Literature DB >> 26431251

Frequency, Type and Cause of Artifacts in Swept-Source and Cirrus HD Optical Coherence Tomography in Cases of Glaucoma and Suspected Glaucoma.

Sang Yeop Lee1, Hee Jung Kwon2, Hyoung Won Bae1, Sang Jin Seo1, Yun Ha Lee1, Samin Hong1, Gong Je Seong1, Chan Yun Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the frequency, type and cause of imaging artifacts incurred when using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS OCT) and Cirrus HD OCT in the same patients on the same day.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From left eye OCT results of 72 patients, disc area and macular area data could be compared between the two types of OCT. For each scan, the final printout report and source data were examined. For comparison between the two types of OCT, only source image data were used because of differences in the final printout report format.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the artifact frequencies between the two groups in either area (disc area: 35.9% of SS OCT, 42.2% of Cirrus OCT, p = 0.523; Macular area: 24.2% of SS OCT, 22.7% of Cirrus OCT, p = 1.00). The overall results of artifact comparison between the two types of OCTs also showed no significant differences. Boundary misidentification was the most common type of artifact observed, and ocular pathology was the most common cause of artifact in both types of OCTs. Among ocular pathologies, the epiretinal membrane (ERM) was the most common cause of OCT artifact production in both types of OCTs.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the frequency, type and cause of artifacts between SS OCT and Cirrus HD OCT. Artifacts in OCT can influence the interpretation of OCT results. In particular, ERM around the optic disc could contribute to OCT artifacts and should be considered in glaucoma diagnosis or during patient follow-up using OCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cirrus HD optical coherence tomography; comparison of artifact; optical coherence image artifact; swept source optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26431251     DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1075219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  8 in total

1.  Optical Coherence Tomography Segmentation Errors of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Persist Over Time.

Authors:  Nisha Nagarkatti-Gude; Stuart K Gardiner; Brad Fortune; Shaban Demirel; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Automated Segmentation Errors When Using Optical Coherence Tomography to Measure Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Steven L Mansberger; Shivali A Menda; Brad A Fortune; Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Diagnostic Ability of Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Sang Yeop Lee; Hyoung Won Bae; Gong Je Seong; Chan Yun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Artifact Rates for 2D Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Versus 3D Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Volume.

Authors:  Stephanie Choi; Firas Jassim; Edem Tsikata; Ziad Khoueir; Linda Y Poon; Boy Braaf; Benjamin J Vakoc; Brett E Bouma; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Artifacts and Anatomic Variations in Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Atilla Bayer; Ahmet Akman
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-29

6.  The OCT RNFL Probability Map and Artifacts Resembling Glaucomatous Damage.

Authors:  Sol La Bruna; Anvit Rai; Grace Mao; Jennifer Kerr; Heer Amin; Zane Z Zemborain; Ari Leshno; Emmanouil Tsamis; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Matching Misaligned Spectralis OCTs to a Reference Scan in Pediatric Glaucoma with Poor Fixation and Nystagmus.

Authors:  John P Kelly; Francine M Baran; James O Phillips; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Artifact Rates for 2D Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Versus 3D Neuroretinal Rim Thickness Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Elli A Park; Edem Tsikata; Jenny Jyoung Lee; Eric Shieh; Boy Braaf; Benjamin J Vakoc; Brett E Bouma; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.283

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.