Literature DB >> 2642556

Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research.

C B Begg1, J A Berlin.   

Abstract

Publication bias is a widely recognized phenomenon that occurs because of the influence of study results on the chances of publication. Usually, studies with positive results are more likely to be published than studies with negative results, which leads to a preponderance of false-positive results in the literature. Empiric studies have demonstrated that the induced bias is large and can have a serious impact on meta-analyses, in which data from several studies are aggregated, as well as on informal reviews. The problem is deeply embedded in current research practice, which encourages demonstration of statistical significance to "prove" theories, and one of its causes is the pressure to publish extensively that is an integral part of the competition for academic promotion. Serious efforts to reduce this problem will involve restructuring the process by which study results are disseminated, changing editorial policies, and altering the style and methods of statistical analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2642556     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/81.2.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  89 in total

1.  Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Emily V A Finlayson; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Toll-like receptor polymorphisms and tuberculosis susceptibility: A comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qin Sun; Qing Zhang; He-Ping Xiao; Chong Bai
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-16

3.  Developing new drugs for cancer.

Authors:  G M Mead; C J Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-26

4.  Solitary pulmonary nodules and masses: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic utility of alternative imaging tests.

Authors:  Paul Cronin; Ben A Dwamena; Aine Marie Kelly; Steven J Bernstein; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  How to critically appraise an article.

Authors:  Jane M Young; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-01-20

6.  Consistent pattern of elevated symptoms in air-conditioned office buildings: a reanalysis of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  M J Mendell; A H Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Effect of adjunctive hormonal therapy on testicular descent and spermatogenic function among children with cryptorchidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kaiping Zhang; Yin Zhang; Min Chao
Journal:  Hormones (Athens)       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.885

8.  Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies.

Authors:  Fujian Song; Sheetal Parekh-Bhurke; Lee Hooper; Yoon K Loke; Jon J Ryder; Alex J Sutton; Caroline B Hing; Ian Harvey
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Does tiotropium lower exacerbation and hospitalization frequency in COPD patients: results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ann Van den Bruel; Jeannine Gailly; Mattias Neyt
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.317

10.  Estimating error in using residential outdoor PM2.5 concentrations as proxies for personal exposures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christy L Avery; Katherine T Mills; Ronald Williams; Kathleen A McGraw; Charles Poole; Richard L Smith; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.