Literature DB >> 26428811

Validation of a simple response-time measure of listening effort.

Carina Pals1, Anastasios Sarampalis2, Hedderik van Rijn2, Deniz Başkent3.   

Abstract

This study compares two response-time measures of listening effort that can be combined with a clinical speech test for a more comprehensive evaluation of total listening experience; verbal response times to auditory stimuli (RT(aud)) and response times to a visual task (RTs(vis)) in a dual-task paradigm. The listening task was presented in five masker conditions; no noise, and two types of noise at two fixed intelligibility levels. Both the RTs(aud) and RTs(vis) showed effects of noise. However, only RTs(aud) showed an effect of intelligibility. Because of its simplicity in implementation, RTs(aud) may be a useful effort measure for clinical applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26428811     DOI: 10.1121/1.4929614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Natale; Sterling W Sheffield; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Mary S Dietrich; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Sebastian Rählmann; Ulrike Lemke; Jana Besser
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Age-Related Changes in Voice Emotion Recognition by Postlingually Deafened Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Pupillometry Assessment of Speech Recognition and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Francesca Yoshie Russo; Michel Hoen; Chadlia Karoui; Thomas Demarcy; Marine Ardoint; Maria-Pia Tuset; Daniele De Seta; Olivier Sterkers; Ghizlène Lahlou; Isabelle Mosnier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Margaret E Richter; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Comparisons of the Sensitivity and Reliability of Multiple Measures of Listening Effort.

Authors:  Nicholas P Giuliani; Carolyn J Brown; Yu-Hsiang Wu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 8.  Behavioral Assessment of Listening Effort Using a Dual-Task Paradigm.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Gagné; Jana Besser; Ulrike Lemke
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Chantel Ritter; Tara Vongpaisal
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Effect of Spectral Channels on Speech Recognition, Comprehension, and Listening Effort in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Carina Pals; Anastasios Sarampalis; Andy Beynon; Thomas Stainsby; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.