Literature DB >> 26432966

Association of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters with histological findings from MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.

Seyed Saeid Dianat1, H Ballentine Carter, Edward M Schaeffer, Ulrik M Hamper, Jonathan I Epstein, Katarzyna J Macura.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Purpose of this pilot study was to correlate quantitative parameters derived from the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) of the prostate with results from MRI guided transrectal ultrasound (MRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy in men with suspected prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients who had 3.0T MP-MRI and subsequent MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy were included and 73 MRI-identified targets were sampled by 177 cores. The pre-biopsy MP-MRI consisted of T2-weighted, diffusion weighted (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images. The association of quantitative MRI measurements with biopsy histopathology findings was assessed by Mann-Whitney U- test and Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: Of 73 targets, biopsy showed benign prostate tissue in 46 (63%), cancer in 23 (31.5%), and atypia/high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in four (5.5%) targets. The median volume of cancer-positive targets was 1.3 cm3. The cancer-positive targets were located in the peripheral zone (56.5%), transition zone (39.1%), and seminal vesicle (4.3%). Nine of 23 (39.1%) cancer-positive targets were higher grade cancer (Gleason grade > 6). Higher grade targets and cancer-positive targets compared to benign lesions exhibited lower mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value (952.7 < 1167.9 < 1278.9), and lower minimal extracellular volume fraction (ECF) (0.13 < 0.185 < 0.213), respectively. The difference in parameters was more pronounced between higher grade cancer and benign lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings from a pilot study indicate that quantitative MRI parameters can predict malignant histology on MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy, which is a valuable technique to ensure adequate sampling of MRI-visible suspicious lesions under TRUS guidance and may impact patient management. The DWI-based quantitative measurement exhibits a stronger association with biopsy findings than the other MRI parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26432966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of two commonly used methods in measurement of cancer volume in prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Viharkumar Patel; Samuel Hubbard; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  Kinematic and mechanical modelling of a novel 4-DOF robotic needle guide for MRI-guided prostate intervention.

Authors:  Pradipta Biswas; Hossein Dehghani; Sakura Sikander; Sang-Eun Song
Journal:  Biomed Eng Adv       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 3.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.

Authors:  Eliodoro Faiella; Domiziana Santucci; Federico Greco; Giulia Frauenfelder; Viola Giacobbe; Giovanni Muto; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Rosario Francesco Grasso
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Editorial in this issue - Prostate Biopsy: What is the future of this old Procedure? The Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Luciano A Favorito
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.