Literature DB >> 26425271

Laying open (deroofing) and curettage under local anesthesia for pilonidal disease: An outpatient procedure.

Pankaj Garg1, Mahak Garg1, Vikas Gupta1, Sudhir Kumar Mehta1, Paryush Lakhtaria1.   

Abstract

AIM: To test the efficacy of lay open (deroofing, not excision) with curettage under local anesthesia (LOCULA) for pilonidal sinus as an outpatient procedure.
METHODS: LOCULA procedure was done for all types of pilonidal disease. The primary outcome measure was cure rate. The secondary outcome measures were hospital stay, operating time, return to work, healing time and complication rate.
RESULTS: Thirty-three (M/F-30/3, mean age-23.4 ± 5.8 years) consecutive patients were operated and followed for 24 mo (6-46 mo). Eleven were pilonidal abscess and 22 were chronic pilonidal disease. Six had recurrent disease. Operating time and the hospital stay was 22.3 ± 5.6 min and 63.8 ± 22.3 min respectively. The patients could resume normal work in 4.3 ± 3.2 d and the healing time was 42.9 ± 8.1 d. Thirty (93.8%) patients had complete resolution of the disease and two (6.2%) had a recurrence. Both the recurrences happened in patients who had complete healing but ignored the prescribed recommendations. One out of these got cured after getting operated again with the same procedure. Thus the overall success rate of this procedure was 96.9%.
CONCLUSION: Lay open (deroofing) with curettage procedure under local anesthesia is an effective procedure to treat both simple and complicated pilonidal sinus and abscess. It is a simple procedure, has a high cure rate (up to 97%), doesn't require admission and is associated with minimal morbidity and scarring. Considering the distinct advantages, this procedure has the potential to become the first line procedure for treating pilonidal disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curettage; Deroofing; Lay open; Pilonidal; Sinus

Year:  2015        PMID: 26425271      PMCID: PMC4582240          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i9.214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  17 in total

1.  THE ELIMINATION OF CAUSAL FACTORS IN PILONIDAL SINUS TREATED BY Z-PLASTY.

Authors:  R S MONRO; F T MCDERMOTT
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu; Resit Inceoglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Prognosis after simple incision and drainage for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess.

Authors:  S L Jensen; H Harling
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

Authors:  S J Al-Homoud; Z S Habib; A S Abdul Jabbar; W H Isbister
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Total excision versus non-resectional methods in the treatment of acute and chronic pilonidal disease.

Authors:  I Matter; J Kunin; M Schein; S Eldar
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Comparison between drainage and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess.

Authors:  Jalal Vahedian; Fatemeh Nabavizadeh; Nouzar Nakhaee; Mohammad Vahedian; Ali Sadeghpour
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Utility of the cleft lift procedure in refractory pilonidal disease.

Authors:  John Bascom; Thomas Bascom
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  I McCallum; P M King; J Bruce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

9.  Unroofing and marsupialization vs. rhomboid excision and Limberg flap in pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  Feza Karakayali; Erdal Karagulle; Zulfikar Karabulut; Ergun Oksuz; Gokhan Moray; Mehmet Haberal
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus with local anaesthesia: a randomized trial of closed compared with open technique.

Authors:  M Testini; G Piccinni; S Miniello; B Di Venere; G Lissidini; V Nicolardi; G M Bonomo
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  8 in total

1.  A comparison of flap reconstruction vs the laying open technique or excision and direct suture for pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis of randomised studies.

Authors:  Charline Berthier; Emilie Bérard; Thomas Meresse; Jean-Louis Grolleau; Christian Herlin; Benoit Chaput
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Anal fistula and pilonidal sinus disease coexisting simultaneously: An audit in a cohort of 1284 patients.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Benign Anorectal Disorder Management in Low-Resource Settings.

Authors:  Lucia Oliveira; Gonzalo Federico Hagerman Ruiz Galindo; Jorge Daniel Silva-Velazco
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-09-13

4.  Laying Open and Curettage under Local Anesthesia to Treat Pilonidal Sinus: Long-Term Follow-Up in 111 Consecutively Operated Patients.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Vipul D Yagnik
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  Semi-closed surgical technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Georgios Sahsamanis; Stavros Samaras; Georgios Mitsopoulos; Titos Deverakis; Georgios Dimitrakopoulos; Dionysios Pinialidis
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-10

6.  Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

Authors:  V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Andriu Orlik; Katharina Maier; Peter Kauf; Marco Schmid; Maja Diekmann; Andreas P Vogt; Verena K Stauffer; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Re: JSLS. 2017 Jul-Sep; 21(3): e2017.00043. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00043. Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Series.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.