Jeffrey M Miller1,2, Benjamin A Everett1, Maria A Oquendo1,2, R Todd Ogden1,3, J John Mann1,2, Ramin V Parsey4. 1. Division of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with abnormalities in the serotonin transporter (5-HTT), but specific in vivo findings have been discrepant. Using positron emission tomography (PET) and [(11)C]DASB, we compared 5-HTT binding between unmedicated depressed BD subjects and healthy volunteers (HVs). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: 5-HTT binding in six brain regions was compared between 17 depressed, unmedicated BD subjects and 31 HVs, using the outcome measure of VT/fP (proportional to the total number of available transporters). Alternative outcome measures were examined as well. 47% of BD were BP I; and 65% reported a prior suicide attempt. PRINCIPAL OBSERVATIONS: 5-HTT binding (VT/fP ) did not differ between BD and HV groups considering six brain regions of interest simultaneously (P = 0.24). In contrast, alternative outcome measures (BPF*, BPP*, and BPND*) indicated lower binding in BD compared with HV across these six regions of interest (BPF*: P = 0.047; BPP*: P = 0.032; BPND*: P = 0.031). 5-HTT binding was unrelated to suicide attempt history, depression severity, bipolar subtype, or history of past substance use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of outcome measure strongly affects comparisons of serotonin transporter binding using PET with [(11)C]DASB. We do not find evidence of abnormal 5-HTT binding in bipolar depression using our primary outcome measure, VT /fP . However, we did observe lower 5-HTT binding in BD with alternative outcome measures that are frequently used with [(11)C]DASB. Relative merits and assumptions of different outcome measures are discussed. Evaluation in larger samples and during different mood states, including remission, is warranted.
OBJECTIVES:Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with abnormalities in the serotonin transporter (5-HTT), but specific in vivo findings have been discrepant. Using positron emission tomography (PET) and [(11)C]DASB, we compared 5-HTT binding between unmedicated depressed BD subjects and healthy volunteers (HVs). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:5-HTT binding in six brain regions was compared between 17 depressed, unmedicated BD subjects and 31 HVs, using the outcome measure of VT/fP (proportional to the total number of available transporters). Alternative outcome measures were examined as well. 47% of BD were BP I; and 65% reported a prior suicide attempt. PRINCIPAL OBSERVATIONS: 5-HTT binding (VT/fP ) did not differ between BD and HV groups considering six brain regions of interest simultaneously (P = 0.24). In contrast, alternative outcome measures (BPF*, BPP*, and BPND*) indicated lower binding in BD compared with HV across these six regions of interest (BPF*: P = 0.047; BPP*: P = 0.032; BPND*: P = 0.031). 5-HTT binding was unrelated to suicide attempt history, depression severity, bipolar subtype, or history of past substance use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of outcome measure strongly affects comparisons of serotonin transporter binding using PET with [(11)C]DASB. We do not find evidence of abnormal 5-HTT binding in bipolar depression using our primary outcome measure, VT /fP . However, we did observe lower 5-HTT binding in BD with alternative outcome measures that are frequently used with [(11)C]DASB. Relative merits and assumptions of different outcome measures are discussed. Evaluation in larger samples and during different mood states, including remission, is warranted.
Authors: V Arango; M D Underwood; M Boldrini; H Tamir; S A Kassir; S Hsiung; J J Chen; J J Mann Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: R V Parsey; M Slifstein; D R Hwang; A Abi-Dargham; N Simpson; O Mawlawi; N N Guo; R Van Heertum; J J Mann; M Laruelle Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Eugenii A Rabiner; Martin R Wilkins; Federico Turkheimer; Roger N Gunn; Joanna Udo de Haes; Michiel de Vries; Paul M Grasby Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Masahiro Fujita; Christina S Hines; Sami S Zoghbi; Alan G Mallinger; Leah P Dickstein; Jeih-San Liow; Yi Zhang; Victor W Pike; Wayne C Drevets; Robert B Innis; Carlos A Zarate Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jeffrey M Miller; Natalie Hesselgrave; R Todd Ogden; Gregory M Sullivan; Maria A Oquendo; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jeffrey M Miller; Natalie Hesselgrave; R Todd Ogden; Francesca Zanderigo; Maria A Oquendo; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Manesh Gopaldas; Francesca Zanderigo; Serena Zhan; R Todd Ogden; Jeffrey M Miller; Harry Rubin-Falcone; Thomas B Cooper; Maria A Oquendo; Gregory Sullivan; J John Mann; M Elizabeth Sublette Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Elizabeth A Bartlett; Francesca Zanderigo; Denise Shieh; Jeffrey Miller; Patrick Hurley; Harry Rubin-Falcone; Maria A Oquendo; M Elizabeth Sublette; R Todd Ogden; J John Mann Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 13.437
Authors: Gwenn S Smith; Frederick S Barrett; Jin Hui Joo; Najlla Nassery; Alena Savonenko; Devin J Sodums; Christopher M Marano; Cynthia A Munro; Jason Brandt; Michael A Kraut; Yun Zhou; Dean F Wong; Clifford I Workman Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2017-05-13 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Mala Ananth; Elizabeth A Bartlett; Christine DeLorenzo; Xuejing Lin; Laura Kunkel; Nehal P Vadhan; Greg Perlman; Michala Godstrey; Daniel Holzmacher; R Todd Ogden; Ramin V Parsey; Chuan Huang Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 9.236