of cases were at stage III and only 2 % were at stage II. This high percentage can be explained by the delay of diagnosis. At the end of 1960s, changes in the frequency of different histological subtypes of lung cancer have been observed worldwide, with an increasing proportion of adenocarcinoma and a declining proportion of squamous cell carcinoma [18]. In our study, the proportion of adenocarcinoma among never and passive smokers was higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma (69.4 versus 30.6 %), while among women who were smokers, the most frequent histological type was squamous cell carcinoma (63.6 %). These results are almost similar to those reported in other studies. Adenocarcinoma represented 68.1 % in the Mayo Clinic’ study, 71 % in the Bennet’s series and 43.4 % in the Grivaux study [6, 9, 19]. Moreover, women’s 5-year relative survival rates have improved across nearly all stages with similar histologies, the benefit was more important in those with adenocarcinoma [20, 21]. In this study, adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with poorer survival [HR: 1.73 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.85); p = 0.03], while in a Radzikowska study published in Annals of Oncology 2002, the squamous cell carcinoma was a negative predictor of survival in univariate analysis (p = 0.008), but this result was no significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.29) [7]. Lung cancer survival rates for non smokers have improved compared with those of smokers [22]. In this series, the Cox regression analysis showed that smoking and passive smoking were not significantly associated with survival [HR: 0.62 (95 % CI 0.31, 1.30); p = 0.19] [HR: 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.08); p = 0.08] respectively. Even though HR are neither statistically significant for smoking nor passive smoking, HR estimates seem to show a protective effect for tobacco smoking, which is highly unlikely. This may indicate some bias or confounding within the study population. However, the data does not allow additional analysis to understand these estimates. This study had potential limitations, one of which was the retrospective nature of the analysis. Definitely, a case control study with healthy controls would have been methodologically more powerful.

Conclusions

Many Moroccan women affected by lung cancer have never smoked (75 %). The relationships between histological type and tobacco found in our series are in agreement with those reported in the literature: adenocarcinoma appears to be the most frequent cell type among never and passive smokers. Furthermore, adenocarcinoma is significantly associated with poorer survival. Smoking does not explain all cases of lung cancer. Environmental exposures, genetic predisposition, hormonal factors, and viral infection may all play a role in lung cancer in women.
  18 in total

Review 1.  A radiologic review of the new TNM classification for lung cancer.

Authors:  Seth Kligerman; Gerald Abbott
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert J Adams; Todd M Brown; Mercedes Carnethon; Shifan Dai; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Cathleen Gillespie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; P Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary M McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Véronique L Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Véronique L Roger; Randall Stafford; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan D Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Estrogen and progesterone receptors in bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  P T Cagle; D R Mody; M R Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Epidemiology of lung cancer in women: risk factors, survival, and screening.

Authors:  Seth Kligerman; Charles White
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Genetic variants associated with longer telomere length are associated with increased lung cancer risk among never-smoking women in Asia: a report from the female lung cancer consortium in Asia.

Authors:  Mitchell J Machiela; Chao Agnes Hsiung; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Jie Seow; Zhaoming Wang; Keitaro Matsuo; Yun-Chul Hong; Adeline Seow; Chen Wu; H Dean Hosgood; Kexin Chen; Jiu-Cun Wang; Wanqing Wen; Richard Cawthon; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Wei Hu; Neil E Caporaso; Jae Yong Park; Chien-Jen Chen; Yeul Hong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Maria Teresa Landi; Hongbing Shen; Charles Lawrence; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; I-Shou Chang; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Hee Nam Kim; Gee-Chen Chang; Bryan A Bassig; Margaret Tucker; Fusheng Wei; Zhihua Yin; She-Juan An; Biyun Qian; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Daru Lu; Jianjun Liu; Hyo-Sung Jeon; Chin-Fu Hsiao; Jae Sook Sung; Jin Hee Kim; Yu-Tang Gao; Ying-Huang Tsai; Yoo Jin Jung; Huan Guo; Zhibin Hu; Amy Hutchinson; Wen-Chang Wang; Robert J Klein; Charles C Chung; In-Jae Oh; Kuan-Yu Chen; Sonja I Berndt; Wei Wu; Jiang Chang; Xu-Chao Zhang; Ming-Shyan Huang; Hong Zheng; Junwen Wang; Xueying Zhao; Yuqing Li; Jin Eun Choi; Wu-Chou Su; Kyong Hwa Park; Sook Whan Sung; Yuh-Min Chen; Li Liu; Chang Hyun Kang; Lingmin Hu; Chung-Hsing Chen; William Pao; Young-Chul Kim; Tsung-Ying Yang; Jun Xu; Peng Guan; Wen Tan; Jian Su; Chih-Liang Wang; Haixin Li; Alan Dart Loon Sihoe; Zhenhong Zhao; Ying Chen; Yi Young Choi; Jen-Yu Hung; Jun Suk Kim; Ho-Il Yoon; Qiuyin Cai; Chien-Chung Lin; In Kyu Park; Ping Xu; Jing Dong; Christopher Kim; Qincheng He; Reury-Perng Perng; Takashi Kohno; Sun-Seog Kweon; Chih-Yi Chen; Roel C H Vermeulen; Junjie Wu; Wei-Yen Lim; Kun-Chieh Chen; Wong-Ho Chow; Bu-Tian Ji; John K C Chan; Minjie Chu; Yao-Jen Li; Jun Yokota; Jihua Li; Hongyan Chen; Yong-Bing Xiang; Chong-Jen Yu; Hideo Kunitoh; Guoping Wu; Li Jin; Yen-Li Lo; Kouya Shiraishi; Ying-Hsiang Chen; Hsien-Chih Lin; Tangchun Wu; Maria Pik Wong; Yi-Long Wu; Pan-Chyr Yang; Baosen Zhou; Min-Ho Shin; Joseph F Fraumeni; Wei Zheng; Dongxin Lin; Stephen J Chanock; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Lung cancer in women: age, smoking, histology, performance status, stage, initial treatment and survival. Population-based study of 20 561 cases.

Authors:  E Radzikowska; P Głaz; K Roszkowski
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Gender and lung cancer.

Authors:  M Patricia Rivera; Diane E Stover
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.878

Review 8.  Incidence of human papilloma virus in lung cancer.

Authors:  Friederike Klein; Waleed F M Amin Kotb; Iver Petersen
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  Lung cancer among women in France. Analysis of the 904 French women with lung cancer included in the KBP-2000-CPHG study of the French College of General Hospital-based Pneumologists (CPHG).

Authors:  Michel Grivaux; Jean Luc Breton; Pierre Bombaron; Pierre Kuntz; François Xavier Lebas; Anas Mehdaoui; Dominique Herman; Philippe David; Jacques Berruchon; Bertrand Delclaux; Mahmoud Zureik; François Blanchon
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Michael J Thun; Lynn A G Ries; Holly L Howe; Hannah K Weir; Melissa M Center; Elizabeth Ward; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Christie Eheman; Robert Anderson; Umed A Ajani; Betsy Kohler; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical Characteristics and Molecular Profiles of Lung Cancer in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tewodros H Gebremariam; Deborah A Haisch; Helen Fernandes; Dawit K Huluka; Amsalu B Binegdie; Mathewos A Woldegeorgis; Wondwosen Ergetie; Aschalew Worku; Lillian M Zerihun; Matthew Cohen; Pierre P Massion; Charles B Sherman; Anjali Saqi; Neil W Schluger
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2021-05-31

2.  TP53 common variants and interaction with PPP1R13L and CD3EAP SNPs and lung cancer risk and smoking behavior in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Jiaoyang Yin; Wei Hou; Ulla Vogel; Xinxin Li; Yegang Ma; Chunhong Wang; Huiwen Wang; Zhenxiang Sun
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Risk Factors for Lung Cancer in the Province of Lecce: Results from the PROTOS Case-Control Study in Salento (Southern Italy).

Authors:  Fabrizio Minichilli; Francesca Gorini; Giovanni De Filippis; Elisa Bustaffa; Anna Maria Raho; Anna Melcarne; Fabrizio Quarta; Giuseppe Maggiore; Adele Idolo; Francesca Serio; Tiziana Grassi; Francesco Bagordo; Idelberto Francesco Castorini; Giovanni Imbriani; Fabrizio Bianchi; Prisco Piscitelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.