| Literature DB >> 26422605 |
David C Houghton1, Matthew R Capriotti2, Alessandro S De Nadai3, Scott N Compton4, Michael P Twohig5, Angela M Neal-Barnett6, Stephen M Saunders7, Martin E Franklin8, Douglas W Woods9.
Abstract
The Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) and the NIMH Trichotillomania Severity Scale (NIMH-TSS) are two widely used measures of trichotillomania severity. Despite their popular use, currently no empirically-supported guidelines exist to determine the degrees of change on these scales that best indicate treatment response. Determination of such criteria could aid in clinical decision-making by defining clinically significant treatment response/recovery and producing accurate power analyses for use in clinical trials research. Adults with trichotillomania (N=69) participated in a randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy and were assessed before and after treatment. Response status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale, and remission status was measured via the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale. For treatment response, a 45% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best indicator of clinically significant treatment response, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 30-40% reduction or 6-point raw score difference was most effective cutoff. For disorder remission, a 55-60% reduction or 7-point raw score change on the MGH-HPS was the best predictor, and on the NIMH-TSS, a 65% reduction or 6-point raw score change was the best indicator of disorder remission. Implications of these findings are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Hair pulling; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Psychotherapy; Signal detection; Trichotillomania
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26422605 PMCID: PMC4658278 DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anxiety Disord ISSN: 0887-6185