Literature DB >> 26430903

Structure of Bolaamphiphile Sophorolipid Micelles Characterized with SAXS, SANS, and MD Simulations.

Sabine Manet1, Anne-Sophie Cuvier1, Claire Valotteau1, Giulia C Fadda2, Javier Perez3, Esra Karakas4,5, Stéphane Abel5, Niki Baccile1.   

Abstract

The micellar structure of sophorolipids, a glycolipid bolaamphiphile, is analyzed using a combination of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Numerical modeling of SAXS curves shows that micellar morphology in the noncharged system (pH< 5) is made of prolate ellipsoids of revolution with core-shell morphology. Opposed to most surfactant systems, the hydrophilic shell has a nonhomogeneous distribution of matter: the shell thickness in the axial direction of the ellipsoid is found to be practically zero, while it measures about 12 Å at its cross-section, thus forming a "coffee bean"-like shape. The use of a contrast-matching SANS experiment shows that the hydrophobic component of sophorolipids is actually distributed in a narrow spheroidal region in the micellar core. These data seem to indicate a complex distribution of sophorolipids within the micelle, divided into at least three domains: a pure hydrophobic core, a hydrophilic shell, and a region of less defined composition in the axial direction of the ellipsoid. To account for these results, we make the hypothesis that sophorolipid molecules acquire various configurations within the micelle including bent and linear, crossing the micellar core. These results are confirmed by MD simulations which do show the presence of multiple sophorolipid configurations when passing from spherical to ellipsoidal aggregates. Finally, we also used Rb(+) and Sr(2+) counterions in combination with anomalous SAXS experiments to probe the distribution of the COO(-) group of sophorolipids upon small pH increase (5 < pH < 7), where repulsive intermicellar interactions become important. The poor ASAXS signal shows that the COO(-) groups are rather diffused in the broad hydrophilic shell rather than at the outer micellar/water interface.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26430903     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  6 in total

1.  Sophorolipid Butyl Ester Diacetate Does Not Affect Macrophage Polarization but Enhances Astrocytic Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Expression at Micromolar Concentrations in Vitro.

Authors:  Alexis M Ziemba; Manoj K Gottipati; Filbert Totsingan; Cheryl M Hanes; Richard A Gross; Michelle R Lennartz; Ryan J Gilbert
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  THE ROLE OF THE ASYMMETRIC BOLAAMPHIPHILIC CHARACTER OF VECAR ON THE KINETIC AND STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF ITS SELF-ASSEMBLY: A MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION STUDY.

Authors:  Hye-Young Kim; Brian R Novak; Bijay Shrestha; S Emma Lee; Dorel Moldovan
Journal:  Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.539

3.  Glucosomes: Glycosylated Vesicle-in-Vesicle Aggregates in Water from pH-Responsive Microbial Glycolipid.

Authors:  Niki Baccile; Patrick Le Griel; Sylvain Prévost; Bernd Everaert; Inge N A Van Bogaert; Sophie Roelants; Wim Soetaert
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.911

4.  Photophysical studies on curcumin-sophorolipid nanostructures: applications in quorum quenching and imaging.

Authors:  Sahana Vasudevan; Asmita A Prabhune
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 5.  Phase Behaviour, Functionality, and Physicochemical Characteristics of Glycolipid Surfactants of Microbial Origin.

Authors:  Karina Sałek; Stephen R Euston; Tomasz Janek
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 6.  Combining Experimental Data and Computational Methods for the Non-Computer Specialist.

Authors:  Reinier Cárdenas; Javier Martínez-Seoane; Carlos Amero
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.