Literature DB >> 26428695

A conserved charged single α-helix with a putative steric role in paraspeckle formation.

László Dobson1, László Nyitray2, Zoltán Gáspári1.   

Abstract

Paraspeckles are subnuclear particles involved in the regulation of mRNA expression. They are formed by the association of DBHS family proteins and the NEAT1 long noncoding RNA. Here, we show that a recently identified structural motif, the charged single α-helix, is largely conserved in the DBHS family. Based on the available structural data and a previously suggested multimerization scheme of DBHS proteins, we built a structural model of a (PSPC1/NONO)(n) multimer that might have relevance in paraspeckle formation. Our model contains an extended coiled-coil region that is followed by and partially overlaps with the predicted charged single α-helix. We suggest that the charged single α-helix can act as an elastic ruler governing the exact positioning of the dimeric core structures relative to each other during paraspeckle assembly along the NEAT1 noncoding RNA.
© 2015 Dobson et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  charged single α-helix; coiled coil; multimerization; paraspeckle; structural modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26428695      PMCID: PMC4647456          DOI: 10.1261/rna.053058.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


INTRODUCTION

Paraspeckles are subnuclear bodies in eukaryotic cells involved in gene regulation, although their exact physiological role is still elusive (Fox et al. 2002; Fox and Lamond 2010; Nakagawa and Hirose 2012). They were shown to sequester mRNA molecules containing A-to-I edited sites and inverted Alu-repeats (Chen et al. 2008; Chen and Carmichael 2009) and thus hinder their cytoplasmic transport and translation. The main protein components of paraspeckles assemble along the long isoform of the NEAT1 noncoding RNA (lncRNA) acting as an architectural scaffold (Clemson et al. 2009; Sasaki et al. 2009). The core proteins forming the paraspeckle, such as NONO, PSPC1, and SFPQ, are closely related and contain a characteristic arrangement of two RRM (RNA recognition motif) domains, a specific NOPS segment, and a coiled-coil region, together referred to as the DBHS (Drosophila behavior, human splicing) structural motif (Staub et al. 2004). The charged single α-helix (CSAH) is a recently identified structural motif (Süveges et al. 2009; Gáspári et al. 2012). CSAHs exhibit high charge density and regularly alternating blocks of positively and negatively charged residues (Knight et al. 2005; Süveges et al. 2009; Swanson and Sivaramakrishnan 2014). When these blocks consist of lysine and glutamate, a directed interaction between them is responsible to confer stability in the single helical form (Baker et al. 2015). Although many CSAHs contain more arginines than lysines (Süveges et al. 2009), we are not aware of any detailed study on arginine–glutamate interactions. CSAHs have been shown to act as unusual elastic elements by exerting a constant force during their progressive unfolding (Wolny et al. 2014). The exact functional role of CSAH motifs has only been characterized in myosin VI and X where their unique mechanical properties enable them to act as an extension to the lever arm (Spudich and Sivaramakrishnan 2010). Our previous surveys of CSAH-containing proteins in SwissProt—using a strict consensus of the available methods to minimize the number of false-positive hits—indicated that NONO and some other proteins involved in paraspeckle formation, but not all of them, contain a CSAH motif (Süveges et al. 2009; Gáspári et al. 2012). However, both the increase in the number of available sequences and our observation that CSAHs are preferentially associated with RNA-binding proteins (Gáspári et al. 2012) justifies a more detailed investigation of proteins of the DBHS family to elucidate the occurrence and possible role of CSAHs in these proteins. A complete atomic-level structural description of paraspeckles is not known in full detail, although the structure of a heterodimer formed by the NONO and PSPC1 proteins has recently been solved (Passon et al. 2012). This structure revealed a previously unobserved relative orientation of the RRM domains and a noncanonical antiparallel right-handed coiled coil as part of the dimer interface. The amino- and carboxy-terminal disordered regions and the carboxy-terminal part of the predicted coiled coil including the previously identified CSAH segment in NONO are missing from this structure. Based on investigations of paraspeckle formation by truncated variants of PSPC1, the authors proposed a scheme for higher-order organization of the PSPC1/NONO dimers involving the extended coiled-coil region. In this region, they identified a hendecad repeat pattern distinct from the usual heptad repeat characteristic of left-handed coiled coils but similar to that in the right-handed coiled-coil region observed in the dimer structure. Recently, while our manuscript was in preparation, X-ray structures of human SFPQ (splicing factor proline-glutamine-rich) became available (Lee et al. 2015). This structure revealed a similar mode of dimerization as for the PSPC1/NONO heterodimer and the presence of an extended single α-helical region. In the crystals, additional canonical coiled-coil interactions were observed between neighboring dimers. These interactions are different from those proposed for the extended coiled-coil region of the PSPC1/NONO heterodimer. Other recent studies described the formation of SFPQ/NONO heterotetramers (Snijders et al. 2015). In this study, we analyzed the DBHS protein family with bioinformatic methods and found that the presence of a CSAH segment is a general feature of the family. To assess the structural role of the CSAH region, we built a first-approximation structural model of a multimeric form of a PSPC1/NONO complex, based on the proposed mode of higher-order association of these structures (Passon et al. 2012). This model is consistent with the presence of a CSAH segment and might provide a plausible explanation of its structural role.

RESULTS

The charged single α-helix is a conserved feature of DBHS proteins

Our CSAH identification method relies on the consensus of two conceptually different methods, SCAN4CSAH and FT_CHARGE (Süveges et al. 2009; Gáspári et al. 2012). Detailed analysis led to an interesting observation—namely, that the more stringent of the two methods, FT_CHARGE (Gáspári et al. 2012), predicted CSAH segments in all three human paraspeckle proteins, PSCPC1, NONO, and SFPQ, whereas the other approach, SCAN4CSAH, did not. However, setting the minimum length of CSAHs to 30 residues for SCAN4CSAH yields consensus hits for all three proteins. The CSAH segments are located at the carboxy-terminal (distal) region of the predicted extended coiled-coil region, partially overlapping with it (Fig. 1). Notably, the predicted CSAH segment in PSPC1 is shorter than in NONO and SFPQ. However, a single Gln → Glu change at position 349 of PSPC1 results in a CSAH prediction of the same length as in the other two proteins even with default parameters (i.e., a 40-residue minimal CSAH length for SCAN4CSAH). Nevertheless, here we accepted the shorter predicted CSAH as a conservative estimate of the occurrence of this motif.
FIGURE 1.

Partial sequence alignment of human core paraspeckle proteins with predicted, observed, and modeled features. Start and end positions of the segments shown are marked. The coiled-coil segment identified by SOCKET in the PSPC1/NONO dimer structure (3SDE) is underlined and the heptad positions are indicated (labels between the two sequences). Truncation before the residue marked with “‡” results in the loss of PSPC1 localization to paraspeckles (Passon et al. 2012). Hydrophobic residues in the hendecad repeat are highlighted in light and dark gray for the crystallized and the extended regions, respectively. In the case of PSPC1 and NONO, the heptad positions considered during model building and those obtained by SOCKET for the generated hexamer are shown (labels “model” and “socket”, above and below the NONO and PSPC1 sequences, respectively). For SFPQ, residues involved in coiled-coil formation of the dimer are underlined (based on analysis of the 4WIJ structure, note that the coiled coil is not symmetric despite being homodimeric, i.e., not all underlined residues participate in the coiled coil in both subunits). Residues identified to form the interdimer left-handed coiled coil are underlined with a double line and the heptad positions are indicated (Lee et al. 2015). The segment forming the extended single α-helix in the 4WIJ crystal structure is marked with a wave.

Partial sequence alignment of human core paraspeckle proteins with predicted, observed, and modeled features. Start and end positions of the segments shown are marked. The coiled-coil segment identified by SOCKET in the PSPC1/NONO dimer structure (3SDE) is underlined and the heptad positions are indicated (labels between the two sequences). Truncation before the residue marked with “‡” results in the loss of PSPC1 localization to paraspeckles (Passon et al. 2012). Hydrophobic residues in the hendecad repeat are highlighted in light and dark gray for the crystallized and the extended regions, respectively. In the case of PSPC1 and NONO, the heptad positions considered during model building and those obtained by SOCKET for the generated hexamer are shown (labels “model” and “socket”, above and below the NONO and PSPC1 sequences, respectively). For SFPQ, residues involved in coiled-coil formation of the dimer are underlined (based on analysis of the 4WIJ structure, note that the coiled coil is not symmetric despite being homodimeric, i.e., not all underlined residues participate in the coiled coil in both subunits). Residues identified to form the interdimer left-handed coiled coil are underlined with a double line and the heptad positions are indicated (Lee et al. 2015). The segment forming the extended single α-helix in the 4WIJ crystal structure is marked with a wave. To assess the general occurrence of CSAH segments in DBHS proteins, we performed a standard BLASTP search with all three human DBHS proteins (NONO_HUMAN, PSPC1_HUMAN, and SFPQ_HUMAN) on NCBI's “nr” database (accessed on 19 September 2014). This search identified 753 different proteins altogether (Supplemental Table S1). These hits were filtered according to the following criteria: (i) Sequences should contain two RRM domains with hidden Markov model (HMM) alignment length between 55 and 80 residues and (ii) with a maximum interdomain distance of 50 residues, and (iii) sequences were also required to contain a coiled coil of either at least 30 or 60 residues long (see below) and (iv) not closer than 30 and not farther than 120 residues from these domains. Coiled coils predicted by either ncoils or paircoil2 were accepted. The filtered sequences, all of which also contained a predicted NOPS domain, were then analyzed for the presence of predicted CSAH segments and its dependence on the length of the coiled coil. We found that the vast majority of the identified proteins with a coiled coil longer than 60 residues contain a recognizable CSAH region (Table 1). Most of the identified CSAH segments are located after the identified coiled-coil regions, typically in partial overlap with its distal part (Fig. 1).
TABLE 1.

Summary of CSAH-containing sequences in the BLAST hits filtered for the presence of two RRM domains and a coiled coil (see text for details)

Summary of CSAH-containing sequences in the BLAST hits filtered for the presence of two RRM domains and a coiled coil (see text for details)

The extended coiled-coil region of NONO and PSPC1 can be modeled as a right-handed superhelix

To get closer to the understanding of the functional role of the conserved CSAH segment in paraspeckle-forming proteins, we built a structural model of the (PSPC1/NONO) multimer. As a first step, we modeled the extended coiled-coil region for which no experimental structure is available. The authors of the crystal structure of the NONO-PSPC1 dimer observed that (i) the predicted extended coiled-coil region of the proteins plays an important role the higher-order organization of the paraspeckle proteins and (ii) this segment exhibits a hendecad repeat similar to the observed coiled coil. Thus, according to the correspondence between repeat pattern and coiled-coil geometry (Offer et al. 2002; Gruber and Lupas 2003), it can be reasonably assumed that this part might form a structurally similar, noncanonical, right-handed coiled coil (Passon et al. 2012). Based on these considerations, we prepared antiparallel coiled-coil models corresponding to the appropriate segments of the human NONO and PSPC1 proteins. First, we generated a right-handed coiled-coil backbone that matches the geometry of the coiled coil in the 3SDE structure well. This resulted in a superhelix with a radius of 5.5 Å and a pitch of 295 Å. Although the coiled-coil region in the dimer has a nonuniform radius, for simplicity we used a fixed radius for our model. We note that this radius is quite large among known coiled coils, and to identify the full region described as coiled coil in the PSPC1/NONO heterodimer (Passon et al. 2012), the distance cutoff in the coiled-coil recognition program SOCKET should be set to the unusually large value of 9 Å. Moreover, the corresponding region is not fully recognized even with this large cutoff in the most complete structure of the SFPQ homodimer (Lee et al. 2015). In the next step, we have added the side-chains to the backbone so that the hydrophobic residues with 11-residue periodicity were intended to occupy positions facing toward the other helix. The hendecad repeat could be best matched with an “abcdefgdefg” variant of the classical heptad pattern where the “a” and “d” positions are expected to be hydrophobic. The two helices were positioned so that the first “d” positions in the hendecad face hydrophobic residues in “a” positions in the other helix in a symmetric fashion (Supplemental Fig. S1). This intended pairing scheme was not exactly matching but still reasonably compatible with the results of a SOCKET analysis of the generated coiled-coil structure (Fig. 1; Supplemental Fig. S1). As controls and exploratory models, coiled coils with other register pairings including a “standard” left-handed superhelix were generated, but none of them produced more consistent correspondence between the repeats and coiled-coil geometry (not shown). However, although side-chain–side-chain interactions in our model are not considered to be necessarily accurate, the general architecture of the multimeric assemblies could be reasonably well captured, as we argue below.

The paraspeckle multimer is an elongated assembly with no strict stoichiometry

To assess the role of the CSAH segments, we built multimeric complexes using the experimental structures of the PSPC1/NONO dimers and the modeled extended coiled coils. The approach is similar to the computer modeling of the full two-headed myosin II molecule (Offer and Knight 1996). Although the model proposed by Passon et al. (2012) allows for arbitrary stoichiometry, we have chosen a hexameric structure as the smallest one where the central PSPC1/NONO dimer (chains C and D in the hexamer, colored green and blue–green in Fig. 2) is paired with another dimer on both sides (consisting of chains A/B and E/F, colored red/yellow and cyan/blue in Fig. 2, respectively), thus it is potentially capable of revealing all possible additional interactions within the limitations of the model. Thus, the choice of a hexameric structure as a first model is purely technical and we are not aware of any observations of hexameric complexes in vivo. The hexamer forms an elongated structure with the PSPC1/NONO dimers pointing outward. Along the long axis of the hexamer, the dimers are rotated ∼120° relative to each other and with an approximate translation of 140 Å along the axis of the extended coiled coil (Fig. 2). We note that these values are dependent on how we model the exact pairings (see above) in the extended coiled-coil region as it influences the exact orientation of the two constituent helices relative to each other. The hendecad repeat structure of the coiled coil in the core dimers (denoted ccAB, ccCD, and ccEF in the hexamer) is not continuous with the repeat in the extended coiled-coil region (forming coiled coils ccBC and ccDE; Fig. 1), which is reflected by the fact that ccAB, ccCD, and ccEF are not coaxial with ccBC or ccDE. Instead, the different coiled-coil interactions occur at the two opposite sides of the helices leading to a kink in the extended helix relative to those in the core dimers. In addition, regions where three helices lie beside each other are formed, leading to a three-helix α-sheet structure according to the classification of the CC+ database (Testa et al. 2009). During an exploratory 20-nsec molecular dynamics simulation, the CSAH regions remained largely helical. The simulation also indicated the possible formation of more extended interactions between the PSPC1/NONO dimers (Supplemental Tables S3, S4; Supplemental Figs S2, S3).
FIGURE 2.

Side (left) and axis (right) views of the (PSPC1/NONO) hexamer model. The six chains are shown in different colors: chains A (red), C (green), and E (cyan) correspond to PSPC1, whereas chains B (yellow), D (blue–green), and F (blue) to NONO. Note that the first and last chains (red and blue) do not contain the extended coiled-coil and CSAH regions. Figure prepared with Chimera (Pettersen et al. 2004).

Side (left) and axis (right) views of the (PSPC1/NONO) hexamer model. The six chains are shown in different colors: chains A (red), C (green), and E (cyan) correspond to PSPC1, whereas chains B (yellow), D (blue–green), and F (blue) to NONO. Note that the first and last chains (red and blue) do not contain the extended coiled-coil and CSAH regions. Figure prepared with Chimera (Pettersen et al. 2004). Using the same principles as for building the hexameric structure, we generated large multimeric assemblies of PSPC1/NONO dimers. These are expected to correspond to a physiologically more relevant state than the hexamer model. The shape of these multimers is elongated and they display a regular arrangement of outward-pointing RRM domains (Fig. 3).
FIGURE 3.

Different views of a large paraspeckle protein multimer model containing 22 core dimers and colored according to chain ID. The modeled arrangement results in a spiraling relative orientation of the subsequent tandem RRM regions. Figures prepared with Chimera (Pettersen et al. 2004).

Different views of a large paraspeckle protein multimer model containing 22 core dimers and colored according to chain ID. The modeled arrangement results in a spiraling relative orientation of the subsequent tandem RRM regions. Figures prepared with Chimera (Pettersen et al. 2004).

DISCUSSION

Our observations strongly suggest that a charged region with strong propensity to form CSAH segments is present in the DBHS family and is a characteristic part of these proteins. If this is true, then this is the first protein family in which a CSAH segment is recognized as a regularly occurring motif. In the PSPC1/NONO dimer, the predicted CSAH segment starts close to the carboxy-terminal residue observable in the X-ray structure and overlaps with the predicted extended coiled-coil region (Fig. 1). This is consistent with the recent experimental structure of SFPQ (Lee et al. 2015) where the presence of a long single α-helix was observed. Although CSAHs are expected to be stable even in solution and in the SFPQ structure this helix is likely stabilized by crystal contacts, the observed helical structure can still be regarded as a strong support for our claim. No structure predictions can be 100% accurate, and it has been specifically noted that predicted CSAH segments often overlap with predicted coiled coils (Peckham and Knight 2009; Süveges et al. 2009). However, we proposed that this might indicate that the same segment can form either CSAHs or weak coiled coils depending on the environment (Süveges et al. 2009). In our structural model of the paraspeckle multimer, the overlapping part of the predicted CSAH segments with the ccBC and ccEF coiled-coil regions were modeled within the extended coiled coils. Because of the kink in the long helices, the CSAH segments point slightly away from the core dimers without causing steric clashes. When the geometry of the predicted CSAH segments is adjusted to match that of a standard α-helix (i.e., the coiled-coil specific supercoiling is “removed”), this feature is even more pronounced (not shown). The proximal part of the CSAH segments is recognized by the SOCKET algorithm as part of the coiled coil, consistent both with the overlapping predictions and with our earlier suggestion that CSAH segments might form weak coiled coils under certain circumstances (Süveges et al. 2009). Per-residue energy for the modeled extended coiled-coil region estimated with Coilcheck+ is 0.643 kJ/mol, whereas this value is −2.677 kJ/mol for the coiled coil region in the PSPC1/NONO dimer, indicating an inherent instability for the interdimer superhelix. We propose that the transition from a weak coiled coil to a single helix along the structure is more or less continuous in the case of the paraspeckle multimer. This inherent instability is consistent with the notion that the presence of the NEAT1 lncRNA is required for paraspeckle assembly (i.e., multimerization does not occur in the absence of the scaffold RNA). In our model of the (PSPC1/NONO)3 hexamer, the carboxy-terminal ends of the CSAHs form an approximately planar four-stranded helical structure with the helices of the coiled coil of the central dimer, close to the cavity in the core PSPC1/NONO dimers, occurring between their coiled-coil and RRM regions. We note that this general arrangement is preserved even when the extended coiled-coil region is modeled with different registers and/or pairings. Thus, we believe that this type of robustness of our model might indicate that it reasonably reflects the general architecture of the paraspeckle assembly—provided our basic assumptions are valid—even if the details of side-chain interactions are not modeled accurately. We note that our model does not contain the amino- and carboxy-terminal disordered segments of PSPC1 and NONO, but the modeled CSAH region is ideally located to guide the interaction between one core dimer and the carboxy-terminal unstructured fragment of its neighbor. Our exploratory molecular dynamics calculations lend support both for the flexibility of the extended coiled coil and the ability for the CSAH to make and organize additional contacts within the multimer (Supplemental Fig. S2). Our proposed mode of coiled-coil-mediated multimerization of PSPC1/NONO dimers is different from that observed for the SFPQ crystal structure (Lee et al. 2015). Our model is based on the considerations of Passon and coworkers and thus features a right-handed coiled coil with a hendecad repeat, whereas Lee et al. (2015) observed a short canonical left-handed coiled coil with a heptad pattern. DBHS proteins are highly versatile and, although PSPC1 and NONO were proposed to form elongated multimers in paraspeckles (Passon et al. 2012) and assemble on the NEAT1 lncRNA, SFPQ has been shown to form stable heterotetramers with NONO (Snijders et al. 2015). Thus, it can be expected that the mode of interaction between dimers can be different in the two cases. In summary, the most likely explanation for the apparent inconsistencies between observations on DBHS protein assembly is that the extended coiled-coil/CSAH segment of DBHS proteins is highly versatile and can mediate a number of different interactions and multimerization modes in the different proteins in a context-dependent manner, as exemplified by the behavior of NONO/SFPQ tetramers and multimers depending on the ionic strength applied (Snijders et al. 2015). Moreover, NONO can bind to specific DNA segments and is involved in transcriptional activation (Park et al. 2013; Yadav et al. 2014). NONO was shown to bind double-stranded DNA independently of RNA and single-stranded DNA (Yang et al. 1993). The exact structural forms involved in these interactions can be yet again different from those already investigated and might represent another extension to the structural versatility of DBHS proteins. Paraspeckles are assembled along NEAT1 lncRNA molecules that might also provide additional stabilizing interactions for the complex ribonucleoprotein particle. We suggest that the CSAH segments might act as a “ruler” by guiding the positioning of the core dimers along the RNA molecule. In this respect, the mechanical properties of CSAH segments might provide the required elasticity for the assembly and could help to adapt to the shape and flexibility of the long RNA molecule scaffolds. The concept of a number of regularly spaced RNA interaction domains, as proposed by Passon et al. (2012) and modeled here, is compatible with the high fraction of repeat motifs in the NEAT1 lncRNA (Supplemental Table S2). This hypothesis assumes that the primary site of RNA–protein interactions within the paraspeckle are the RRM domains, although other interactions cannot be ruled out. It is unlikely, however, that the CSAH segments themselves would be involved in RNA binding; thus, as discussed earlier, their prevalence in RNA-binding proteins should be rationalized with a different functional role. It should nevertheless be noted that recent studies revealed that methylation of arginines in the coiled-coil/CSAH region of NONO influences its association with mRNA molecules (Hu et al. 2015). Two of the three positions where Arg → Lys mutations caused similar effects (Arg357 and Arg365) are included in our model and point toward the surface of the modeled assembly. Interestingly, methylated arginines identified in SFPQ are not localized to the predicted coiled-coil/CSAH region (Snijders et al. 2015). The shape of the (PSPC1/NONO)3 assembly is elongated and can still be lengthened by adding additional dimers. Thus, large assemblies with variable stoichiometry can be formed (Fig. 3). This is consistent with the elongated cylindrical shape with variable length but a fixed diameter observed for paraspeckle structures, although the dimensions of the full particles are an order of magnitude larger than those of our model of a single assembly. In the model proposed by Nakagawa and Hirose (2012), such assemblies could be placed either along the radius of the particle making contact with multiple sites of a single lncRNA or along the long axis, binding a number of RNA molecules at identical sites. It should also be noted that the orientation of the proteins within the particle might be much different than speculated here—for example, the flexibility and/or different pairings of the extended coiled coil might allow a curvature perpendicular to the long axis of our model. DBHS proteins are highly versatile and can participate in a number of diverse interactions. For example, NONO can form heterotetramers with SFPQ (Snijders et al. 2015), the architecture of which can be markedly different from those proposed here allowing for undefined stoichiometry. Our study suggests an indispensable steric role for CSAH segments in the protein family, and their presence might be essential for the structural and functional versatility of DBHS proteins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sequence analysis

Paraspeckle proteins were identified with a standard BLASTP search (Altschul et al. 1990) on NCBI's “nr” database complemented by domain composition analysis. Coiled-coil and CSAH regions were predicted with coils (Lupas et al. 1991) and paircoil2 (McDonnell et al. 2006), as well as with SCAN4CSAH and FT_CHARGE (Süveges et al. 2009; Gáspári et al. 2012). RRM and NOPS domains were identified with HMMER (Eddy 2011) using the appropriate profiles in Pfam (accessions PF00076.17 and PF08075.6). All methods were run with default parameters except that the minimum lengths of CSAH segments were set to 30 in SCAN4CSAH. Similarity filtering was performed using CD-hit (Li and Godzik 2006).

Structural modeling

Our basic scheme is similar to that implemented in the recently prepared CCBuilder web server (Wood et al. 2014), published after our modeling pipeline was finalized. Backbone coordinates of the extended coiled coil were generated using Crick's parametric equations as described by Offer and Sessions (1995). Coiled-coil parameters were estimated by running a grid search by iterating over values of R0 (superhelix radius) from 4.5 Å to 6.0 Å by steps of 0.05 Å and P (pitch) from 250 Å to 310 Å by steps of 1 Å. One chain of the coiled coil was fit to chain B of 3SDE over residues 262–303 with lsqman (Kleywegt and Jones 1994) and the RMSD (root-mean-square deviation) of the other chain of the superhelix with respect to chain A of 3SDE (residues 274–315) was monitored with an in-house script. Side-chains were added based on a residue library generated from antiparallel coiled-coil structures identified with SOCKET (Walshaw and Woolfson 2001) from PDB SELECT (2012 November release, Griep and Hobohm 2010) after discarding transmembrane proteins listed in the PDBTM database release 2013 September 27 (Kozma et al. 2013). Residues with incomplete side-chains were excluded. Residues were extracted and stored in diamide form—that is, the α and carbonyl carbon atoms of the preceding residue and the amide nitrogen and α carbon atoms of the next residue were also stored. These atoms were used when fitting the side-chains to the coiled-coil backbone. Residues with matching type and SOCKET-assigned heptad position were selected randomly and fit to the backbone by lsqman. The final coiled-coil model was generated from the backbone coordinates of the model and the side-chain coordinates (starting with the β carbon) of the fitted diamides. An antiparallel coiled coil of 2 × 122 residues was generated and the side-chains were added to its central region by ensuring their appropriate pairings. During the construction of the final model, residues in the polyglycine region, not part of the modeled sequence, were omitted. To build the hexamer, three 3SDE dimers and two modeled extended coiled-coil regions were put together by fitting the first six residues of the coiled-coil chains to residues 313–318 of chain A and residues 297–302 of chain B in 3SDE. The structures were merged so that the last residues from the dimeric cores were 315 from chain A and 299 from chain B, coordinates for rest of the modeled chains were taken from the fitted coiled-coil structures. This resulted in an acceptable geometry of the peptide bonds at the site of merging, as checked by the PDB validation server. Stability of the SOCKET-assigned coiled-coil regions was estimated using the Coilcheck+ web server (Sunitha et al. 2012). Secondary structure elements were identified with DSSPCont (Andersen et al. 2002) and intersubunit interfaces in the multimeric structure were analyzed using the PISA web service (Krissinel and Henrick 2007). Energy minimizations and molecular dynamics calculations were performed with GROMACS 4.5.5 (Hess et al. 2008).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplemental material is available for this article.
  41 in total

1.  Socket: a program for identifying and analysing coiled-coil motifs within protein structures.

Authors:  J Walshaw; D N Woolfson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Generalized Crick equations for modeling noncanonical coiled coils.

Authors:  Gerald Offer; Matthew R Hicks; Derek N Woolfson
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Harnessing the unique structural properties of isolated α-helices.

Authors:  Carter J Swanson; Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The structure of the head-tail junction of the myosin molecule.

Authors:  G Offer; P Knight
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  MENepsilon/beta noncoding RNAs are essential for structural integrity of nuclear paraspeckles.

Authors:  Yasnory T F Sasaki; Takashi Ideue; Miho Sano; Toutai Mituyama; Tetsuro Hirose
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  An architectural role for a nuclear noncoding RNA: NEAT1 RNA is essential for the structure of paraspeckles.

Authors:  Christine M Clemson; John N Hutchinson; Sergio A Sara; Alexander W Ensminger; Archa H Fox; Andrew Chess; Jeanne B Lawrence
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  The transcription-splicing protein NonO/p54nrb and three NonO-interacting proteins bind to distal enhancer region and augment rhodopsin expression.

Authors:  Sharda P Yadav; Hong Hao; Hyun-Jin Yang; Marie-Audrey I Kautzmann; Matthew Brooks; Jacob Nellissery; Bernward Klocke; Martin Seifert; Anand Swaroop
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  The predicted coiled-coil domain of myosin 10 forms a novel elongated domain that lengthens the head.

Authors:  Peter J Knight; Kavitha Thirumurugan; Yuhui Xu; Fei Wang; Arnout P Kalverda; Walter F Stafford; James R Sellers; Michelle Peckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Protein arginine methyltransferase CARM1 attenuates the paraspeckle-mediated nuclear retention of mRNAs containing IRAlus.

Authors:  Shi-Bin Hu; Jian-Feng Xiang; Xiang Li; Yefen Xu; Wei Xue; Min Huang; Catharine C Wong; Cari A Sagum; Mark T Bedford; Li Yang; Donghang Cheng; Ling-Ling Chen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  CCBuilder: an interactive web-based tool for building, designing and assessing coiled-coil protein assemblies.

Authors:  Christopher W Wood; Marc Bruning; Amaurys Á Ibarra; Gail J Bartlett; Andrew R Thomson; Richard B Sessions; R Leo Brady; Derek N Woolfson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  7 in total

1.  Structural basis of the zinc-induced cytoplasmic aggregation of the RNA-binding protein SFPQ.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Mitchell Ringuet; Andrew E Whitten; Sofia Caria; Yee Wa Lim; Rahul Badhan; Victor Anggono; Mihwa Lee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  The Role of RNA in Biological Phase Separations.

Authors:  Marta M Fay; Paul J Anderson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The DBHS proteins SFPQ, NONO and PSPC1: a multipurpose molecular scaffold.

Authors:  Gavin J Knott; Charles S Bond; Archa H Fox
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Inhaled Pollutants: The Molecular Scene behind Respiratory and Systemic Diseases Associated with Ultrafine Particulate Matter.

Authors:  Hussein Traboulsi; Necola Guerrina; Matthew Iu; Dusica Maysinger; Parisa Ariya; Carolyn J Baglole
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  PlaToLoCo: the first web meta-server for visualization and annotation of low complexity regions in proteins.

Authors:  Patryk Jarnot; Joanna Ziemska-Legiecka; Laszlo Dobson; Matthew Merski; Pablo Mier; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; John M Hancock; Zsuzsanna Dosztányi; Lisanna Paladin; Marco Necci; Damiano Piovesan; Silvio C E Tosatto; Vasilis J Promponas; Marcin Grynberg; Aleksandra Gruca
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Disentangling the complexity of low complexity proteins.

Authors:  Pablo Mier; Lisanna Paladin; Stella Tamana; Sophia Petrosian; Borbála Hajdu-Soltész; Annika Urbanek; Aleksandra Gruca; Dariusz Plewczynski; Marcin Grynberg; Pau Bernadó; Zoltán Gáspári; Christos A Ouzounis; Vasilis J Promponas; Andrey V Kajava; John M Hancock; Silvio C E Tosatto; Zsuzsanna Dosztanyi; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Distribution of disease-causing germline mutations in coiled-coils implies an important role of their N-terminal region.

Authors:  Zsofia E Kalman; Bálint Mészáros; Zoltán Gáspári; Laszlo Dobson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.