Literature DB >> 26420610

The Future of Biobanking: A Conceptual Look at How Biobanks Can Respond to the Growing Human Biospecimen Needs of Researchers.

Stella B Somiari1, Richard I Somiari2.   

Abstract

Biobanking of human biological specimens has evolved from the simple private collection of often poorly annotated residual clinical specimens, to well annotated and organized collections setup by commercial and not-for-profit organizations. The activities of biobanks is now the focus of international and government agencies in recognition of the need to adopt best practices and provide scientific, ethical and legal guidelines for the industry. The demand for more, high quality and clinically annotated biospecimens will increase, primarily due to the unprecedented level of genomic, post genomic and personalized medicine research activities going on. Demand for more biospecimens provides new challenges and opportunities for developing strategies to build biobanking into a business that is better able to supply the biospecimen needs of the future. A paradigm shift is required particularly in organization and funding, as well as in how and where biospecimens are collected, stored and distributed. New collection sites, organized as Research Ready Hospitals (RRHs) and new public-private partnership models are needed for sustainability and increased biospecimen availability. Biobanks will need to adopt industry-wide standard operating procedures, better and "non-destructive" methods for quality assessment, less expensive methods for sample storage/distribution, and objective methods to manage scarce biospecimens. Ultimately, the success of future biobanks will rely greatly on the success of public-private partnerships, number and diversity of available biospecimens, cost management and the realization that an effective biobank is one that provides high quality and affordable biospecimens to drive research that leads to better health and quality of life for all.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic biobanks; Biobank networks; Biobanking; Biospecimen; Community hospitals; National biobanks; Regional biobanks; Research ready hospitals; Sustainable biobanking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26420610     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20579-3_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  13 in total

1.  Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank.

Authors:  Jenna van Draanen; Pamela Davidson; Helene Bour-Jordan; LeeAnna Bowman-Carpio; David Boyle; Steve Dubinett; Brian Gardner; Jachael Gardner; Courtney McFall; Dan Mercola; Terry Nakazono; Stephanie Soares; Hubert Stoppler; Margaret Tempero; Scott Vandenberg; Yu Jui Wan; Sarah Dry
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Biobanking for necrotizing enterocolitis: Needs and standards.

Authors:  Hala Chaaban; Troy A Markel; Jennifer Canvasser; Misty Good
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Opportunities and Risks for Research Biobanks in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.

Authors:  Daniel Simeon-Dubach; Marianne K Henderson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Emerging Opportunities for Target Discovery in Rare Cancers.

Authors:  Tanaz Sharifnia; Andrew L Hong; Corrie A Painter; Jesse S Boehm
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 8.116

5.  The Future of Biobanking: What Is Next?

Authors:  Luciana Caenazzo; Pamela Tozzo
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-23

6.  A biobank to support HIV malignancy research for sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Johann Wilhelm Schneider; Micheline Sanderson; Dieter Geiger; Mostafa Nokta; Sylvia Silver
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2016-08-02

Review 7.  Genes, cells, and biobanks: Yes, there's still a consent problem.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Blake Murdoch
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  HEnRY: a DZIF LIMS tool for the collection and documentation of biomaterials in multicentre studies.

Authors:  Stephanie Heinen; Nick Schulze; Bernd Franke; Florian Klein; Clara Lehmann; Maria J G T Vehreschild; Claas Gloistein; Melanie Stecher; Jörg Janne Vehreschild
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Willingness to Participate in a National Precision Medicine Cohort: Attitudes of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients at a Cleveland Public Hospital.

Authors:  Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Dana C Crawford; Aaron Goldenberg; Anne Slaven; Julie Pencak; Marleen Schachere; William S Bush; John R Sedor; John F O'Toole
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-06-26

10.  The landscape of biobanks in Poland-characteristics of Polish biobanking units at the beginning of BBMRI.pl organization.

Authors:  Anna Chróścicka; Angelika Paluch; Łukasz Kozera; Małgorzata Lewandowska-Szumieł
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.