Literature DB >> 26424339

Complications related to the use of spinal cord stimulation for managing persistent postoperative neuropathic pain after lumbar spinal surgery.

Mohammed F Shamji1,2, Harrison J Westwick3, Robert F Heary4.   

Abstract

OBJECT Structural spinal surgery yields improvement in pain and disability for selected patients with spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or a herniated intervertebral disc. A significant fraction of patients exhibit persistent postoperative neuropathic pain (PPNP) despite technically appropriate intervention, and such patients can benefit from spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to alleviate suffering. The complication profile of this therapy has not been systematically assessed and, thus, was the goal of this review. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify prospective cohorts of patients who had PPNP following structurally corrective lumbar spinal surgery and who underwent SCS device implantation. Data about study design, technique of SCS lead introduction, and complications encountered were collected and analyzed. Comparisons of complication incidence were performed between percutaneously and surgically implanted systems, with the level of significance set at 0.05. RESULTS Review of 11 studies involving 542 patients formed the basis of this work: 2 randomized controlled trials and 9 prospective cohorts. Percutaneous implants were used in 4 studies and surgical implants were used in 4 studies; in the remainder, the types were undefined. Lead migration occurred in 12% of cases, pain at the site of the implantable pulse generator occurred in 9% of cases, and wound-related complications occurred in 5% of cases; the latter 2 occurred more frequently among surgically implanted devices. CONCLUSIONS Spinal cord stimulation can provide for improved pain and suffering and for decreased narcotic medication use among patients with PPNP after lumbar spinal surgery. This study reviewed the prospective studies forming the evidence base for this therapy, to summarize the complications encountered and, thus, best inform patients and clinicians considering its use. There is a significant rate of minor complications, many of which require further surgical intervention to manage, including lead migration or implant infection, although such complications do not directly threaten patient life or function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMM = conventional medical management; EDH = epidural hematoma; PPNP = persistent postoperative neuropathic pain; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SCS = spinal cord stimulation; complications; failed-back surgery syndrome; persistent postoperative neuropathic pain; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26424339     DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  10 in total

1.  Complications of epidural spinal stimulation: lessons from the past and alternatives for the future.

Authors:  Giuliano Taccola; Sean Barber; Phillip J Horner; Humberto A Cerrel Bazo; Dimitry Sayenko
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Mitigating Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Migration Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Technical Note.

Authors:  John P Walsh; Juan Jimenez
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-20

3.  Incidence and predictive factors of spinal cord stimulation treatment after lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Merja Vakkala; Voitto Järvimäki; Hannu Kautiainen; Maija Haanpää; Seppo Alahuhta
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Non-invasive Autonomic Neuromodulation Is Opening New Landscapes for Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Mingxian Chen; Songyun Wang; Xuping Li; Lilei Yu; Hui Yang; Qiming Liu; Jianjun Tang; Shenghua Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Acute thoracic disc heralded by change in spinal cord stimulation pattern: illustrative case.

Authors:  Faraz Behzadi; Edvin Telemi; Tarek R Mansour; Thomas M Zervos; Muwaffak M Abdulhak; Ellen L Air
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2021-11-15

6.  Drivers and Risk Factors of Unplanned 30-Day Readmission Following Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.

Authors:  Aladine A Elsamadicy; Amanda Sergesketter; Xinru Ren; Syed Mohammed Qasim Hussaini; Avra Laarakker; Shervin Rahimpour; Tiffany Ejikeme; Siyun Yang; Promila Pagadala; Beth Parente; Jichun Xie; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-09-29

7.  Hip Arthroplasty Instability After Implantation of a Spinal Cord Stimulator.

Authors:  Cambize Shahrdar; Kevin P Smidt
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-07

Review 8.  Two Surgeries Do Not Always Make a Right: Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Phan Q Duy; William S Anderson
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 9.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: Current Trends and Future Applications.

Authors:  Ivano Dones; Vincenzo Levi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-07-24

10.  Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant and Revision Complicated by Syrinx Formation: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Sameer S Ali; Ilya Bragin; Arjumond Y Khan; Hajime Tokuno; Pavan Tankha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-08-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.