Literature DB >> 26422825

Economic analyses of stress urinary incontinence surgical procedures in women.

Tanner Rawlings1, Philippe E Zimmern2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the quality of economic analysis (EA) of surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.
METHODS: A MEDLINE search on EA for SUI surgical procedures for the years 2000-2014 included the MeSH terms "tension-free vaginal tape," "TVT," "trans-obturator tape," "TOT," "Burch colposuspension" (BC), "stress urinary incontinence," "economic analysis," and "cost-effectiveness analysis." Important criteria for evaluating articles were selected from panels that set out criteria to evaluate EA [Scales CD, Jr., Christopher SS, American Urological Association 32:121-128, 2013], [Hsieh MH, Maxwell MV, J Urol 178 1867-1874, 2007], [Wu JM, Catherine CM, Conover MM, et al., Obstet Gynecol 123 1201-1206, 2014].
RESULTS: Thirteen articles were identified: TVT compared to BC (6), to other surgical procedures for SUI (1), to TOT (3) and to the mini-sling (1); open BC compared to laparoscopic BC (1), and analysis of various slings and meshes for various types of incontinence (1). Articles originated from: United States (3), Europe (4), United Kingdom (4), and Canada (2). Eight described cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), two cost-utility analysis, and three cost comparison. Follow-up time for patients ranged from 6 to 24 months in eight articles, with four having a minimum of 24 months follow-up. Studies mostly adhered to the criteria, however indirect costs, sensitivity analysis, and efficacy parameters varied. Long-term synthetic sling-related complications were not included.
CONCLUSION: Although CEA for SUI surgery is a burgeoning field, study comparisons remain difficult due to some variability, including health care delivery systems. As women live longer, long-term data will become critical as complications and reoperations can affect the real cost of SUI corrective procedures. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:1040-1045, 2016.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov modeling; economic analysis; stress urinary incontinence; surgical procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26422825     DOI: 10.1002/nau.22878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  2 in total

1.  Costs analysis of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a brazilian public hospital, comparing burch and synthetic sling techniques.

Authors:  Leo Francisco Limberger; Fernanda Pacheco Faria; Luciana Silveira Campos; Karin Marise Jaeger Anzolch; Alexandre Fornari
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

2.  Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies.

Authors:  Sandra Zwolsman; Arnoud Kastelein; Joost Daams; Jan-Paul Roovers; B C Opmeer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.894

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.