Mala Ananth1, Elizabeth A Bartlett2, Christine DeLorenzo2,3, Xuejing Lin4, Laura Kunkel3, Nehal P Vadhan5, Greg Perlman3, Michala Godstrey3, Daniel Holzmacher6, R Todd Ogden4, Ramin V Parsey2,3,7, Chuan Huang3,7. 1. Neurobiology & Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA. mala.ananth@stonybrook.edu. 2. Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. 3. Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. 4. Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 5. Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Great Neck, NY, USA. 6. College of Health Professions, South University, Savannah, GA, USA. 7. Radiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lithium, one of the few effective treatments for bipolar depression (BPD), has been hypothesized to work by enhancing serotonergic transmission. Despite preclinical evidence, it is unknown whether lithium acts via the serotonergic system. Here we examined the potential of serotonin transporter (5-HTT) or serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1A) pre-treatment binding to predict lithium treatment response and remission. We hypothesized that lower pre-treatment 5-HTT and higher pre-treatment 5-HT1A binding would predict better clinical response. Additional analyses investigated group differences between BPD and healthy controls and the relationship between change in binding pre- to post-treatment and clinical response. Twenty-seven medication-free patients with BPD currently in a depressive episode received positron emission tomography (PET) scans using 5-HTT tracer [11C]DASB, a subset also received a PET scan using 5-HT1A tracer [11C]-CUMI-101 before and after 8 weeks of lithium monotherapy. Metabolite-corrected arterial input functions were used to estimate binding potential, proportional to receptor availability. Fourteen patients with BPD with both [11C]DASB and [11C]-CUMI-101 pre-treatment scans and 8 weeks of post-treatment clinical scores were included in the prediction analysis examining the potential of either pre-treatment 5-HTT or 5-HT1A or the combination of both to predict post-treatment clinical scores. RESULTS: We found lower pre-treatment 5-HTT binding (p = 0.003) and lower 5-HT1A binding (p = 0.035) were both significantly associated with improved clinical response. Pre-treatment 5-HTT predicted remission with 71% accuracy (77% specificity, 60% sensitivity), while 5-HT1A binding was able to predict remission with 85% accuracy (87% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The combined prediction analysis using both 5-HTT and 5-HT1A was able to predict remission with 84.6% accuracy (87.5% specificity, 60% sensitivity). Additional analyses BPD and controls pre- or post-treatment, and the change in binding were not significant and unrelated to treatment response (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that while lithium may not act directly via 5-HTT or 5-HT1A to ameliorate depressive symptoms, pre-treatment binding may be a potential biomarker for successful treatment of BPD with lithium. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PET and MRI Brain Imaging of Bipolar Disorder Identifier: NCT01880957; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01880957.
BACKGROUND: Lithium, one of the few effective treatments for bipolar depression (BPD), has been hypothesized to work by enhancing serotonergic transmission. Despite preclinical evidence, it is unknown whether lithium acts via the serotonergic system. Here we examined the potential of serotonin transporter (5-HTT) or serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1A) pre-treatment binding to predict lithium treatment response and remission. We hypothesized that lower pre-treatment 5-HTT and higher pre-treatment 5-HT1A binding would predict better clinical response. Additional analyses investigated group differences between BPD and healthy controls and the relationship between change in binding pre- to post-treatment and clinical response. Twenty-seven medication-free patients with BPD currently in a depressive episode received positron emission tomography (PET) scans using 5-HTT tracer [11C]DASB, a subset also received a PET scan using 5-HT1A tracer [11C]-CUMI-101 before and after 8 weeks of lithium monotherapy. Metabolite-corrected arterial input functions were used to estimate binding potential, proportional to receptor availability. Fourteen patients with BPD with both [11C]DASB and [11C]-CUMI-101 pre-treatment scans and 8 weeks of post-treatment clinical scores were included in the prediction analysis examining the potential of either pre-treatment 5-HTT or 5-HT1A or the combination of both to predict post-treatment clinical scores. RESULTS: We found lower pre-treatment 5-HTT binding (p = 0.003) and lower 5-HT1A binding (p = 0.035) were both significantly associated with improved clinical response. Pre-treatment 5-HTT predicted remission with 71% accuracy (77% specificity, 60% sensitivity), while 5-HT1A binding was able to predict remission with 85% accuracy (87% sensitivity, 80% specificity). The combined prediction analysis using both 5-HTT and 5-HT1A was able to predict remission with 84.6% accuracy (87.5% specificity, 60% sensitivity). Additional analyses BPD and controls pre- or post-treatment, and the change in binding were not significant and unrelated to treatment response (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that while lithium may not act directly via 5-HTT or 5-HT1A to ameliorate depressive symptoms, pre-treatment binding may be a potential biomarker for successful treatment of BPD with lithium. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PET and MRI Brain Imaging of Bipolar Disorder Identifier: NCT01880957; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01880957.
Authors: D A Collier; G Stöber; T Li; A Heils; M Catalano; D Di Bella; M J Arranz; R M Murray; H P Vallada; D Bengel; C R Müller; G W Roberts; E Smeraldi; G Kirov; P Sham; K P Lesch Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Frieder Haenisch; Jason D Cooper; Andreas Reif; Sarah Kittel-Schneider; Johann Steiner; F Markus Leweke; Matthias Rothermundt; Nico J M van Beveren; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; David W Niebuhr; David N Cowan; Natalya S Weber; Robert H Yolken; Brenda W J H Penninx; Sabine Bahn Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Rajapillai L I Pillai; Elizabeth A Bartlett; Mala R Ananth; Chencan Zhu; Jie Yang; Greg Hajcak; Ramin V Parsey; Christine DeLorenzo Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Martin J Lan; Francesca Zanderigo; Spiro P Pantazatos; M Elizabeth Sublette; Jeffrey Miller; R Todd Ogden; J John Mann Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 5.678