Literature DB >> 26429252

Technical Note: Initial characterization of the new EBT-XD Gafchromic film.

Michael P Grams1, Jon M Gustafson1, Kenneth M Long1, Luis E Fong de los Santos1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the dosimetric accuracy and energy dependence of the new EBT-eXtended Dose (XD) Gafchromic film and to compare the lateral response artifact (LRA) between EBT-XD and EBT3 film.
METHODS: EBT3 and EBT-XD calibration curves were created by exposing films to known doses from 0 to 3000 cGy using a 6 MV beam. To assess the accuracy and dynamic range of EBT-XD, a 60° enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW) was used to deliver a dose range of approximately 200-2900 cGy. Comparison to treatment planning system (TPS) calculation was made using a gamma analysis with 2%/2 mm passing criteria. To assess and compare the LRA between EBT3 and EBT-XD, 21 × 21 cm(2) open fields delivered doses of 1000, 2000, and 3000 cGy to both types of film. Films were placed at the center of the scanner, and ratios of measured to TPS predicted doses were calculated at 50 and 80 mm lateral from the scanner center in order to quantitatively assess the LRA. To evaluate the energy dependence of EBT-XD film, seven known doses ranging from 400 to 3000 cGy were delivered using both 6 and 18 MV beams and the resulting optical densities (ODs) compared.
RESULTS: The gamma passing rate was 99.1% for the 6 MV EDW delivery. EBT-XD film exhibited minimal LRA (<1%) up to 3000 cGy. In contrast, EBT3 demonstrated an under-response of 11.3% and 22.7% at lateral positions of 50 and 80 mm, respectively, for the 3000 cGy exposure. Differences between ODs of the EBT-XD films exposed to known doses from 6 to 18 MV beams were <0.8% suggesting minimal energy dependence throughout this energy range.
CONCLUSIONS: The LRA of EBT-XD is greatly reduced when compared to EBT3. This in combination with its accuracy from 0 to 3000 cGy and minimal energy dependence from 6 to 18 MV makes EBT-XD film well suited for dosimetric measurements in high dose SRS/SBRT applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26429252     DOI: 10.1118/1.4930058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Initial characterization of a gel patch dosimeter for in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  C Matrosic; W Culberson; B Rosen; E Madsen; G Frank; B Bednarz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Correction of lateral response artifacts from flatbed scanners for dual-channel radiochromic film dosimetry.

Authors:  Yuichi Akino; Hiroya Shiomi; Fumiaki Isohashi; Osamu Suzuki; Yuji Seo; Keisuke Tamari; Takero Hirata; Hirokazu Mizuno; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Radiation dose verification of an X-ray based blood irradiator using EBT3 radiochromic films calibrated using Gamma Knife machine.

Authors:  Khaled Soliman; Marouf Adili; Abdullah Alrushoud
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-06-07

4.  Gafchromic EBT-XD film: Dosimetry characterization in high-dose, volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Hideharu Miura; Shuichi Ozawa; Fumika Hosono; Naoki Sumida; Toshiya Okazue; Kiyoshi Yamada; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  A hybrid volumetric dose verification method for single-isocenter multiple-target cranial SRS.

Authors:  Saeed Ahmed; Jeff Kapatoes; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo G Moros; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Monte Carlo calculation of the mass stopping power of EBT3 and EBT-XD films for protons for energy ranges of 50-400 MeV.

Authors:  Chengyu Shi; Chin-Cheng Chen; Dennis Mah; Maria F Chan
Journal:  Precis Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-19

7.  Comprehensive evaluation of the high-resolution diode array for SRS dosimetry.

Authors:  Saeed Ahmed; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo G Moros; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  A method for time-independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient-specific QA results at any time postirradiation?

Authors:  Leon Dunn; Guy Godwin; James Hellyer; Xiaolei Xu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.