Literature DB >> 15900358

Comparison between drainage and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess.

Jalal Vahedian1, Fatemeh Nabavizadeh, Nouzar Nakhaee, Mohammad Vahedian, Ali Sadeghpour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Simple incision and drainage of a sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess is associated with more than 40% recurrence. Definitive treatment of the chronic pilonidal sinus is recommended 4-8 weeks after incision and drainage. The present prospective clinical trial study was designed to compare the curettage and drainage of the acute abscess of the pilonidal sinus. Hospital stay, wound healing, and recurrence were noted.
METHODS: This study was performed in Kerman University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Iran from March 1999 to May 2004. One hundred and fifty patients who had an acute sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess were randomly assigned to receive one of 2 drainage or curettage surgical procedures. All the surgical wounds were laid open, and daily sitting in a warm tub together with douche was recommended postoperatively. The 2 treatment modalities were compared in terms of the wound healing period, hospital stay, and postoperative complications using Chi-square and Student-t test. Patients with completed wound repair, consisting of 72 subjects in the curettage and 59 subjects in the drainage groups, were followed up to 65 months for the detection of recurrence by means of life table and Gehan s generalized Wilcoxon test.
RESULTS: Most patients spent only one day in the hospital, with initial healing occurring in <2 months. Healing process in the curettage cases occurred more quickly than the drainage patients (96% versus 78.7%, p<0.001). In all cases, the treatment relieved symptoms, and all the patients returned to work 7-10 days after the treatment. Three patients in the curettage group (4%) and 16 patients in the drainage group (21.3%) did not complete wound healing within 10 weeks (p<0.001). Recurrence of disease was encountered significantly less in the curettage subjects than the drainage ones (11% versus 42%) (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Unroofing and curettage, which is associated with higher rates of healing and lower rates of recurrence, may be the treatment of choice in the acute pilonidal abscess.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15900358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Med J        ISSN: 0379-5284            Impact factor:   1.484


  10 in total

1.  The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

Authors:  D Segre; M Pozzo; R Perinotti; B Roche
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  A comparison of flap reconstruction vs the laying open technique or excision and direct suture for pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis of randomised studies.

Authors:  Charline Berthier; Emilie Bérard; Thomas Meresse; Jean-Louis Grolleau; Christian Herlin; Benoit Chaput
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Laying open (deroofing) and curettage under local anesthesia for pilonidal disease: An outpatient procedure.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Mahak Garg; Vikas Gupta; Sudhir Kumar Mehta; Paryush Lakhtaria
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

4.  Does pilonidal abscess heal quicker with off-midline incision and drainage?

Authors:  P M Webb; A P Wysocki
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  The comparison of short-term results of marsupialization method in operated patients with acute pilonidal abscess and chronic pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Alaattin Öztürk
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2021-12-31

6.  Pilonidal sinus disease: risk factors for postoperative complications and recurrence.

Authors:  Akin Onder; Sadullah Girgin; Murat Kapan; Mehmet Toker; Zulfu Arikanoglu; Yilmaz Palanci; Bilsel Bac
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

7.  Laying Open and Curettage under Local Anesthesia to Treat Pilonidal Sinus: Long-Term Follow-Up in 111 Consecutively Operated Patients.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Vipul D Yagnik
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2021-04-01

8.  The risk of recurrence of Pilonidal disease after surgical management.

Authors:  Feras M Almajid; Abdullah A Alabdrabalnabi; Khalifa Abdulaziz Almulhim
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

Authors:  V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  R Perinotti; G Gallo; M Milone; L Basso; M Manigrasso; R Pietroletti; A Bondurri; M La Torre; G Milito; M Pozzo; D Segre
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.781

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.