Literature DB >> 26422715

Characteristics of Consecutive Esophageal Motility Diagnoses After a Decade of Change.

Katherine Boland1, Mustafa Abdul-Hussein, Radu Tutuian, Donald O Castell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) measures concomitantly bolus transit and pressure changes allowing determination of the functional impact of esophageal motility abnormalities. Ten years ago our laboratory reported MII-EM results in 350 consecutive patients. Since then high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) became available and the definitions of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and nutcracker esophagus were revised. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of these developments on esophageal function testing.
METHODS: From August 2012 through May 2013, HRIM was performed in 350 patients referred for esophageal function testing. Each patient received 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. While taking advantage of the new technology and revised criteria, HRIM findings were classified according to the conventional criteria to allow more appropriate comparison with our earlier analysis.
RESULTS: Compared with the study performed 10 years ago, the prevalence of normal manometry (36% vs. 35%), achalasia (7% vs. 8%), scleroderma (1% vs. 1%), hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (7% vs. 7%), and hypotensive LES (1% vs. 2%) remained the same, whereas the prevalence of distal esophageal spasm (9% vs. 3%), nutcracker esophagus (9% vs. 3%), and poorly relaxing LES (10% vs. 3%) decreased and the prevalence of IEM increased (20% vs. 31%) significantly. Compared with the early study, normal liquid bolus transit was significantly different in patients with hypertensive LES (96% vs. 57%) and poorly relaxing LES (55% vs. 100%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study brings to light the increase in prevalence of IEM. In addition, it suggests that the hypertensive LES and poorly relaxing LES may each affect bolus transit in about half of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26422715     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  5 in total

1.  A Positive Correlation Between Gastric and Esophageal Dysmotility Suggests Common Causality.

Authors:  Thomas A Zikos; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos; Kirsten A Regalia; Irene S Sonu; Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker; Monica C Nandwani; Linda A Nguyen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Characterization of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Children Presenting With Dysphagia Using High-Resolution Manometry.

Authors:  Francis Edeani; Adeel Malik; Ajay Kaul
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-03

Review 3.  Minor esophageal functional disorders: are they relevant?

Authors:  Ryan A Balko; Don C Codipilly; Karthik Ravi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-17

Review 4.  Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Daniel Sifrim; Dustin A Carlson; Mary Hawn; David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Roberto Penagini; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Roger Tatum; Michel Vaezi; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.960

5.  Calcium Receptor and Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Circular Muscle of Lower Esophagus from Patients with Achalasia.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Jun-Feng Liu; Xin He; Xin-Bo Liu; Ling-Ling Zhang; Lian-Mei Zhao; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.