| Literature DB >> 26423242 |
Si Wang1, Kai Liu2, Xin Zhang3, Qingtao Meng4, Yong Wang5, Shixi Wan6, Xiaoping Chen7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing evidences have indicated that there are gender differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome(MS), but the mechanism is uncertain.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26423242 PMCID: PMC4590309 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-015-0104-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Baseline characteristics of the participants in 1992 classified by genders
| Women | Men |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number(%) | 227.0(38.5) | 363.0(61.5) | – |
| Age(years) | 46 ± 6 | 49 ± 6 | <0.001 |
| Height | 154.6 ± 5.4 | 165.2 ± 5.7 | <0.001 |
| Weight | 54.9 ± 6.7 | 62.6 ± 8.0 | <0.001 |
| Waist(cm) | 72.2 ± 6.3 | 77.4 ± 7.4 | <0.001 |
| BMI(kg/m2) | 23.0 ± 2.4 | 22.9 ± 2.7 | 0.923 |
| Smoking(n(%)) | 1(0.4) | 228(62.8) | <0.001 |
| Drinking(n(%)) | 6(2.6) | 210(57.9) | <0.001 |
| Exercise(n(%)) | 46(20.3) | 78(21.5) | 0.723 |
| RHR(beats/min) | 79.9 ± 8.3 | 80.2 ± 9.4 | 0.632 |
| SBP(mmHg) | 109.9 ± 12.9 | 113.4 ± 12.8 | 0.001 |
| DBP(mmHg) | 71.3 ± 8.3 | 73.2 ± 8.5 | 0.011 |
| FPG(mmol/L) | 4.31 ± 1.12 | 4.26 ± 0.74 | 0.479 |
| TG(mmol/L) | 1.86 ± 0.73 | 2.04 ± 0.86 | 0.011 |
| TC(mmol/L) | 4.50 ± 0.80 | 4.42 ± 0.70 | 0.200 |
| LDL(mmol/L) | 2.32 ± 0.81 | 2.22 ± 0.78 | 0.103 |
| HDL(mmol/L) | 1.30 ± 0.24 | 1.24 ± 0.22 | <0.001 |
| Obesity(n(%)) | 25(11.0) | 16(4.4) | 0.002 |
| RBP(n(%)) | 21(9.3) | 64(17.6) | 0.005 |
| RFPG(n(%)) | 7(3.1) | 18(5.0) | 0.271 |
| RTG(n(%)) | 97(42.7) | 202(55.6) | 0.002 |
| DHDL(n(%)) | 113(49.8) | 57(15.7) | <0.001 |
| MS components | 1.16 ± 0.73 | 0.98 ± 0.76 | 0.001 |
Data are presented as means ± SD or number (percentage)
BMI Body mass index, RHR Resting heart rate, SBP Systolic blood pressure, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, FPG Fasting plasma glucose, TG Triglyceride, TC Total cholesterol, LDL Low-density lipoprotein, HDL High-density lipoprotein, RBP Raised blood pressure, RFPG Raised fasting plasma glucose, RTG Raised triglyceride, DHDL Decreased high-density lipoprotein
Fig. 1Incidences of MS according to the RHR categories at baseline. women P for trend = 0.018; men P for trend = 0.194
Logistic regression analyses for the relationship between RHR at baseline and incident MS at follow-up in different models classified by genders
| Women | Men | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI |
| OR | 95 % CI |
| |
| Model 1 | 1.18 | 1.03–1.36 | 0.020 | 1.08 | 0.97–1.21 | 0.177 |
| Model 2 | 1.20 | 1.04–1.38 | 0.011 | 1.08 | 0.96–1.21 | 0.199 |
| Model 3 | 1.23 | 1.06–1.43 | 0.007 | 1.08 | 0.96–1.22 | 0.218 |
Model 1: univariate model
Model 2: adjusted for age and health related behaviors(included smoking, drinking, and exercise)
Model 3: adjusted for age, health related behaviors and pre-existing components of MS