Robert Gross1, Lu Zheng2, Alberto La Rosa3, Xin Sun2, Susan L Rosenkranz2, Sandra Wagner Cardoso4, Francis Ssali5, Rob Camp6, Catherine Godfrey7, Susan E Cohn8, Gregory K Robbins9, Anthony Chisada10, Carole L Wallis11, Nancy R Reynolds12, Darlene Lu2, Steven A Safren9, Lara Hosey13, Patrice Severe14, Ann C Collier15. 1. University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Medicine (Infectious Diseases) and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: grossr@mail.med.upenn.edu. 2. Harvard School of Public Health, Biostatistics, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Asociacion Civil IMPACTA Salud y Educacion, Lima, Peru. 4. FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 5. Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda. 6. EUPATI, Barcelona, Spain. 7. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA. 8. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 9. Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 10. University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. 11. Lancet Laboratories, Johannesburg, South Africa. 12. Yale University School of Nursing, New Haven, CT USA. 13. Social and Scientific Systems, Silver Spring, MD, USA. 14. GHESKIO, Port au Prince, Haiti. 15. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adherence is key to the success of antiretroviral therapy. Enhanced partner support might benefit patients with previous treatment failure. We aimed to assess whether an enhanced partner-based support intervention with modified directly observed therapy would improve outcomes with second-line therapy in HIV-infected patients for whom first-line therapy had failed. METHODS: We did a multicentre, international, randomised clinical trial at nine sites in Botswana, Brazil, Haiti, Peru, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Participants aged 18 years or older for whom first-line therapy had failed, with HIV RNA concentrations greater than 1000 copies per mL and with a willing partner, were randomly assigned (1:1), via computer-generated randomisation, to receive partner-based modified directly observed therapy or standard of care. Randomisation was stratified by screening HIV RNA concentration (≤10 000 copies per mL vs >10 000 copies per mL). Participants and site investigators were not masked to group assignment. Primary outcome was confirmed virological failure (viral load >400 copies per mL) by week 48. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00608569. FINDINGS:Between April 23, 2009, and Sept 29, 2011, we randomly assigned 259 participants to the modified directly observed therapy group (n=129) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). 34 (26%) participants in the modified directly observed therapy group achieved the primary endpoint of virological failure by week 48 compared with 23 (18%) participants in the standard-of-care group. The Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative probability of virological failure by week 48 was 25·1% (95% CI 17·7-32·4) in the modified directly observed therapy group and 17·3% (10·8-23·7) in the standard-of-care group, for a weighted difference in standard of care versus modified directly observed therapy of -6·6% (95% CI -16·5% to 3·2%; p=0·19). 36 (14%) participants reported at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event or laboratory abnormality (n=21 in the modified directly observed therapy group and n=15 in the standard-of-care group). INTERPRETATION: Partner-based training with modified directly observed therapy had no effect on virological suppression. The intervention does not therefore seem to be a promising strategy to increase adherence. Intensive follow-up with clinic staff might be a viable approach in this setting. FUNDING: AIDS Clinical Trials Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, US National Institutes of Health.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Adherence is key to the success of antiretroviral therapy. Enhanced partner support might benefit patients with previous treatment failure. We aimed to assess whether an enhanced partner-based support intervention with modified directly observed therapy would improve outcomes with second-line therapy in HIV-infectedpatients for whom first-line therapy had failed. METHODS: We did a multicentre, international, randomised clinical trial at nine sites in Botswana, Brazil, Haiti, Peru, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Participants aged 18 years or older for whom first-line therapy had failed, with HIV RNA concentrations greater than 1000 copies per mL and with a willing partner, were randomly assigned (1:1), via computer-generated randomisation, to receive partner-based modified directly observed therapy or standard of care. Randomisation was stratified by screening HIV RNA concentration (≤10 000 copies per mL vs >10 000 copies per mL). Participants and site investigators were not masked to group assignment. Primary outcome was confirmed virological failure (viral load >400 copies per mL) by week 48. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00608569. FINDINGS: Between April 23, 2009, and Sept 29, 2011, we randomly assigned 259 participants to the modified directly observed therapy group (n=129) or the standard-of-care group (n=130). 34 (26%) participants in the modified directly observed therapy group achieved the primary endpoint of virological failure by week 48 compared with 23 (18%) participants in the standard-of-care group. The Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative probability of virological failure by week 48 was 25·1% (95% CI 17·7-32·4) in the modified directly observed therapy group and 17·3% (10·8-23·7) in the standard-of-care group, for a weighted difference in standard of care versus modified directly observed therapy of -6·6% (95% CI -16·5% to 3·2%; p=0·19). 36 (14%) participants reported at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event or laboratory abnormality (n=21 in the modified directly observed therapy group and n=15 in the standard-of-care group). INTERPRETATION: Partner-based training with modified directly observed therapy had no effect on virological suppression. The intervention does not therefore seem to be a promising strategy to increase adherence. Intensive follow-up with clinic staff might be a viable approach in this setting. FUNDING: AIDS Clinical Trials Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, US National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Alberto M La Rosa; Linda J Harrison; Babafemi Taiwo; Carole L Wallis; Lu Zheng; Peter Kim; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Mina C Hosseinipour; Bernadette Jarocki; John W Mellors; Ann C Collier Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Lentlametse Mantshonyane; Jason Roy; Michael Z Levy; Carole L Wallis; Kathrine Bar; Catherine Godfrey; Ann Collier; Alberto LaRosa; Lu Zheng; Xin Sun; Robert Gross Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 5.944
Authors: Jean B Nachega; Olatunji Adetokunboh; Olalekan A Uthman; Amy W Knowlton; Frederick L Altice; Mauro Schechter; Omar Galárraga; Elvin Geng; Karl Peltzer; Larry W Chang; Gilles Van Cutsem; Shabbar S Jaffar; Nathan Ford; Claude A Mellins; Robert H Remien; Edward J Mills Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Kathleen Ridgeway; Lisa S Dulli; Kate R Murray; Hannah Silverstein; Leila Dal Santo; Patrick Olsen; Danielle Darrow de Mora; Donna R McCarraher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matthew D Hickey; Thomas A Odeny; Maya Petersen; Torsten B Neilands; Nancy Padian; Nathan Ford; Zachary Matthay; David Hoos; Meg Doherty; Chris Beryer; Stefan Baral; Elvin H Geng Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Siphamandla Bonga Gumede; John Benjamin Frank de Wit; Willem Daniel Francois Venter; Samanta Tresha Lalla-Edward Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Steve Kanters; Jay Jh Park; Keith Chan; Nathan Ford; Jamie Forrest; Kristian Thorlund; Jean B Nachega; Edward J Mills Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Alexander J Stockdale; Matthew J Saunders; Mark A Boyd; Laura J Bonnett; Victoria Johnston; Gilles Wandeler; Annelot F Schoffelen; Laura Ciaffi; Kristen Stafford; Ann C Collier; Nicholas I Paton; Anna Maria Geretti Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 9.079