Literature DB >> 26423077

Ecological Recovery Potential of Freshwater Organisms: Consequences for Environmental Risk Assessment of Chemicals.

Andre Gergs1,2, Silke Classen3, Tido Strauss3, Richard Ottermanns4, Theo C M Brock5, Hans Toni Ratte4, Udo Hommen6, Thomas G Preuss4,7.   

Abstract

Chemical contaminants released into the in the environment may have adverse effects on (non-target) species, populations and communities. The return of a stressed system to its pre-disturbance or other reference state, i.e. the ecological recovery, may depend on various factors related to the affected taxon, the ecosystem of concern and the type of stressor with consequences for the assessment and management of risks associated with chemical contaminants. Whereas the effects caused by short-term exposure might be acceptable to some extent, the conditions under which ecological recovery can serve as a decision criterion in the environmental risk assessment of chemical stressors remains to be evaluated. For a generic consideration of recovery in the risk assessment of chemicals, we reviewed case studies of natural and artificial aquatic systems and evaluate five aspects that might cause variability in population recovery time: (1) taxonomic differences and life-history variability, (2) factors related to ecosystem type and community processes, (3) type of disturbance, (4) comparison of field and semi-field studies, and (5) effect magnitude, i.e., the decline in population size following disturbance. We discuss our findings with regard to both retrospective assessments and prospective risk assessment.

Keywords:  Environmental risk assessment; Freshwater community; Plant protection products; Recolonization; Recovery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26423077     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20013-2_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0179-5953            Impact factor:   7.563


  4 in total

1.  Linking pesticide marketing authorisations with environmental impact assessments through realistic landscape risk assessment paradigms.

Authors:  Franz Streissl; Mark Egsmose; José V Tarazona
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Alistair B A Boxall; Lorraine Maltby; Bryan W Brooks; Murray A Rudd; Thomas Backhaus; David Spurgeon; Violaine Verougstraete; Charmaine Ajao; Gerald T Ankley; Sabine E Apitz; Kathryn Arnold; Tomas Brodin; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Jennifer Chapman; Jone Corrales; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Teresa F Fernandes; Jerker Fick; Alex T Ford; Gemma Giménez Papiol; Ksenia J Groh; Thomas H Hutchinson; Hank Kruger; Jussi V K Kukkonen; Stefania Loutseti; Stuart Marshall; Derek Muir; Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Kai B Paul; Andreu Rico; Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Jörg Römbke; Tomas Rydberg; Helmut Segner; Mathijs Smit; Cornelis A M van Gestel; Marco Vighi; Inge Werner; Elke I Zimmer; Joke van Wensem
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Specifying the Dimensions of Aquatic Life Benchmark Values in Clear, Complete, and Justified Problem Formulations.

Authors:  Glenn Suter
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Influence of Metal Contamination and Sediment Deposition on Benthic Invertebrate Colonization at the North Fork Clear Creek Superfund Site, Colorado, USA.

Authors:  Brittanie L Dabney; William H Clements; Jacob L Williamson; James F Ranville
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 9.028

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.