Literature DB >> 26420758

Sex differences in parental care: Gametic investment, sexual selection, and social environment.

András Liker1,2, Robert P Freckleton3, Vladimir Remeš4, Tamás Székely5,6.   

Abstract

Male and female parents often provide different type and amount of care to their offspring. Three major drivers have been proposed to explain parental sex roles: (1) differential gametic investment by males and females that precipitates into sex difference in care, (2) different intensity of sexual selection acting on males and females, and (3) biased social environment that facilitates the more common sex to provide more care. Here, we provide the most comprehensive assessment of these hypotheses using detailed parental care data from 792 bird species covering 126 families. We found no evidence for the gametic investment hypothesis: neither gamete sizes nor gamete production by males relative to females was related to sex difference in parental care. However, sexual selection correlated with parental sex roles, because the male share in care relative to female decreased with both extra-pair paternity and frequency of male polygamy. Parental sex roles were also related to social environment, because male parental care increased with male-biased adult sex ratios (ASRs). Taken together, our results are consistent with recent theories suggesting that gametic investment is not tied to parental sex roles, and highlight the importance of both sexual selection and ASR in influencing parental sex roles.
© 2015 The Author(s). Evolution © 2015 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Adult sex ratio; anisogamy; mating system; offspring development; parentage; parental sex roles

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26420758     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Polyandrous bee provides extended offspring care biparentally as an alternative to monandry based eusociality.

Authors:  Michael Mikát; Lukáš Janošík; Kateřina Černá; Eva Matoušková; Jiří Hadrava; Vít Bureš; Jakub Straka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Male-only care and cuckoldry in black coucals: does parenting hamper sex life?

Authors:  Ignas Safari; Wolfgang Goymann; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sperm competition games when males invest in paternal care.

Authors:  Gustavo S Requena; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection.

Authors:  Michael D Jennions; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.

Authors:  Judit Mokos; István Scheuring; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Coevolution of parental investment and sexually selected traits drives sex-role divergence.

Authors:  Lutz Fromhage; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Sex roles, parental care and offspring growth in two contrasting coucal species.

Authors:  Wolfgang Goymann; Ignas Safari; Christina Muck; Ingrid Schwabl
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  More than just noise: Chance, mating success, and sexual selection.

Authors:  Hope Klug; Libby Stone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Sex-biased breeding dispersal is predicted by social environment in birds.

Authors:  Zsolt Végvári; Gergely Katona; Balázs Vági; Robert P Freckleton; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tamás Székely; András Liker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Certainty of paternity in two coucal species with divergent sex roles: the devil takes the hindmost.

Authors:  Ignas Safari; Wolfgang Goymann
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.