Literature DB >> 1612314

Comparison of precontrast, postcontrast, and delayed CT scanning for the staging of rectal carcinoma.

E B Skriver1, M B Nielsen, S Qvitzau, J Christiansen.   

Abstract

An attempt is made to establish the most appropriate examination procedure for staging rectal carcinoma by computed tomography (CT). Twenty-two patients with rectal carcinoma had CT performed preoperatively. The following three CT sequences were performed in all patients: a precontrast scan with 10-mm slices; a rapid sequence scan with 5-mm slices during bolus injection of contrast medium; and a postcontrast scan after a 10-min delay. Tumor extension and the presence of perirectal lymph nodes were evaluated separately and independently in all three CT sequences according to the TNM classification. All patients had surgical follow-up and the CT scans were compared to the surgical and histopathological findings. There was no significant difference in diagnostic outcome in the three CT procedures. Information obtained by frontal and lateral scout views were compared, and the lateral scout view proved more informative than the frontal scout view. For staging rectal carcinoma, narrow slice scanning and intravenous contrast media are superfluous and should be reserved for special cases. We recommend the use of lateral scout views.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1612314     DOI: 10.1007/bf01888564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  14 in total

1.  Imaging of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  A A Moss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Computed tomography of the rectum with water as contrast agent.

Authors:  A L Baert; L Roex; G Wilms; G Marchal; C Deschepper
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1989

3.  Preoperative and postoperative CT staging of rectosigmoid carcinoma.

Authors:  W M Thompson; R A Halvorsen; W L Foster; L Roberts; R Gibbons
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Detection of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective evaluation of CT and clinical factors.

Authors:  S M McCarthy; D Barnes; K Deveney; A A Moss; H I Goldberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Computed tomography in staging of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  B Adalsteinsson; B Glimelius; S Graffman; A Hemmingsson; L Påhlman
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb

6.  Computed tomographic air enema technique to demonstrate colonic neoplasms.

Authors:  A Solomon; M Michowitz; J Papo; I Yust
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1986

7.  Management of rectal carcinoma: impact of computed tomography.

Authors:  P F van Waes; P R Koehler; M A Feldberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Pre-operative assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer: digital examination, endoluminal sonography or computed tomography?

Authors:  J Beynon; N J Mortensen; D M Foy; J L Channer; J Virjee; P Goddard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence.

Authors:  P C Freeny; W M Marks; J A Ryan; J W Bolen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT.

Authors:  M D Rifkin; S M Ehrlich; G Marks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.