Literature DB >> 26420685

Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT, ProTaper Universal and iRace files in simulated S-shaped canals.

Sirawut Hiran-us1, Somsinee Pimkhaokham2, Jirapat Sawasdichai1, Arata Ebihara3, Hideaki Suda3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the shaping ability of three nickel-titanium endodontic file systems by comparing three parameters: canal deviation, apical foramen position and instrumentation time. A glide path was established in 30 simulated S-shaped canal blocks that were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 10): ProTaper Universal, ProTaper NEXT and iRace. Each group was instrumented per its manufacturer's directions. Pre- and postoperative images were superimposed to determine any canal deviation or change in apical foramen position. The instrumentation times were recorded. The iRace system resulted in the least mean canal deviation. The apical foramen position was least shifted by the iRace system. The iRace system also required the least instrumentation time. The iRace system demonstrated the most favourable shaping ability in all three parameters.
© 2015 Australian Society of Endodontology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  S-shaped canal; apical foramen; canal deviation; canal preparation; nickle titanium rotary

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26420685     DOI: 10.1111/aej.12117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Endod J        ISSN: 1329-1947            Impact factor:   1.659


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of apical centring ability between incisal-shifted access and traditional lingual access for maxillary anterior teeth.

Authors:  Yoshio Yahata; Yoshiko Masuda; Takashi Komabayashi
Journal:  Aust Endod J       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 1.659

2.  Simulated root canals preparation time, comparing ProTaper Next and WaveOne Gold systems, performed by an undergraduate student.

Authors:  Inês Conceição; Inês Ferreira; Ana-Cristina Braga; Irene Pina-Vaz
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-08-01

3.  Comparison of the Shaping Ability of WaveOne Reciprocating Files with or without Glide Path in Simulated Curved S-shaped Root Canals.

Authors:  Ayca Yilmaz; Enver Sedat Kucukay; Murat Istektepe; Selen Nihal Sisli; Handan Ersev; Isil Karagoz-Kucukay
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-06-20

4.  Analysis of Surface Characteristics of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next Instruments by Scanning Electron Microscopy.

Authors:  Jeffery Bennett; Kwok-Hung Chung; Hanson Fong; James Johnson; Avina Paranjpe
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-07-01

5.  Comparison of the shaping characteristics of Neolix and Protaper Universal systems in preparation of severely-curved simulated canals.

Authors:  Maryam Forghani; Maryam Hezarjaribi; Hamidreza Teimouri
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-04-01

6.  In Vitro Comparison of Efficacy of Neolix and ProTaper Universal Retreatment Rotary Systems in Removal of Gutta-Percha Combined with Two Different Sealers.

Authors:  Nooshin Sadat Shojaee; Ehsan Vakilinezhad; Mohammad Mehdi Shokouhi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2019-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.