Cícero Figueiredo-Freitas1,2,3, Raul A Dulce4, Matthew W Foster5,6, Jingsheng Liang3, Aline M S Yamashita2, Frederico L Lima-Rosa2, J Will Thompson6, M Arthur Moseley6, Joshua M Hare4, Leonardo Nogueira2, Martha M Sorenson2, José Renato Pinto1,3. 1. 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida. 2. 2 Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis (IBqM), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro, Brazil . 3. 3 Department of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida. 4. 4 Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, University of Miami , Miami, Florida. 5. 5 Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina. 6. 6 Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
AIMS: The heart responds to physiological and pathophysiological stress factors by increasing its production of nitric oxide (NO), which reacts with intracellular glutathione to form S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), a protein S-nitrosylating agent. Although S-nitrosylation protects some cardiac proteins against oxidative stress, direct effects on myofilament performance are unknown. We hypothesize that S-nitrosylation of sarcomeric proteins will modulate the performance of cardiac myofilaments. RESULTS: Incubation of intact mouse cardiomyocytes with S-nitrosocysteine (CysNO, a cell-permeable low-molecular-weight nitrosothiol) significantly decreased myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity. In demembranated (skinned) fibers, S-nitrosylation with 1 μM GSNO also decreased Ca(2+) sensitivity of contraction and 10 μM reduced maximal isometric force, while inhibition of relaxation and myofibrillar ATPase required higher concentrations (≥ 100 μM). Reducing S-nitrosylation with ascorbate partially reversed the effects on Ca(2+) sensitivity and ATPase activity. In live cardiomyocytes treated with CysNO, resin-assisted capture of S-nitrosylated protein thiols was combined with label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to quantify S-nitrosylation and determine the susceptible cysteine sites on myosin, actin, myosin-binding protein C, troponin C and I, tropomyosin, and titin. The ability of sarcomere proteins to form S-NO from 10-500 μM CysNO in intact cardiomyocytes was further determined by immunoblot, with actin, myosin, myosin-binding protein C, and troponin C being the more susceptible sarcomeric proteins. INNOVATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Thus, specific physiological effects are associated with S-nitrosylation of a limited number of cysteine residues in sarcomeric proteins, which also offer potential targets for interventions in pathophysiological situations.
AIMS: The heart responds to physiological and pathophysiological stress factors by increasing its production of nitric oxide (NO), which reacts with intracellular glutathione to form S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), a protein S-nitrosylating agent. Although S-nitrosylation protects some cardiac proteins against oxidative stress, direct effects on myofilament performance are unknown. We hypothesize that S-nitrosylation of sarcomeric proteins will modulate the performance of cardiac myofilaments. RESULTS: Incubation of intact mouse cardiomyocytes with S-nitrosocysteine (CysNO, a cell-permeable low-molecular-weight nitrosothiol) significantly decreased myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity. In demembranated (skinned) fibers, S-nitrosylation with 1 μM GSNO also decreased Ca(2+) sensitivity of contraction and 10 μM reduced maximal isometric force, while inhibition of relaxation and myofibrillar ATPase required higher concentrations (≥ 100 μM). Reducing S-nitrosylation with ascorbate partially reversed the effects on Ca(2+) sensitivity and ATPase activity. In live cardiomyocytes treated with CysNO, resin-assisted capture of S-nitrosylated protein thiols was combined with label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to quantify S-nitrosylation and determine the susceptible cysteine sites on myosin, actin, myosin-binding protein C, troponin C and I, tropomyosin, and titin. The ability of sarcomere proteins to form S-NO from 10-500 μM CysNO in intact cardiomyocytes was further determined by immunoblot, with actin, myosin, myosin-binding protein C, and troponin C being the more susceptible sarcomeric proteins. INNOVATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Thus, specific physiological effects are associated with S-nitrosylation of a limited number of cysteine residues in sarcomeric proteins, which also offer potential targets for interventions in pathophysiological situations.
Authors: Boris Reidel; J Will Thompson; Sina Farsiu; M Arthur Moseley; Nikolai P Skiba; Vadim Y Arshavsky Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Christopher I Murray; Lesley A Kane; Helge Uhrigshardt; Sheng-Bing Wang; Jennifer E Van Eyk Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Mark J Kohr; Angel M Aponte; Junhui Sun; Guanghui Wang; Elizabeth Murphy; Marjan Gucek; Charles Steenbergen Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Mark J Kohr; Junhui Sun; Angel Aponte; Guanghui Wang; Marjan Gucek; Elizabeth Murphy; Charles Steenbergen Journal: Circ Res Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Sean C Little; Brandon J Biesiadecki; Ahmet Kilic; Robert S D Higgins; Paul M L Janssen; Jonathan P Davis Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Eranthie Weerapana; Chu Wang; Gabriel M Simon; Florian Richter; Sagar Khare; Myles B D Dillon; Daniel A Bachovchin; Kerri Mowen; David Baker; Benjamin F Cravatt Journal: Nature Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Chutima Rattanasopa; Jonathan A Kirk; Tepmanas Bupha-Intr; Maria Papadaki; Pieter P de Tombe; Jonggonnee Wattanapermpool Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Sen Zhu; Rakeshwar S Guleria; Candice M Thomas; Amanda Roth; Fnu Gerilechaogetu; Rajesh Kumar; David E Dostal; Kenneth M Baker; Jing Pan Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Tyler R Reinoso; Maicon Landim-Vieira; Yun Shi; Jamie R Johnston; P Bryant Chase; Michelle S Parvatiyar; Andrew P Landstrom; Jose R Pinto; Hanna J Tadros Journal: J Muscle Res Cell Motil Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.352